Talk:Society of St. Peter the Apostle

Catholicism Low‑importance

Society of St. Peter the Apostle is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Requested move 29 November 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Calidum 14:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Society of St. Peter the Apostle → Society of Saint Peter the Apostle – Readability, per WP:CONSISTENCY with Saint Peter. Chicbyaccident (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 03:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. At a quick look I get 85,100 ghits for the current name and only 129 for the proposed, some of which are the article itself and pages which use both names. And I find the rationale unconvincing... both are quite readable, and there's no need for this sort of consistency IMO. So I'd just move on. But it could I guess be relisted to see whether there's any better evidence either way. Andrewa (talk) 19:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.