Talk:Smosh/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Smosh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
NOT NUMBER ONE ANYMORE, CHANGE NEEDED
As of 9/25/08, Smosh is no longer the #1 most subscribed on YouTube. The article must be changed! http://www.youtube.com/members?s=ms&t=a&g=0 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned"SuperWiki8 (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Editing smosh
Why is the page not editable? Some things need to be updated. user:ScoutingforGirls 10:42 13 February 2008 (GMT)
- It is, if you have an account, which you have. Androo123 (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Newgrounds
They have several flash videos on Newgrounds. Should we include them in the article? snakecrack76 06:24 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Some of those movies on Newgrounds are ones that are also on YouTube (e.g. Mortal Kombat Theme)[1]. I also found out that the person who maintains the Smosh profile on Newgrounds is Anthony. Preceding 16 September (15 September and before), the profile had his age as 19, but the next day on 16 September, the age was 20, and I'm pretty positive that it's Anthony who has the profile on Newgrounds. SchfiftyThree (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
re-orginisation
I shuffled a few things around yesterday (thought I'd added to the talk page but must not have saved it)
I put the article under some sub-headings: the list of videos and the controversy over the pokemon theme. Any veterans out there who think it was a turn for the worse please feel free to speak up. Also I added the bit about the "shut up- that song's copyrighted" themeVeggieburgerfish (talk) 19:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
By the way I think something needs to be done about the list of videos it needs to be updated or abolished; there are only a few there. I also think there is a template for videography somewhere I think I've seen it on some other page but I can't remember which and have no clue how to use them anywayVeggieburgerfish (talk) 19:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Hebrew
I made a smosh page in the Hebrew wikipedia, you can see it from the left side of the article here, in other languages: עברית. --80.230.4.130 10:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Sources needed
The article contains quite a lot of utterly unsourced statements. Among the worst (in this respect) sections, I would name "Website history", "Removed/Altered videos", "Equipment", and "Trivia". "Video history" could also be a little more precise when, for example, "critical acclaim" or "good reviews" are mentioned. While I do not doubt the truth of these statements, we should still give reliable sources for them. If none are forthcoming, I might remove all unsourced statements in a few weeks. --Huon 17:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Thats pretty much my fault. I've been an active part of the smosh community for over 3 years. When I saw this article I just sorta started writing pretty much everything I knew about smosh.--Ashuku 07:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Lets just cite what we can from the New York Times article, the magazine article, that interview with Anthony on the Smosh myspace blog, and the rest we can say was confirmed by the webmaster of Smosh or Anthony --Ngard039 14:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, but no. We can't say something "was confirmed by Anthony". Even if Anthony edited the article in person (and I believe people are discouraged from significantly adding to articles about themselves), he would still need to give reliable sources in order to satisfy WP:RS and WP:NOR. Actually, I believe everything that can't be sourced is not notable enough to be included in the first place. For example, "Equipment" - is it really notable that Anthony uses a Dell? Does it have any impact on the quality of Smosh's work? --Huon 15:41, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Actually it is, one of the questions frequently asked on the website is "what equipment do you guys use for the videos?" The inclusion of that into the article helps to answer this and cut down on people's questions.--Ngard039 21:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't object - if it is verifiable. If it is not, then it does not belong on Wikipedia. After all, Wikipedia is not Smosh's FAQ. --Huon 12:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I have verifiable sources, but do I really have to put a newpaper quote verifying that Anthony and Ian are really 18 and attend Amercain River College?
- If there is a newspaper article mentioning those facts, sure, go ahead and put it under "References". I wouldn't even know where to look for such an article. --Huon 15:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I actually had links to the articles in exterior links, but someone deleted them.--Ngard039 01:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Ok, Huon. Is that better?--Ngard039 20:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, that's quite a lot better. I would love to add the Sacramento Bee article [2], too, but unfortunately it can only be read by registered users. --Huon 09:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
Can we have this article locked from vandals? There's been way too much vandalism on this page.--Ngard039 20:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
If you used Wikipedia for anything other than creating and editing the entry about yourself you might better understand wikipedia's Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy.
"Semi-protection should be considered if it is the only option left available to solve the problem of vandalism of the page, if the amount of vandalism is difficult for editors to keep up with. Like full protection, it is usually a last resort, not a pre-emptive measure."
Jaderaid 08:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- We've been getting very large amounts of vandalism resently. I suggest have we reconsider semi-protection for this page. CRouleau 00:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Most vandalism is done by 207.216.48.71 I think we need an admin to ban him from editing pages -CRouleau 06:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong support I also agree we need to semi-protect this page. -- ChunkyStyle (talk • contribs) 22:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Age?
How old are the boys? What's their date of births, are they still 18 or is that info old? JayKeaton 14:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- According to the Medium article, both were eighteen in March 2006. Their birthdates seem to be difficult to trace. Maybe we should just give their ages at some important event (e.g. creation of the Pokémon theme song)? --Huon 15:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh cool, I got the dobs, just emailed them. I will also create stubs for both of them. The rationale behind it is that they are pretty well known, one of their videos is the second most popular of all time on YouTube and there is a strong possibility that their website and community may expand a lot in the future, like other sites that have turned into industries, like PennyArcade and newgrounds. JayKeaton 19:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
According to their Myspace profile (which is run by Anthony and Ian) they are both currently 19 years old. evoblur 21:12, 26 June 2007 (EST)
Ian is 19 and Anthony is 20. User:EuroJordan 16:10 November 6, 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 22:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Clean up
This page could also use quite a bit of clean up, I'll add it to my things to do but any suggestions, or better yet some cleaning up itself, please report here JayKeaton 19:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
It's much too breezy, in a fannish tone, and the article should not repeatedly call them by their first names. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Why can't they call them by their first names? A lot of people don't know their last names and besides, look at the "Brookers" article: Brooke_Brodack. That seems way more fannish than the Smosh one. --Ngard039 15:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Encyclopedias don't use first names except to distinguish people with the same last name. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
There's other articles that call the subject by their first name Kimbo_Slice, do they all need the cleanup stamp? --Ngard039 14:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Almost everywhere it said "Ian and Anthony" I changed to "Padilla and Hecox" it sounds kinda weird in some of the places so feel free to change them to "the boys" "smosh" whatever.
- I fixed the brookers article too. :) Jaderaid 08:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- I fixed the Kimbo Slice article, Ngard039, if you know of any more articles with the first name, last name problem please tell me on my talk page. -CRouleau 05:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Some of you may have cleaned it up a bit TOO Well. Look at the article. What's different? EuroJordan (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
"Cruft"
I fail to see how including their dates of birth is "cruft." illspirit|talk 23:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agree, calling something cruft ("low-quality things in general") that's point of veiw, an opinion, dob's can be found all over wikipedia, please don't start a Revert war --Sirex98 00:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Easter Eggs, Deleted Videoes?
Should we add these? They are apart of something and would let people know. Why did we delete them in the first place?MattC13 15:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Pokemon theme song
Hey I was on youtube today and hello the pokemon theme song is still there.
- It is not from smosh, though.
- Well the original video by Smosh was removed a while ago, did you see one of the voice dubs in another language? A speed-up slow-down version? If you just saw the original Smosh video then it was uploaded it by someone who went to Smosh.com and downloaded it from there and re-uploaded it to YouTube. I know that that happened because I saw the video myself. {{ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12}} 04:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Youtube probably doesn't care about other people uploading the pokemon theme video. Oh yeah.. for some strange reason, I didn't delete the pokemon video from my playlist. It shows how many views it had, 24,732,537. Please do not delete it, it isn't an estimated number. It is true. Snakecrack76 8:39, 21 August 2007
Grammar
Cleanup tags, such as the grammar tag that I added to this article today, are used to designate articles that would benefit from improvement. Please respect the contributions of other users as we work together to improve articles, and do not remove cleanup tags before anyone has a chance to work on the article. Maralia 03:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the mistake. I will make sure it never happens again. 24.107.66.62
Delete
Note: This article will not be deleted. The Delete section is simply for discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.151.174.208 (talk) 23:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
The article basically says that "Smosh" are two guys who post videos on YouTube. Like MILLIONS of other YouTube users. I propose the article for deletion because its subject is not notable. Devil Master 10:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- To note, they are also one of the biggest ones on YouTube currently and have been around longer than most of the current video posters. They also have a massive fanbase and others. Nocarsgo 18:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- I say the Smosh article should be kept for reasons stated above, and because they are subscribed to by over 130,000 people on YouTube and because they have a contract with MTV or VH1 or somebody. ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12 03:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
this should be deleted, its ridiculous, there is nothing special about them
I'm sorry, but you don't have a contract with MTV/VH1 or whatever, so don't go telling us what's notable and what isn't. 81.145.241.67 15:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
They have a contract to do two videos a month or something like that. And for your information, oh great "I'm going to tell everyone what's wrong because I'm always right", they had a video on MTV's TRL. So they're obviously bigger than just YouTube. They also have their own actual website, They created video's and hosted Logitech's "How Not To" contest. It's obvious they're more than just a couple of guys on YouTube. You're obviously just jealous because you'll never be as loved as them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.33.186 (talk) 10:27, August 26, 2007 (UTC)
Most subscribed and most viewed (before being taken down) video is notable enough. More people watched that video than there were people that tuned in for Lost last week. JayKeaton 02:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
But are they original? Like that one video with them stamping those manila envelopes, did that have something to do with lick-less stamps? What did that have to do with American River College, anyway? Didn't they graduate? Is Smosh political or something, like nobody knows about it? What do they have to do with that ACT test thing?
Maybe Youtube is the right place for them. And did you notice their Smosh.com site? Is their page format new or was it always like that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.157.235 (talk) 07:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, there seems to be some kind of tie-in with that ACT test Black Chalks deletion thing. There is a Padilla family in the Sacramento area who has made its fortune from multiple bail bonds agencies; if the Smosh Padilla is from the same family, then the Smosh videos can be seen to be unoriginal, just recreations of bail bonds arrests. If a different Padilla family, then no. But the whole Smosh success is hinged on Black Chalks? What a sad commentary on California education. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.145.32 (talk) 11:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
If Smosh is deleted every other Youtuber page (including Youtube Celebrity main page) should be deleted! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.47.134.10 (talk) 13:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Guy in background
Does anybody know anything about the guy who is almost always in the background of a shoot? After the camera switches and goes back to the original camera, the guy is gone. Examples: Reunited? and Assassins. In Reunited? the guy is standing across the street when Teabag pulls his gun out and in Assassins he is sitting on a fire hydrant in the escape scene. Who is this guy?? Guus Hoekman 08:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Watch this video. http://youtube.com/watch?v=dewxCGrauco EuroJordan 22:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I believe that's the man whose sister started Black Chalks at American River College. I may be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.153.52 (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
He's a friend of Anthony and Ians and a founding member of Smosh.
Check out their video called "that damn neighbor" he is the damn neighbor, people are asking questions like this on youtube alot and I keep having to answer them.
- The neighbour who doesn't move on-camera, see videos "That Damn Neighbour" and "That damn Yard sale"
Verifiablity
Please provide references to all information in the article, according to wikipedia policies summarized in wikipedia:Attribution. Unattributed information may be deleted at any time. `'Míkka>t 18:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Link to a review site
Hi,
yesterday I deleted an external link from this article's page. It was a link to the page http://tilzy.tv/ . Specifically the tilzy-page on this article's topic. I came to the idea of deleting those links as such a link was also added to Ze Frank's wikipedia page, and I expected that there wouldn't be much new information on such an external site, as Ze Frank's show ended more than half a year ago.
I got a mail now by one of the founders of tilzy.tv. He explained to me relatively convincingly that he didn't post the link, and that he thinks of his site as adding extra information.
Whether or not we re-add this link should probably be based on Wikipedia:External_links.
I am actually not sure whether tilzy.tv is a
Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
Does someone else know this site?
My main concern was, that there should be several sites that aggregate links to vlogs. Even several sites that aggregate links and add write a small review about them. So I wasn't sure whether tilzy.tv is in someway special or provided better information.
Could maybe someone post his/her opinion on that, so we can decided whether or not to include the links to tilzy.tv.
Thanks, -- JanCK (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
YouTube chronology list
I kind of don't understand why the chronology of Smosh's videos keep getting deleted. Their videos are from YouTube of course, and I believe that's the source. If we keep it, then it would provide the title, release date, and the "Shut Up!" intro (probably), among other things. Those users who still delete that stuff, like Mikkalai, could be wrong... SchfiftyThree (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, just a second ago I was wondering why the Smosh page was so short and I scrolled down and saw there was no chronology list and that's one of the major things people will look at. We need to fix this! 76.185.52.212 (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I agree. Just because he thinks it shouldn't be there doesn't mean it should be deleted all together. Arogi Ho (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- The bad news for me is that this page is now fully protected, and can only be edited by administrators. Mikkalai is an admin, and because of the page protection, he can probably decide whether it can be on there or not. I'm not an administrator, but I wish to be one someday, so I can edit fully-protected pages and block bad users. Maybe I'll discuss this with the person who keeps reverting it. SchfiftyThree (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
I think ther should be a chronology list. Having a cronology list for smosh is like having a discography for a band.
What happened?
The chronology doesn't really need to be deleted - it could quite easily be sourced with the actual videos.SouperAwesome (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just as we don't list huge lists of articles published by professors and journalists, some of which have 100, 200, 400, ..., publications, there is no reason to list all 2-4 minute videos, unless they have been discussed by someone somewhere. This follows general wikipedia rules of "common sense" and "notability". But I will not object to this list, if it will be supplied with external links and all notes of kind "First video to have extra cast" or "Longest video", etc., must be with references as well. Please create a draft of such table here (not necessarily complete), after that I will unprotect the article, you yourself will copy it there (so that your glory will be in article's history), and hopefully all subsequent fans of Smosh will follow the established pattern in the list. `'Míkka>t 02:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- P.S. What the heck is the ' "Shut up!" Intro' thingy. If it is something of note, please provide an explanation (of course, with a reference), otherwise it has no place in the table. `'Míkka>t 02:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you think all the tables were fancruft, then isn't Lonelygirl15 like the biggest piece of fancruft that exists at the moment? Because Smosh is WAY more known and popular than Lonelygirl15. Also, check the Geriatric1927 article. Arogi Ho (talk) 14:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
um its at the start of like every video its when thers a funny noise or quote that relares to the video and then either anthony or ian yells "shut up!" they change throughout so they should probably stay i dont understand why the page has been protected and all the chronology deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.15.19 (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
This is really stupid... we shouldnt delete the info mainly because smosh is a bigger thing then chris crocker lisa nova ect. if they diserve all that info on them so should smosh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.47.134.10 (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, that is no way for admin to act, I'm pretty sure fascism is not part of Wikipedia's policies. For Mikalai, I suggest to reconsider your actions and reverting the article back to the state where the info has not yet been deleted. There was bunch of referenced parts that got deleted by your rash actions. Also you are using admin priviledges to force your own opinion that has no wide support. --Sapeli (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Can anyone inform another admin to fix this? Arogi Ho (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- There's nothing to fix. Mikalai did the right thing. If you feel another article has similar problems, put an appropriate notice on that article. "There's a lot of worse junk on Wikipedia!" is never a justification for having bad article content. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I hav to disagree.... Wikipedia is an informational site... All the admins did is delete info... and thats unfair to Smosh because they are a bigger and more popular Youtube Channel than TWK or Chris Crocker (who mite i say has a giant wiki page compared to Smosh) and if u just say "If u think the other channels have the same (nonexsistant)problems as Smosh tell the admins to delete there info too to be fair," Thats just deleting creditable info. Wikipedia is meant for info... so why would u delete almost a whole (creditable) page and then lock it so it cant be fixed! This page had no problems it just makes Wikipedia look bad to Smosh Fans! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.47.134.10 (talk) 13:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
At least add a Trivia section or something. Chris Crocker doesn't deserve his own page anyway.
Let's remove Mikkalai's so called "fancruft" from other pages as well then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arogi Ho (talk • contribs) 11:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
The Chronology may have been unneccessary, but what about the pokemon video being taken down, and the the later comment on the "SHUT UP!!!" intro saying "SHUT UP- THAT SONG's COPYRIGHTED". The shut up theme is a notable feature on all of there videos and therefore it is information that should be included in all their articles. There was lots of valid information in the parts of the articles deleted. Wikipedia:Trivia_sections says "If information is otherwise suitable, it is better that it be poorly presented than not presented at all.". This was not a trivia section but the idea still applies to it- do not delete valid information because of poor presenation- do all you can to improve the presentation and sift through unwanted information. Smosh are probably the most famous people on the internet and warrant more than 7 lines. The current state of the article is pathetic. There are no sections, just short sentences that are basically just trivia but instead of bullets put into a paragraph in individual sentences. Rever the article, and if you don't like the current state of it- YOU make on in your userspace and then upload it when it is fit for wikipedia. Because this isn't.
WP:IDONTCARE - Just because you aren't interested in the subject matter- doesn't mean it is worthless
--Veggieburgerfish (talk) 12:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I am ambivalent regarding the complete deletion of the chronology table, but come on everyone, look at what that table used to say in December: "First video to have a chance of death" etc. If we can make a clean, Wikipedia-appropriate chronology without fancruft such as "Shut Up! intro" and the like, then I am all for it. ~ Hyuugamoto (talk) 23:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
How do we go about getting this article unprotected? There really is no reason for it to be protected as it wasn't ever vandalised. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_is_not_paper says:
"There is no reason why there shouldn't be a page for every Simpsons character, and even a table listing every episode, all neatly cross-linked and introduced by a shorter central page. Every episode name in the list could link to a separate page for each of those episodes, with links to reviews and trivia. Each of the 100+ poker games can have its own page with rules, history, and strategy. Jimbo Wales has agreed: Hard disks are cheap." So can someone with an account please put it back in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.157.146 (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Greg Checci
Greg Checci actually directs most of their videos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SantanaHomerunner (talk • contribs) 15:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Any proof? Arogi Ho (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
yes check there vids —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.185.242 (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- They say he's the cameraman, not their director. Arogi Ho (talk) 20:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
He's the Camerman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.129.207 (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
$20,000,000 Lawsuit
I removed this due to the fact that it was an obvious April Fool's Joke and there is enough proof to back it up.Waffle77 (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
But It doesnt matter who backs it up man they are selling thier stuff and they wearent even kidding around like they usually do.The only reason why they are getting sued bow was becaz they were barely 18 when they made it and now they are 20.Wait and see —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.189.128.162 (talk) 22:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
It's not a real lawsuit it's an april fools joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.128.65 (talk) 23:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
If you actually try buying something on the Buy Our Stuff section of the Smosh website, it will say the item is unavailable; and U.S. civil lawsuits aren't the same as criminal/juvenile cases. I don't want to make this too complicated but they still could have been sued back when they were 18 or whatver, but it would be suing their guardians. They would have probably sued Youtube for hosting the video anyway. Waffle77 (talk) 00:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
And even if it wasn't an April fools joke, why the hell would they sell an empty bottle for $1,000? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sage1989 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Site crash
The Smosh site recently crashed, probably from traffic.75.67.128.65 (talk) 23:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
This article needs to be extended
Just a suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RaggedGlory (talk • contribs) 08:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- It was much larger last December, but most was removed for being unreferenced. The removal was discussed back in January, as seen above. --ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12 (talk) 20:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Should Smosh get some more chat lines? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SurelyEvan (talk • contribs) 19:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Clearing up all this "SHUT UP!!!" rucus
A note needs to made in the article again About the "SHUT UP!!!" Intro to each video. I haven't added it to the trivia section because I'm not sure if that would be appropriate. It really is a notable feature of their videos, so I think it may even warrant its own section. Any comments? Wikipedia veterans and/or admin would be welcomed. --Veggieburgerfish (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Reception section?
Maybe a few details like their award, the Pokemon video, and some notable high viewcounts and maybe other statisics like how quickly videos get 1 mil views or something, could go into a reception section, or something similar. --Veggieburgerfish (talk) 20:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Chronolgy
So from reading the results of discussion, the general consensus is that a chronolgy section is good, as long as it is of a good standard, and using the propper template, sounds good, but I for one have no idea how to do that. If anyone here has then please post some sort of a draft here and see if our beloved admin deem it acceptable (no sarcasm intended)--Veggieburgerfish (talk) 20:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Suspended
Today (July 30, 2008) their YouTube account got suspended there was no car crash they still have the account IanH and Smosh.com possibly crashed or was removed.
- If you can confirm it with a reliable source Ctjf83Talk 03:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
what the fuck are you talking about??? what car crash??? they never got suspended!!!! - Adozenlies97 (talk)
The Spectre of Deletion
I can see that this article was proposed for deletion two years ago, and the result was to keep it. However, after two years, I can see that the article really hasn't come very far, constituting all of two paragraphs of non-information. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory of You Tube content. If it's so important that we keep this article, I suggest that the propontents of this article actually contribute content to this article, lest it face deletion yet again. Brash (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've nomed this for deletion, it desperately needs reliable independent sources to establish notability.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 18:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
- Some of the articles from the afd should be added to this article as it proves notability with reliable sources.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 20:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Edit
You guys should make this like it was before with the tables and stuff. TK(film) (talk) 16:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
i know smosh
Hi smosh i know your cousin Anthony his names Mike Muniz an hes my friend!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Insert non-formatted text herei lov cake —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.125.135 (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Good for you, pal. But remember: talk pages are for discussing the ARTICLE and and the ARTICLE'S content . Any fan fiction/gossip relating to the subject of the article is not allowed. Leo-Roy!review/gb 21:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Update
This page needs to be updated with more info added. I remember this page used to be big, but then it got edited way down. I think we should bring that big page back. User talk:GMANGRIFFG —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.224.3 (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Longer article needed
If channels with less subscribers such as kevjumba and what the buck have long wikipedia articles, smosh deserves one, and definetley needs a list of episodes 216.86.120.163 (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Please look at this WP:WAX Kyle1278 01:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
They still needs a list of episodes though. They do have 1 million subscribers. Mrpengo88 (talk)Insert non-formatted text here
- The amount of subscribers has nothing to do with a Wikipedia article. Kyle1278 22:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Unsatisfied with article
This article used to be much more informative when it included a chart listing their videos and any notes about them. I believe it also had a history section. I would like to see these return. Maybe there could be an article for List of Smosh Episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.77.11.53 (talk) 03:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- a listing of there episodes is not needed Wikipedia is not a blog to show everything that people had done. Cheers Kyle1278 04:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
It's obvious that people are coming to this article not only to gain background information on Smosh, but to also read up on a history of episodes. I would like to see a list of episodes myself. There is nothing wrong with this, and I don't think of it as being blog-like information. It is no different than a discography or a list of tv episodes for a popular TV show. Goldhunt (talk) 06:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- It would be extremely long to list ALL of smosh's videos seeing as they have made over 100 Iamcool234 05:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Smosh is far older
This is clear evidence that Smosh was around since at least 2003. I noticed this a long time ago, but it wasn't until I found this that I knew that it was the same Smosh. —Coastergeekperson04's talk@Jul/09/09 17:25
- I agree with that evidence. I'll add that right away Iamcool234 05:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Could somebody try...
And make the videography portion of the article readable and presentable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.164.183 (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Shut Up App and Google Sponsorship
I think it would be an interesting addition if anybody can find reliable sources. Goldhunt (talk) 08:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
==Sketch comedy== they are obviously sketch comedy. im gonna add that into the description.
Placeholder Image
Aren't placeholder images not supposed to be used? Correct me if i'm wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Centralized_discussion/Image_placeholders/Proposal_1 Iamcool234 06:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Smosh Is Number 1?
I just checked Youtube it says smosh is Number 1 subbed now. Nigahiga And Fred were removed from the top subbed list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.203.166.14 (talk) 06:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Yeah, have seen this too. I sort of had a fangirl freakout but had to check to be sure YouTube wasn't messing with us... yeah but in correct standards they would be third, right? 72.222.137.80 (talk) 21:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Smosh Is number 5
When I checked a few weeks ago it said they were #1 with almost 3 million subscribers. Youtube must of glitched because now there is only 2,014,699 subs. Now Smosh has 2,058,904 Subscribers [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.63.226 (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
AnthonyPadilla
Why does it say that the AnthonyPadilla Channel has been inactive since February 2011? I checked now, on September 1st, and it's still up and running. It was never closed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JillianVM (talk • contribs) 02:55, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- It hasn't seen any activity, i.e. no videos have been uploaded since February. 117Avenue (talk) 04:44, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
it means he hasnt uploaded a video since then , not that he shut down the account — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.167.231 (talk) 00:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Sidebars.
In the side bar, it doesn't show that much information. What the heck? No birthdays, no pictures. Nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoshymegan (talk • contribs) 15:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Do you have a reliable source for their birthdays? Do you own a free image of the guys? 117Avenue (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Other series???
Mail Time With Smosh is pretty much Ian Is Bored, but can you post it anyways?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.251.121 (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ian is Bored is already mentioned. 117Avenue (talk) 13:52, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
No! Can you mention MailTime With Smosh? 70.71.251.121 (talk) 03:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- How's that? 117Avenue (talk) 05:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Images
The picture is of extremely low quality~ better and clearer images can be found just on the Internet, isn't it possible to update that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tullia Catriona Fraser (talk • contribs) 09:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Unless you have an image you are willing to release, no this is the best we have. Wikipedia has an image use policy, which states we can only used images that have been released with the proper licence, we can't just go around the internet stealing other people's property. 117Avenue (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
AskCharlie cancelled
In the latest episode of AskCharlie, it says "last episode" and Charlie dies of butt cancer in the episode. So, AskCharlie will no longer be an active account, unless they use it for something else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supernerdybompop42 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Updated, but it seems odd to say a channel has been inactive since December 2011. 117Avenue (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Edit request on 1 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The YouTube channel "AnthonyPadilla" has just uploaded a new video on December 31, 2011. The months active should change from "November 2006 to February 2011" to "November 2006 to December 2011", or it should say there are three active accounts.
Jaweeweeisbored (talk) 11:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Already done Changed to "2005-present" --Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are referring to the infobox, Jaweeweeisbored was referring to the second paragraph. 117Avenue (talk) 01:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Correctly Fixing This Page
If I edit this page with reliable sources and correct information, will it stay that way or all be deleted again? This page used to be much better as can be seen by this discussion page and the dissatisfaction with the article. -GMANGRIFFG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmangriffg (talk • contribs) 21:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Edit request on 14 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Ian has stated in one of his videos ("OUR WEIRDEST FAN EXPERIENCE") to add to his Wikipedia page that he calls all animals "mammals" when he is hungry. So I wanted to add it to the page.
Rachelr42 (talk) 02:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done : he can say many things ~ does not mean they'll be included. -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 02:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
All Smosh Episodes-Please Add This
All Videos on Smosh Account
|
---|
Lip Synching
Justin Bieber
If [blank] Were Real
Spoofs/Commercials
Anthony's Death
Boxman
Shorts
Music
Billy Mays
Food Battle
That Damn Series
THAT GAME SUCKS!
X-Mas
Best Of
Life As Ghosts
Hardcore Max
Aprils Fools
Pokemon
How Not To...
True Story
Epic Teeny Battle
Charlie The Drunk Guinea Pig
Being Fat
Sponsorship
Miscellaneous Smosh Skits
Messages
|
I LITERALLY SPENT THREE HOURS DOING THIS! I will post askcharlie, IanH and AnthonyPadilla episodes l8er. TTYL! 70.71.251.121 (talk) 06:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Any other reason that it should be included, other than the time you spent on it? 117Avenue (talk) 13:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, this is the same person that wrote the episode list, just on a diff computer. You should add this because it's their videography. 70.71.251.121 (talk) 03:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Different computer? You've got the same IP address. Again I ask, why you think it should be included. 117Avenue (talk) 05:21, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I don't think anyone needs a list of every episode, it just takes up space. I find it VERY hard to believe that took more then 20 minutes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.239.19 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Good Luck updating that every time the come out with an episode. And, if you were to make one, it would only make sense to include EVERY CHANNEL. I also believe it should include a link to videos, then, I will add it to the page. Thanks. ♪♫19maxx♪♫ 16:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have just created the Smosh videography page to place the videos. ZappaOMati 17:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Why? 117Avenue (talk) 03:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Who says I can't? Besides, what about KevJumba videography and Wong Fu Productions videography? Besides, I didn't even finish it. ZappaOMati 04:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Would a merge from that page to this be appropriate then? ZappaOMati 04:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- It adds nothing to the article, I'm going to nominate KevJumba, WongFu is a production company, but it is overly long, and borderline trivial. No, it is an overly long list that adds no encyclopaedic content. 117Avenue (talk) 05:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Would a merge from that page to this be appropriate then? ZappaOMati 04:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Who says I can't? Besides, what about KevJumba videography and Wong Fu Productions videography? Besides, I didn't even finish it. ZappaOMati 04:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Why? 117Avenue (talk) 03:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have just created the Smosh videography page to place the videos. ZappaOMati 17:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit request: Pokemon Theme Revenge (2012-02-11)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Someone should add a reference to Pokemon Theme Song REVENGE! on YouTube. Thanks! 68.173.113.106 (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Not done: And someone should explain as to why we should add it. Thank you, -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 04:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see why not, this article can expand. 117Avenue (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Edit Request
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add that they have five active accounts (they added elsmosh to their accounts) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.65.110.79 (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Out of Date and Stub
I tagged this article because I believe it is out of date and does not display enough information on the subject.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 19maxx (talk • contribs)
- It's not a stub, even though it may lack some information on the subject. If you think it is out of date you should suggest here in what way, to help other editors. Or update it yourself. PamD 16:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- How is it out of date? It mentions the end of ask charlie, the start of ElSmosh, and I update the subscribers every month. 117Avenue (talk) 01:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Add more information about Ian And Anthony
This article needs to tell more about Ian and Anthony. because they are Smosh and it should have information about them.Android4.0 (talk) 02:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
semi-protect this page
Someone needs to semi-protect the smosh article, too reduce vandalism. Android4.0 (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Smosh LLC, rather than Smosh?
Shouldn't this become Smosh LLC, (which is actually owned by Alloy Digital, see the footer of smosh.com and | here ) seeming as it is a group consisting of their different channels and the merchandising? Proof and more info: [3] [4] [5] [6] (Search for Smosh) [7] Thanks. 86.144.56.32 (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC) (On behalf of Daylon124 )
- This article is about the duo commonly known as Smosh, and for notability being as such. 117Avenue (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
They are owned by Alloy Digital, so maybe the article should say something about it. Android4.0 (talk) 06:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Anthony Padilla
Where's Anthony's middle name? ISeeWhatYouDo (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
He either does not have one, or does not show it for some reason. but "Danger" is not his middle name.Android4.0 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:39, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
We need his middle name, so we know his full name. Deal. With. It. --ISeeWhatYouDo (talk) 05:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- You deal with it. You can't have it because you don't deserve to know.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:56, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
If "Danger"(or any thing else)was his middle name, it would be shown on smosh.com/about-us . Android4.0 (talk) 20:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
franchise
Would the anthonypadilla channel be considered apart of the franchise. It seems more of a personal channel for Anthony. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Android4.0 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- It is linked to on both the "Smosh" and "IanH" channels, and contains behind the scenes videos. 117Avenue (talk) 03:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Schedule
I don't think the current schedule is accurate. I believe this one shall be used:
Channel | "Smosh" | "IanH" | "ElSmosh" | "Shut Up! Cartoons" | "Smosh Games" |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sunday | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | I Have A Raging Bonus |
Monday | N/A | Ian Is Bored Lunchtime with Smosh (alternating weeks) |
New Smosh video | Planets | Why We're Single Super Mari Fun Time |
Tuesday | N/A | N/A | N/A | Politicats | Backseat Gaming Dope! Or Nope |
Wednesday | N/A | N/A | N/A | Really Freaking Embarrassing | S.A.G.N.U.T. Gametime With Smosh |
Thursday | N/A | N/A | Old Smosh video | Samurai! Daycare | Boss Fight of the Week Smosh Games Review |
Friday | New Smosh episode | N/A | N/A | Oishi Origins | Top 5 Friday Smosh Game Bang |
Saturday | N/A | Smosh Pit Weekly | N/A | N/A | Gamer Nation |
Thank you. WantMyOldChannelBack (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Not done: Smosh has moved Lunchtime with Smosh to monday as said in their video on http://www.smosh.com/videos/im-girl-lunchtime-smosh. Everything else is correct also. Android4.0 (talk) 03:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I didn't watch that video until today, I am making changes as we speak. WantMyOldChannelBack (talk) 06:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Characters
I think we should add a characters subject to the page. Smosh has several different characters that make occasional appearances on the show. Examples include: Anthony, Ian, Billy, Billy's dad, Billy's mom, Sgt. Anous[2], etc. I feel this would add more substance and possibly help remove the "stub" label from this article. Thank you for your consideration.DrCEOandFounder (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)DrCEOandFounder
Smosh Characters
Here is a list of people/actors who have appeared on Smosh's videos. (I'm only mentioning the main channels of Smosh)
Consecutive Smosh Cast:
Anthony Padilla Mostly seen on: 1. Smosh 2. SmoshGames (Gametime With Smosh) 3. IanH. (Ian is bored, Lunchtime with Smosh)
Ian Hecox Mostly seen on: 1. Smosh 2. IanH (Ian is Bored, Lunchtime with Smosh) 3. SmoshGames (Gametime With Smosh)
Mari Mostly seen on: 1. SmoshGames 2. IanH (Smosh Pit Weekly)
Sohinki Mostly seen on: 1. SmoshGames (Dope or Nope, SmoshGames Review, Smosh GameBang, Gamer Nation, I Have a Raging Bonus (once or twice)
Lasercorn Mostly seen on: 1. SmoshGames (Dope or Nope, SmoshGames Review, Smosh GameBang, Gamer Nation)
Jovenshire Mostly seen on: 1. SmoshGames (Dope or Nope, SmoshGames Review, Smosh GameBang, Gamer Nation, I Have a Raging Bonus (once or twice)
Guest Stars: NigaHiga Seen on: IanH (Ian is Bored)
Mari Seen on: IanH (Ian is Bored)
Teleporting Fat Guy Seen on: Smosh ShutUp Cartoons (Teleporting Fat Guy Series!)
I Set My Friends On Fire Seen on: Smosh
as of December 20th — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJ200012 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Subsection for different channels?
Think it would make the page look tidier if there was a section on the page which had a brief synopsis of each channel, and would avoid the huge paragraph at the top of the page (while also giving the deserved nod to the rest of the Smosh team including the Smosh Games crew, Mari, El Smosh characters and additional recurring characters in Smosh videos. VampireKilla (talk) 06:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Potential edit war
Recently, me and JoshBlitz (talk · contribs) have been reverting each other's edits, me first reverting due to him adding an unsourced statement about Charlie being actually alive. I pointed out that the character died, but was reverted. I later added a ref for the duo passing RWJ, but was reverted again by JoshBlitz. Afterwards, me and Shadowjams (talk · contribs) reverted his edits on spam links. The page is currently on JoshBlitz's revision since I don't want to break the three-revert rule. ZappaOMati 02:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- Josh's edits are clearly unconstructive - he has recieved a last warning for spamming, and a 3RR warning - both of which, have been broken. I reported him to WP:AIV. — MST☆R (Chat Me!) 02:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
- I was considering WP:ANEW, but I guess that works. ZappaOMati 02:48, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 15 January 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Smosh hit 2 billion views in January. It is no longer 1.9 Wildwackerjacker (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: The subscriptions and views are not a running tally, "more than 1.9 billion video views as of January 2013" is still correct, and will be correct, even after January 2013. 117Avenue (talk) 05:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- That doesn't make any sense. Why would you prefer "more than 1.9 billion video views" instead of "more than 2 billion views"? --Hugo Spinelli (talk) 03:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- I prefer not updating every article every day. 117Avenue (talk) 05:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- That doesn't make any sense. Why would you prefer "more than 1.9 billion video views" instead of "more than 2 billion views"? --Hugo Spinelli (talk) 03:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Anthony learned to ride his bike at 14
In the recent video 'Anthony Ruins My Car!' (http://www.smosh.com/videos/anthony-ruins-my-car-ian-bored) - Anthony mentions in the car that he learned riding his bike at 14. I thought this might be some nice info to add to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeeminglySubdued (talk • contribs) 23:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- There's a lot of people that learned to ride a bike in their teens. Heck, I have yet to learn to ride a bike. ZappaOMati 02:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 26 February 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
With Zombies ended and Do's and Don'ts and Puberina have already started. 86.45.44.34 (talk) 21:13, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Please give a reliable source to confirm your claims. Camyoung54 talk 01:55, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 7 March 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
i would likie to put that when ian is hungary, instead of saying animal he says mammal. and that ian s favourite sound is kiku
86.130.0.228 (talk) 19:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RudolfRed (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Cinedigm Deal
In November 2012, Alloy Digital partnered with the company Cinedigm to create Smosh content that will eventually be released in movie theaters (http://www.tubefilter.com/2012/11/02/smosh-alloy-digital-cinedigm). Should this be mentioned? Reb525 (talk) 23:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- What's Tubefilter? How is it a reliable source? 117Avenue (talk) 05:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it's linked to several times on the Alloy Digital website, which is one of the main companies involved, but I'm guessing that probably doesn't count for anything here. There is an article about the Alloy/Cinedigm/Smosh deal published directly on the website of Cinedigm, which is the other company involved in the deal (http://investor.cinedigm.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=717505), so that's coming directly from one of the companies involved. I'm still not sure if that's considered "reliable," though; I couldn't find anything about that kind of scenario on the Identifying Reliable Sources page. (Sorry, I'm really new here!) Reb525 (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Tubefilter is an established source for reporting on online video, but if the article is just puffery based on press releases, the "deal" may not merit a mention. Think of it like a future movie, unless there's proof its really happening, it might be too soon.--Milowent • hasspoken 19:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Full name please
Anthony Padilla's name is Anthony Danger Padilla. Danger is his middle name. Ha like you saying that line in a movie. But it seriously is check evil fortune cookie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.214.126 (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- They play characters in their videos, what is said and done in their videos isn't real. 117Avenue (talk) 06:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
2005
Smosh started in 2005. They say it in many of their videos. Please change that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newyorka3 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, they've said 2002. 117Avenue (talk) 05:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Raising Money
In the article it states that Ian and Anthony 'hope' to raise $250,000 for a game they are creating. They have finished raising the money - see this video 212.111.145.20 (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- The game's mentioned over at Smosh Games. ZappaOMati 15:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Song spoof
Has Ian made a spoof music video of that goofy Weird Al Yankovic's song Melanie? Can't seem to find it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.221.191.80 (talk) 15:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Kalel
I think that in the channel's section there should be some mentioning of Kalel's (Anthony's girlfriend's) channel WonderlandWardrobe, because her rewind blogs often feature Anthony and sometimes even Ian, for example in rewind blog #3 (Video), she goes to the youtube HQ in LA with Ian and Anthony and films some behind the scenes of Rewind Youtube Style 2012. 212.111.145.20 (talk) 07:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- Anthony has now solidified his relationship with her, her name and their vloging channel are now mentioned. 117Avenue (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
About the vlog shared by Kalel and Anthony: It is said the vlogs are daily, but they are only in daily spurts, and many times not daily at all. It's my opinion that the "daily" be changed to another word or deleted altogether because it is not true. 76.221.158.199 (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- You're right, it's difficult to keep up. I removed "daily" 7 October 2013, but re-added it 2 June 2014. 117Avenue (talk) 08:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Channels
Please do not add fan made channels to the list unless they are endorsed by Smosh. Thanks! Thatwweguy 619 (talk) 02:38, 5 December 2014 (UTC)thatwwegy
- Have you been reading the descriptions of the videos they've been releasing lately? 117Avenue (talk) 05:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2015
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please delete KalelKitten from Smosh's related channels. Kalel is not longer affiliated with Anthony or Smosh. Since Kalel and Anthony broke up Kalel has turned the to her own and no longer interacts with Smosh. Numbur (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
This is an encyclopedia, it explains things both in a historical, and present, context. The channel was once used for vlogs with Anthony, it should be mentioned, as well as other work the duo have done in the past. Also, just because neither Ian or Anthony have appeared in the videos uploaded to that channel recently, does not mean Kalel no longer interacts with Smosh. "Shut Up! Cartoons" recently released a video, promoting the fact that Kalel voiced a character.[8] 117Avenue (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Schedule
There are now seven channels, the same number of days in the week. Should the schedule remain as is, or list the channels vertically? 117Avenue (talk) 04:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2015
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please note that the weekly show Smosh Pit Weekly has ended and will be replaced by a new show starting next week. Source: Smosh 2nd Channel on Youtube 120.62.2.106 (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 17:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2015
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to change the view status from 4.9 billion to 5.0 billion, as they are the amount of views as of December 5, 2015 Kiwichenier (talk) 12:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done (t) Josve05a (c) 00:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Smosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130405115119/http://ewallstreeter.com:80/smosh-passes-ray-william-johnson-as-most-subscribed-youtube-channel-6378 to http://ewallstreeter.com/smosh-passes-ray-william-johnson-as-most-subscribed-youtube-channel-6378/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130409201053/http://www.starcount.com:80/chart/social-star-awards-2013-shortlist/2443dfbc-9c7b-11e2-8b70-12314104b16c/today to http://www.starcount.com/chart/social-star-awards-2013-shortlist/2443dfbc-9c7b-11e2-8b70-12314104b16c/today
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Request to edit page for addition of information regarding EVERY [BLANK] EVER and PART TIMERS
Please allow me to edit the page. Thanks Oozal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oozal (talk • contribs) 16:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done it's not clear what changes you'd like to make to the article. Please be specific. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2016
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, my request is that in the section in which is says: "Over the course of the next few years, Smosh began to diversify. They started making short YouTube skits, such as their annual video series Food Battle[16] and That Damn Neighbor." be changed to: "Over the course of the next few years, Smosh began to diversify. They started making short YouTube skits, such as their annual video series Food Battle[16], in which Ian and Anthony compare foods at doing every day tasks. Another seires Smosh did was, the That Damn Neighbor series, where a strange appearing neighbor causes havoc for two county neighbors." DeWarioFreak (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- That seems like unnecessary detail to me. I agree that their content can be better explained, but two specific series' isn't the way to go. 117Avenue (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with 117Avenue, that kind of detail would be better saved for a separate list of Smosh series in its own section. Deus vult! Crusadestudent (talk) 07:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2016
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi. I am requesting two things. 1. Part Timers be removed from their schedule. Part Timers a few weeks ago or so. It's not longer being done. 2. The part where it says Smosh French's schedule varies should be updated. Their schedule is clearly mention in the link below. https://www.youtube.com/user/TheFrenchSmosh/about Thanks.
DeWarioFreak (talk) 06:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- According to their about page, the main videos are uploaded every Sunday, and EBEs are uploaded every other Friday. But looking at the video release days in June, the main videos were released on Sunday the 5th, Monday the 13th, Monday the 20th, Wednesday the 29th, and none the week of May 29, and EBEs were released Friday May 20, Friday June 3, Saturday June 18, and Saturday July 2. I think that isn't a regular schedule like the other channels. 117Avenue (talk) 01:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Change treatment of Smosh as a "duo"
This article still describes Smosh as a duo, but several new members have joined in the last year or two; there hasn't been a video featuring only Ian and Anthony for a long time. "Duo" is no longer accurate. Someone please get on this. Deus vult! Crusadestudent (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Do you think the article should be about the two founders, the cast, the YouTube channel, or the production company? There are several definitions of Smosh. 117Avenue (talk) 03:31, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's obviously not just the channel, they've got several that are all clearly part of "Smosh", and this article would be back to stub territory if all that were deleted. I think it should be about the "comedy group" instead of the (former) "comedy duo"; that would allow for the article to reflect that members have come and (potentially) gone over time, like with the Journey (band) page (and probably many others). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crusadestudent (talk • contribs) 07:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think in order to avoid turning the article into original research, on what Smosh is, we should defer to sources discussing it. From what I've seen, news articles discussing Smosh have focused on the two, and saying they run a company. Have you seen sources that refer to the larger group as Smosh? I know that the article, as it is currently written, can not handle explaining a member leaving. 117Avenue (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, I haven't seen other sources refer to the whole group, but I haven't seen any sources besides themselves talk about them at all. What I have seen is in several of their recent "fan prank" videos, when "Smosh" shows up, it's not just the original duo but the whole group. idk how much of a "source" that really is, but it's something. I'll be on the lookout for reliable sources on this. Deus vult! Crusadestudent (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see both the duo and the squad calling the squad "Smosh squad" in both video titles and while talking. 117Avenue (talk) 04:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- No, I haven't seen other sources refer to the whole group, but I haven't seen any sources besides themselves talk about them at all. What I have seen is in several of their recent "fan prank" videos, when "Smosh" shows up, it's not just the original duo but the whole group. idk how much of a "source" that really is, but it's something. I'll be on the lookout for reliable sources on this. Deus vult! Crusadestudent (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think in order to avoid turning the article into original research, on what Smosh is, we should defer to sources discussing it. From what I've seen, news articles discussing Smosh have focused on the two, and saying they run a company. Have you seen sources that refer to the larger group as Smosh? I know that the article, as it is currently written, can not handle explaining a member leaving. 117Avenue (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's obviously not just the channel, they've got several that are all clearly part of "Smosh", and this article would be back to stub territory if all that were deleted. I think it should be about the "comedy group" instead of the (former) "comedy duo"; that would allow for the article to reflect that members have come and (potentially) gone over time, like with the Journey (band) page (and probably many others). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crusadestudent (talk • contribs) 07:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree; Smosh is no longer a duo, no matter how you look at it. Sure, they’re the founders, but this article says that Smosh is a duo which consists of Anthony and Ian and not that Smosh consists of many more persons than just Anthony and Ian.
―PapíDimmi (talk) 03:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)- How do you look at it? I only see news articles referring to the two when saying "Smosh", and videos calling all the other members "the Smosh Squad", or "the Smosh Games crew". 117Avenue (talk) 03:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- I agree; Smosh is no longer a duo, no matter how you look at it. Sure, they’re the founders, but this article says that Smosh is a duo which consists of Anthony and Ian and not that Smosh consists of many more persons than just Anthony and Ian.
A New Channel and a New Article?
I was wondering, if in the list of channels, we could add "Smosh Speed Up," because along with the regular Smosh, it has a following. It has over 28 thousand subscribers. It IS fan run, but so is Smosh France.
My other question was, I while ago I wished to add details to a Smosh series, but was told it would be better saved for an article about Smosh's videos. Can we make an article on a list about Smosh's videos?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeWarioFreak (talk • contribs) 17:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes Smosh France is a fan run channel, but it is officially part of the production company, and it has been promoted as a canonical part. A list of Smosh videos would be trivial, and not encyclopedic, in the past the list has been deleted when it was far shorter. 117Avenue (talk) 04:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Anthony Padilla's Name
It is listed on this site that his name is "Daniel Anthony Padilla" even though it is not. He has requested himself that you please take out the Daniel part. Lol0l (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Take out the Daniel in "Daniel Anthony Padilla" Meg.simp02 (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Padilla's name is properly referenced, and I believe it is a valuable piece of information for an encyclopedia, as all bio articles start with the person's birth name. You can find more on the policy at WP:BLP, and if you would like another party to review this article start a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 02:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- @SNUGGUMS: The reference for Padilla's name only states his legal name at birth, we don't know what his legal name is now. You found my revision to imply that he had changed his name, and I find your revision to imply that we have a reference for his current legal name, and that he commonly goes by 'Daniel'. Is there a way we can come to a compromise? 117Avenue (talk) 02:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Birth names are part of one's identity unless something comes along later in life specifically indicating otherwise. Per MOS:BIRTHNAME, one's birth name is to be included within opening sentence even if not what he or she commonly goes by. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- No, it says the subject's full name should be given in the lead sentence, not birth name. Also, your revision does not indicate that he commonly goes by Anthony, are you going to change this? 117Avenue (talk) 04:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Birth names are part of one's identity unless something comes along later in life specifically indicating otherwise. Per MOS:BIRTHNAME, one's birth name is to be included within opening sentence even if not what he or she commonly goes by. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Minor edits
Hi. I'm requesting two things be changed on this article.
The first would be in the part where it says Channels, then Smosh, it needs to be changed from "starring Noah Grossman, Ian Hecox, Keith Leak II, Courtney Miller, Anthony Padilla, Olivia Sui, and Shayne Topp." to "starring Anthony Padilla, Ian Hecox, Courtney Miller, Olivia Sui, Keith Leak, Shayne Topp and Noah Grossman (as well as a few other actors, including Ryan Todd and Lee Eisenhower)."
I request these edits, because this is the official order Smosh has written when they appear in the videos. They can be seen below in the description. It never seems to change, and Ian and Anthony should listened in front of the Smosh Squad. Plus Ryan Todd and Lee Eisenhower appear from time to time (including this year).
My second recommendation is that it says below in the same section, "Grossman,[47] Miller,[48] Sui,[49] and Topp[50] also have their own channels, which are not considered part of the Smosh roster."
Keith is not included here, even though he has his own channel. He must be added.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeWarioFreak (talk • contribs) 21:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- The order never seems to change because they have a template that they use every time. I don't see how that makes it an "official order". They are all actors, and they all act in these videos, so I don't understand why "Ian and Anthony should be listened in front of the Smosh Squad", I think alphabetical is a fair way to list actors. Yes Keith has a channel, but he has not posted anything, so what would we be directing readers to? 117Avenue (talk) 03:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2017
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
DashRaspBerry (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
All I want to do is change the photo and total views number
- Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. — IVORK Discuss 21:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2017
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As of June 14, 2017, Anthony Padilla is no longer part of Smosh SkyRising (talk) 19:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose this article in Variety is a reliable source. --2A02:FE1:3002:E201:0:0:0:8 (talk) 00:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Yes it is. I will insert that into the article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose this article in Variety is a reliable source. --2A02:FE1:3002:E201:0:0:0:8 (talk) 00:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Smosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AnTRXc8w?url=http://www.news10.net/video/1175024043001/1/SMOSH-turns-sketch-comedy-into-cash to http://www.news10.net/video/1175024043001/1/SMOSH-turns-sketch-comedy-into-cash
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://winners.webbyawards.com/2009/online-film-video/general-film-categories/experimental-weird - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130630210850/http://winners.webbyawards.com/2010/online-film-video/general-film-categories/viral to http://winners.webbyawards.com/2010/online-film-video/general-film-categories/viral
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130520082321/http://winners.webbyawards.com/2013/online-film-video/general-film-categories/branded-entertainment-short-form to http://winners.webbyawards.com/2013/online-film-video/general-film-categories/branded-entertainment-short-form
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608235557/http://stcommunities.straitstimes.com/music/2013/05/23/social-star-awards-2013-list-winners to http://stcommunities.straitstimes.com/music/2013/05/23/social-star-awards-2013-list-winners
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2018
This edit request to Smosh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Smoshy12345 (talk) 08:35, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
We Have Created An Indian Channel Of Smosh So We Want To Add That. With Permission
Not done (at least not yet); if you mean Draft:Indian Smosh, then we don't link to drafts within mainspace, and that's quite an incomplete draft. That should be fleshed out with citations as well as probably other details before it could feasibly be moved from draft space to main space. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)