Talk:Stefanie Scott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Notability[edit]

An editor removed the notability tag with the summary, "She has done a number notable projects and currently has a regular role in TV series, That passes WP:ENT to me." She has one apparently significant role, in A.N.T. Farm. WP:ENT calls for "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". There is no evidence of a significant "cult" following or that she "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." Please explain how you feel this passes. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I feel she now clearly meets the criteria - significant role in a major motion picture ("No Strings Attached") plus she's one of the lead actors in a TV series (A.N.T. Farm). Speedy is definitely out for this article - if you feel it shouldn't be here, put it up for AfD. Tabercil (talk) 02:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
That "significant role" in No Strings Attached isn't mentioned in the plot summary of that article, nor is she one of the 19 people listed in the cast. If that's all there is, it's off to AfD. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 71.134.33.41, 5 September 2011[edit]


71.134.33.41 (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Not done: Nothing has been requested. — Status {talkcontribs  04:14, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Stefanie Scot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Stefanie Scot.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Correction: Deleted as a blatant copyright violation. Tabercil (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Stefanie Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Downscaling Discography Section[edit]

Stefanie Scott is mainly an actress yet her sparse discography takes up nearly a third of her page when it isn't even what she focuses on. I would recommend changing this to a quick blurb about past experiences maybe, but as it stands it feels way too detailed on a topic that doesn't really focus on her true career. I'd suggest cropping it down to a paragraph that highlights the most notable items but not every single thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmashEnigma (talkcontribs) 04:43, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

How do you propose to "downscale" it? It's already pretty minimalist, identifying the works and dates. TJRC (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
(Note; SmashEnigma added "I'd suggest cropping it down to a paragraph that highlights the most notable items but not every single thing" after I asked what his proposal was. It was not there when I asked.)
We don't generally delete sourced accurate info. I see an anon IP editor has made this edit which I think addresses it nicely. TJRC (talk) 16:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)