Talk:Sexuality in the United States

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexuality in the United States article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: History Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹ The template below (WikiProject History) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sexuality in the United States be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Resources[edit]

This article needs more resources that delve into the nuances of sexuality within the United States. A focus on its impact across socio-economic groups and various ethnic groups would be useful.168.7.223.25 (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merger[edit]

REJECTED

Merge rejected per WP:SNOW. ElectroChip123 (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Adolescent sexuality in the United States is very much a part of Sexuality in the United States. Plus, given the amount of information that is redundant between the two articles, it doesn't make sense to keep them separate. Moreover, Adolescent sexuality in the United States can easily be explained within the context of Sexuality in the United States. ElectroChip123 (talk) 00:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support: for the above reasons. ElectroChip123 (talk) 00:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Sexuality in the United States is currently a small article. The Adolescent sexuality in the United States article is quite hefty and would overwhelm this article to where it would essentially be the Adolescent sexuality in the United States article with a little bit of information on other things. Plus, the Adolescent sexuality in the United States topic is WP:Notable and deserves a dedicated article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:20, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The fact that topic A is a part of topic B is not a reason to merge. Redundancy isn't a problem; main articles are supposed to (redundantly) summarize their sub-topics. This is all explored in great detail in Wikipedia:Summary style. The actual problem here is that Sexuality in the United States is far, far too short.
It can be expanded by orders of magnitude to cover a great number of disparate topics that are mostly not even mentioned, or else given too little coverage. Category:Sexuality in the United States is a good starting point for the many topics that should be summarized. Besides adolescent sexuality, there should be a section summarizing Sex education in the United States, and another one summarizing the topic of Birth control in the United States. Category:American sexologists has 80 biographies in it, and that could be summarized in a section. Another one on Abortion in the United States. We should have an article Sex industry in the United States but only have a category; in any event, the topic merits a section here. I could go on: LGBT, sex scandals, sexual harassment, rape, pornography, etc etc.
The vast size of the subject is overwhelming, which is why returning to Wikipedia:Summary style is helpful. The example topic there is World War II, also vast in scope, and it's a good model for how to break apart a broad topic into manageable parts for a main summary article. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree with the reasons given by Flyer22 Reborn and Dennis Bratland. If anything, I could see merging the article with Adolescent sexuality, but not with Sexuality in the United States. Still though, I think it's best to leave the article as its own article. Also, leaving the article as it is would be consistent with other country-specific articles on "adolescent" sexuality, such as Adolescent sexuality in the United Kingdom. This article does need a great deal of editing though to become neutral in point of view, but that's another issue entirely. Vontheri (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.