Jump to content

Talk:Subdivisions of Bristol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:EH icon.png

[edit]

Image:EH icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dundry

[edit]

I note Dundry has been added to this article, but I'm not sure if it is appropriate. Dundry is definitely in Somerset not Bristol. If this one is in then a whole host of other places in North Somerset & Bath and North East Somerset could also be in included. What do others think?— Rod talk 10:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Dundry should be here either. The other non-Bristol places listed on this article are all part of the Bristol conurbation, so there is some logic to them being there, but there is clear space between Bristol and Dundry so I think it needs to go. — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 10:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]