Jump to content

Talk:Tanya Huff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fiona Patton

[edit]

Fiona Patton is notable, as an author in her own right, and the wikilink on her name should probably be returned as soon as someone constructs a page for her -- I'll do it soon if no one else does. --Ambyr 17:57, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done :) Feel free to review and revise Fiona Patton  ThStev 06:39, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Books' Content

[edit]

The article introduces the author and lists her books, but it doesn't actually give much indication as to what she writes about. I'm not familiar with her work, though. Could someone please expand? – Zawersh 22:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Character's Name

[edit]

Isn't the protagonist known as "Vicki Nelson" and with an official first name "Victoria"? Monado 05:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it was stated in the third novel that only her mother calls her "Victoria". You are right that she is usually referred to as "Vicki" in the text, though "Victory", her police colleagues' nickname for her, is much more distinctive and I believe that's what I've seen in marketing references. I don't have an authoritative opinion at the moment. Avt tor 07:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited the Victory Nelson books description to show that Vicki leaving the police force and meeting Henry was backstory that happened before the first book. I didn't get into Tony's story (that Tony was actually Vicki's stool pigeon, and didn't meet Henry until half way throught he first book)140.198.2.75 19:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. I always got the feeling that Vicki and Tony were a (young) date that didn't work out.. more his interest in her, in exchange for his muscle or info or whatever. LOVE Henry, the vamp, thus not as interested in her. Frankly, I liked the book with the werewolf family the best. --leahtwosaints (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valor's trial

[edit]

Amazon has Valor's trial as 4th in the series due for publication June 2008. It wasn't in the bibliography on her official site though. 9 March 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwykes (talkcontribs) 10:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

The list of her works was recently split off from this article. Neither article is so large that such a split is necessary or even desirable. 71.204.176.201 (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merge. It was a compromise vs the blood books each having their own articles. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge. E.g., see [Bernard Cornwell] and [David Weber] and the links to their series and THEN to their books. They are listed as start class, but I think that's because no one bothers to review. The Cornwell nesting of links I think is particularly well done (I DON'T know about the book articles themselves, but author and series articles are good. For Feature Article, not [J.R.R. Tolkien], [Lord of the Rings] and then [Fellowship of the Rings], etc. I'd at least suggest including a blurb/book list for each series in the author's article and then a separate article on each series, though not necessarily each book. IMHO (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also look at Terry Pratchett and Discworld, though the latter is only one series, it is in a separate listing. Both the author and the series articles have B ratings. IMHO (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC). P.S. I should note that while one series is separate, there is still a decent write up in his article, that being the point. So even if any series gets a sufficient writeup (ala Pratchett's 20+ series write up), there should still be more material on the author's page. IMHO (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

[edit]

Under the information for Enchantment Emporium, there's a Citation Needed tag. I found a link confirming that information, the author's blog making that announcement. But I've never edited Wikipedia before and couldn't figure out what went where. Rather than screw up the main page, I'll leave the link here and hope for someone more experienced.

http://andpuff.livejournal.com/201868.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.37.5 (talk) 01:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tanya Huff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tanya Huff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tanya Huff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]