Talk:Stephanie von Hohenlohe
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stephanie von Hohenlohe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|A fact from Stephanie von Hohenlohe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 10 March 2006. The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
Fair use rationale for Image:Hitlers Spy Schad book.jpg
Image:Hitlers Spy Schad book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Her son Franz Joseph
Her son Franz Joseph part 2
He was still alive in Paris as of 2009. I heard from usually reliable society sources that he admitted to having a natural son. Does anyone know if this comment is to be found in print? Ladynabakov (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Needs citations and page numbers
Apparently some editors have been working from the Schad book and maybe the other. They need to provide inline citations for their assertions, especially more controversial material. These should include page numbers, not just the book as a source. Parkwells (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)