Talk:Spratly Islands dispute

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spratly Islands dispute article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Southeast Asia: Brunei High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Brunei (assessed as High-importance).

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vietnam Mid‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Spratly Islands was copied or moved into Spratly Islands dispute with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Islets occupied by each country

According to the infobox in our article, there are 36 islets in the Spratly Islands. The islets occupied by each country are as follows:

1. Philippines – 11 islets

2. Vietnam – 9 islets

3. China (PRC) – 7 islets

4. Malaysia – 6 islets

5. Taiwan (ROC) – 2 islets

6. Brunei – 1 islet

According to this website, there are 35 islets in the Spratly Islands. The islets occupied by each country are as follows:

1. Vietnam – 21 islets

2. China (PRC) – 8 islets

3. Philippines – 5 islets

4. Taiwan (ROC) – 1 islet (Zhongzhou Reef is included as a part of Taiping Island)

5. Brunei – 0 islets

6. Malaysia – 0 islets

There is no source for our infobox. Saying the Philippines occupies most islets doesn't seem to be correct. I remember reading an article about the Spratly Islands dispute and it states that the vast majority of the islets are occupied by Vietnam. The information provided by the link seems to be more accurate about the number of islets occupied by Vietnam, but stating that Malaysia occupies 0 islets also doesn't seem to be correct. Could anyone provide a more accurate source for this issue? 2001:8003:9008:1301:796B:198E:C28E:A09B (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short description is wrong

The short description is wrong or an oversimplification. The dispute over the Spratly Islands is not simply just between China and the Southeast Asian countries and that's it. Instead, it involves multiple countries disputing one other with overlapping claims, including China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan. And hypothetically if you took China out of the dispute today, the Spratly Islands dispute would still be active and ongoing due to the overlapping claims from other countries. As Vietnam opposes Taiwan's claims, and the Philippines disputes the claims of Vietnam and Taiwan, both of which claim the entire Spratly Islands. I don't know how to change the short description but it currently overlook the complexities of the dispute and writes it as "Territorial dispute between China and Southeast Asian countries". Which is wrong as it creates a very skewed understanding. Can someone fix it? 49.180.183.134 (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just an update: I figured out how to correct short description by editing via source editing. So I already just modified it to reflect the full complexity of the dispute which is composed of multiple dimensions, and not just limited to a single dimension. Though if anyone thinks that's wrong, then you can talk about it here. 49.180.183.134 (talk) 07:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes excellent point(s). Was hardly neutral as written. Its very hard to keep such controversial articles neutral and write concise short descriptions that are not oversimplifications or that do not annoy someone with a CoI. ChaseKiwi (talk) 10:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South China Sea

There is presently no evidence of consensus that name of sea is West Philippines Sea. This topic has come up recently also at Talk:Kalayaan, Palawan and has multiple other historic discussions on articles relevant to dispute. ChaseKiwi (talk) 05:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time line of other events

Can I suggest that this is not very useful, repeats earlier information in page mainly, and almost all content could be moved or deleted (if unreferenced) without loss of cited information to Timeline of the South China Sea dispute as long as my just added wikilink to this article is kept. However I do note that the timeline has been used recently for Spratley specific events which do not appear presently in such detail in the other timeline on page Timeline of the South China Sea dispute. Can a consensus be reached that we rename to Timeline Spratley specific events and remove most of timeline as way forward. ChaseKiwi (talk) 15:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal Unreliable source flag

The removal of several long standing 2016 {{Unreliable source?}} markers with regard to one news organ source was done without discussion or evidence that this source was reliable at the time statements made. I have reverted (marking each incident with the 2016 reason) and created this section in talk so as to allow justification with evidence. As per top of this page the subject matter is controversial and so it may be appropriate to use POV sources that are essentially primary sources, but not overtly so, when there are no better primary, secondary or tertiary sources. It is possible that the editor concerned did not realise this action removed the Category:All articles lacking reliable references which is quite likely to apply here given the controversy. ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]