Talk:Taapsee Pannu

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taapsee Pannu article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Taapsee Pannu has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 3, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in February 2021.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Is she a Jat?[edit]

Is she a Jat Sikh?? Because the links provided do not specify that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.119.146 (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

She has done Engineering in Computers and science from Guru Teg Bahadur Institue of Techonology, New Delhi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.242.186 (talk) 10:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Today Taapse tweeted saying this article contains considerable amount of error. Am not sure how to call for help, Can some one help. Thanks!

-Karthik Sripal (talk) 19:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- This is the Shortest Good Article i`ve ever seen. shorter than this, any one ? DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 13:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

File:Tapsee (2).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Tapsee (2).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Film.bollywoodspace[edit]

The user's edits are totally disruptive. He keeps removing sourced stuff, image and categories and adds irrelevant stuff such as "nicknames" without any discussion. He is possibly a sockpuppet of User:Bollywoodblog. He never listens any of my explanations. —Commander _{(Ping me)} 09:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should probably discount the Sockpuppet thing (because User:Bollywoodblog) was notified of a username policy violation, and its probable that he's abandoning that account (if another edit is done from the old account, then probably an SPI is in order). Report him to ANI if you feel it is pure vandalism. Otherwise take to ANI. Lynch 7 09:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA without Photograph?[edit]

I am surprised to see that a BLP is GA without even a single photograph. --Anbu121 (talk me) 15:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a requirement to have pictured in GAs especially when free images are not available. Anyways, an image has been added now. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Image[edit]

Proposing this new image for consensus. I think this is better. neo (talk) 14:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No issues! However, you could have uploaded the full image (without cropping). —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 15:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama has watermarked this image. Images with watermarks are allowed but discouraged on wikipedia because image with watermark looks shabby or advt of copyright holder. Thanks! neo (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That shouldn't be a problem as watermarks can be removed at the request made by ourselves. You can crop, enhance, do whatever on the file and use it under different versions so that the original file can still be used for some purposes in the project. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article using first name?[edit]

Why is the article using first name to refer to her? Shouldn't it be Pannu as per WP:Surname.- Managerarc™^talk 15:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pannu is not a patronymic, so referring to her by that name should not be bad, although she is prominently known by her first name. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of people are prominently known by their first name but rules must be followed here.- Managerarc™^talk 19:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In Anando Brahma she acted as the ghost and her character is written unknown in the box beside it, please change it 49.207.73.222 (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks! -- irn (talk) 14:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change Taapsee's character's spelling in Judwaa 2 from "Samaira" to "Samaara", on the page of Judwaa 2 it's written the same. Taapsee did the role of ghost in Anando Brahma and there it's written unknown so change it to "Ghost" too NAMAN (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks! -- irn (talk) 14:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reassesment (Removal) of the article from GA list[edit]

This article has many problems and has cleanup banners, such as {{Cleanup}} and {{unreferenced}}. THerefore, the request may be completed by honourable authorities as I am new user. Thanks, Indianpoliti (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequent note: user was blocked as a sockpuppet later the same day; request has been removed. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re-assesment[edit]

(talk) 10:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As per the Wikipedia guidelines as it has been templates like ^{[citation needed]} and

So how it can be a WP:GA. गहराई (talk) 10:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

गहराई, Indianpoliti, there have been dozens of edits since you each posted your reassessment requests (but never finished them properly), and the templates you were concerned about have been removed from the article after those edits dealt with a number of issues. Are you satisfied that the problems have been addressed, or do you still believe there should be a reassessment? If you are satisfied, then the request templates above should be removed. Thank you for looking at this again. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further investigation, I've discovered that both Indianpoliti and गहराई have been blocked as sockpuppets of Amrapahal Pahanswan. I have therefore removed their reassessment requests, but have left the sections as a reminder in case a third sock request is made. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image[edit]

2017
2018

IP has been constantly changing the image to 2017 one ([1], [2], [3]) but I don't see how it's better. The subject's face is barely recognizable given the small size of the image and the legs are drawing more attention than the face. I think we can retain 2018, it's face-centric and more neutral looking i.e., without distracting makeup, lights, and background. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 04:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey this 2018 image already exists in her filmography category. So I've added another 2018 image of hers in infobox ([4]) in which the subject's face is entirely on focus. Stormy Shrestha (talk) 07:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021

2021

Added a new picture [5] as the last one was taken in 2018. Stormy Shrestha (talk) 09:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first two were taken at a BH party or event. The last, that you uploaded, was from an article. The license that BH allows some of their images to be uploaded under a CC-BY-SA license only applies to party/event pictures, not article photoshoots. Ravensfire (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021

2021

Added a new picture [6] as the last one was taken in 2018. Stormy Shrestha (talk) 03:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same event as prior image and it has the EXACT same problems. Ravensfire (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to add the following image: Reasons being: 1. This one seems to be the most recent photograph of the subject. 2. It primarily focuses on her face. Will this be allowed? [~~] GaiusAugustine (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Taapsee Pannu at the Actors' Roundtable 2021 (4).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need to Change the Image of Tapsee Panu[edit]

hi, Dhanraj Here from Tapsee Panu's Team, i need help with updating the image of Tapsee and add new content aswell , Please help me out with this Dhanraj2000 (talk) 07:30, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]