Talk:Spratly Islands dispute
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spratly Islands dispute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Spratly Islands was copied or moved into Spratly Islands dispute with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Nanshan Island on map is wrong[edit]
Nanshan Island is Phillipine-occupied, not China-occupied. Please fix this and double-check the other islands.
You can use this map for comparison: http://www.philstar.com/news-feature/2016/03/02/1558763/what-we-know-about-jackson-atoll-disputed-sea
162.237.228.60 (talk) 04:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Spratly Islands dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113222152/http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=10799 to http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=10799
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140814162557/http://www.roc-taiwan.org/LV/ct.asp?xItem=372040&ctNode=7925&mp=507 to http://www.roc-taiwan.org/LV/ct.asp?xItem=372040&ctNode=7925&mp=507
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2010%2F4%2F27%2Fbusiness%2F6136931&sec=business
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517120553/https://ajw.asahi.com/article/asia/around_asia/AJ2011110916910 to http://ajw.asahi.com/article/asia/around_asia/AJ2011110916910
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517153540/http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/index.php/en/news/world/18640-malaysia-splits-with-asean-on-china-sea-threat to http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/index.php/en/news/world/18640-malaysia-splits-with-asean-on-china-sea-threat
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151019120244/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-slams-china-s/2200744.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-slams-china-s/2200744.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517152216/http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?cid=1701&MainCatID=17&id=20140513000104 to http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?cid=1701&MainCatID=17&id=20140513000104
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517152216/http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?cid=1701&MainCatID=17&id=20140513000104 to http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?cid=1701&MainCatID=17&id=20140513000104
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106210603/http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/y05-19.xls to http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/y05-19.xls
- Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20130616125220/http://community.middlebury.edu/~scs/docs/Li%20and%20Li-The%20Dotted%20Line%20on%20the%20Map.pdf with https://web.archive.org/web/20160105091433/http://community.middlebury.edu/~scs/docs/Li%20and%20Li-The%20Dotted%20Line%20on%20the%20Map.pdf on http://community.middlebury.edu/~scs/docs/Li%20and%20Li-The%20Dotted%20Line%20on%20the%20Map.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Addition of "military" section in "reason" part of the article.[edit]
@Pdfpdf: I added the section into the "reason" paragraph because in the report it is perceived that the mentioned nation is trying to strategically utilize the group of islands for military buildup purpose, and the attempts to utilize the group of islands for military buildup purpose is perceived as part of a reason why the nation would like to have higher control on these islands.
In other words, I believe it mean that it would like to develop its military force SO THAT it is now having a stronger voice on the dispute, instead of building up militarily to response to the dispute., and thus I think it should be stay within the reason section of the paragraph.C933103 (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- @C933103: Thanks for the explanation. I'll give the matter more thought and get back to you (here). Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
English?[edit]
This is the English-language version of Wikipedia, and it is supposed to be a sort of encyclopedia. Writing articles in broken English is hardly the best way to lead people to take your views seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.42.143.11 (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Islets occupied by each country[edit]
According to the infobox in our article, there are 36 islets in the Spratly Islands. The islets occupied by each country are as follows:
1. Philippines – 11 islets
2. Vietnam – 9 islets
3. China (PRC) – 7 islets
4. Malaysia – 6 islets
5. Taiwan (ROC) – 2 islets
6. Brunei – 1 islet
According to this website, there are 35 islets in the Spratly Islands. The islets occupied by each country are as follows:
1. Vietnam – 21 islets
2. China (PRC) – 8 islets
3. Philippines – 5 islets
4. Taiwan (ROC) – 1 islet (Zhongzhou Reef is included as a part of Taiping Island)
5. Brunei – 0 islets
6. Malaysia – 0 islets
There is no source for our infobox. Saying the Philippines occupies most islets doesn't seem to be correct. I remember reading an article about the Spratly Islands dispute and it states that the vast majority of the islets are occupied by Vietnam. The information provided by the link seems to be more accurate about the number of islets occupied by Vietnam, but stating that Malaysia occupies 0 islets also doesn't seem to be correct. Could anyone provide a more accurate source for this issue? 2001:8003:9008:1301:796B:198E:C28E:A09B (talk) 14:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class Southeast Asia articles
- High-importance Southeast Asia articles
- C-Class Brunei articles
- High-importance Brunei articles
- Brunei work group articles
- WikiProject Southeast Asia articles
- C-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Malaysia articles
- Mid-importance Malaysia articles
- WikiProject Malaysia articles
- C-Class Philippine-related articles
- Mid-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles
- C-Class Taiwan articles
- Mid-importance Taiwan articles
- WikiProject Taiwan articles
- C-Class Vietnam articles
- Mid-importance Vietnam articles
- All WikiProject Vietnam pages