Talk:Slavey
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Canada may be able to help! |
Name
[edit]Is it known whether the name was originally translated by the British or the French? Deipnosophista (talk) 08:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know, but can try some OR. The OED says,
- [tr. Cree awahkān captive, slave; the disyllabic Eng. forms reflect a local jargon var. with Fr. suffix -ais.]
- though it doesn't say if that was an actual borrowing from the French, or coinage by analogy.
- However, the earliest attestations are all monosyllabic (1789: "Slave Lake ... Slave Indians", 1801 "whom they called slaves ... name of the Slave River", 1851 "the timid Slave or Hare Indians are sacrificed". Slavé doesn't come in until Bancroft 1875, Slavi 1890.
- The 1789 ref cites a "Mr. Leroux",
- Mr. Leroux arrived on the 22nd March from the other side of Slave Lake where he had seen a great number of Red Knives and Slave Indians.
- though that would be too late to be the origin of the name, since it was a letter and the writer evidently expected his reader to know who was meant. — kwami (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- more original research in the course of ongoing wheedling.Skookum1 (talk) 02:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Slavey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
very short stub --Skookum1 (10 May 06) |
Last edited at 12:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 06:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Slavey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050315115302/http://www.mnsu.edu:80/emuseum/cultural/northamerica/slavey.html to http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/northamerica/slavey.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Slavey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050223161157/http://www.calverley.ca/Part01-FirstNations/01-032.html to http://www.calverley.ca/Part01-FirstNations/01-032.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Rename?
[edit]Requested move 12 April 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Move not supported per WP:COMMONNAME (no evidence provided either way) and concerns that the proposed name wouldn't have the same scope as the current one. (non-admin closure) Vpab15 (talk) 11:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Slavey → Deh cho (people) – It's nonsensical that such a name is used primarily; imagine if all the conquered people historically were called this, but they're not, and since a native name exists why not use that? Otherwise we might end up with a situation where 99% of people are called this and only the 1% aren't, which would be a disambiguating nonsense to say the least... 2.97.151.50 (talk) 01:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Per WP:COMMONNAME and MOS:IDENTITY, you need to cite reliable sources that prefer this term. We don't automatically use the endonym. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Like gov sites? Also, this isn't just any exonym, it'd be like if for every other people only insults were used to define them. That site doesn't have a single mention of this word (nor does the TV series, as the article says). --2.97.151.50 (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- If your reasoning for this move is that "Slavey" is a slur, you need to cite sources. I'll also note that the link you provided seems to refer specifically to the Dehcho First Nations, and doesn't establish that this term applies to all First Nations described at Slavey. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 14:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Like gov sites? Also, this isn't just any exonym, it'd be like if for every other people only insults were used to define them. That site doesn't have a single mention of this word (nor does the TV series, as the article says). --2.97.151.50 (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support While the move request is not well sourced a quick look at the refs in the article show that 'Dene Cho' or "Dene Tha' are used in reliable sources namely teh census [1], consulting reaserch [2] and more imp[ortantly that they refer to themselves as 'Dehcho Dene' [3]. The claim 'salvey is derogatory is supported by the cbc article [4] and that consulting research—blindlynx (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- We already have articles at Dene Tha' First Nation and Dehcho First Nations. What is missing is whether Deh cho (people) is an accurate qualifier for both (as well as Fort Nelson First Nation.) The census link suggests "Dene Tha" is synonymous with Slavey. The pdf also refers only to "Dene Tha'". The third link is the Dehcho First Nations website, so that doesn't establish anything in regards to the other groups. And the fourth link offers only some testimonials of people who say they dislike being associated with the name, it's not a scholarly source. Based on this, Oppose. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I don't disagree with a move but Deh cho (people) isn't correct. I can't find a use for a small c in Deh Cho. There are several possible names but I can't see one that is fully inclusive. There is Dehcho (it's a redirect to Deh Cho), Dehcho people (here), Dene Tha, Dehcho Dene and Deh Cho Dene. The Government of the NWT has the Dehcho Region but also use North Slave Region and the South Slave Region and both North and South Slavey are official languages. Note that none of them are thought useful as redirects except Dehcho. Given that Dehcho is the name for the Mackenzie River it is not very likely the Fort Nelson First Nation think of themselves as Deh Cho people. They say they are Slavey/Cree. The same would apply to the Dene Tha' First Nation of Alberta. As far as I can see the only name that would include all of the peoples are Slavey or Dene. Of course if someone can find sources that cover everyone then that would be fine. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Shutah Dene
[edit]The Shutah Dene, who are members of the [Ross River Dena Council] in the Yukon, are Mountain Slavey people living to the west of the [Mackenzie Mountains]. they should be included in the article. Luigizanasi (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Unknown-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Canadian Territories articles
- Low-importance Canadian Territories articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Wikipedia requested maps in Canada