Talk:Thoma I

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: India Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India.

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as High-importance).

Oriental Orthodoxy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move (previous)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Neduvelilmathew, Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(clergy)#Syriac_bishops is clear on this; if you believe this is not correct then the best place to resolve your concerns would be at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions. fish&karate 15:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

– Relisted. Favonian (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Names of this ancient historical church clergy at the higher level is not given in the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (clergy). These new titles given to these Malankara Metropolitans and bishops are ridiculus and insulting. I am a member of this church. So the reverting. Neduvelilmathew (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, the naming convention does recomend against using "Mar", here: Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(clergy)#Syriac_bishops. However, in these cases the bishops are rarely referred to as "Thoma I, Thoma II", etc. without the honorific "Mar".Cúchullain ^t/c 20:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the naming convention is stated; Wikipedia is secular and does not use titles such as Saint, King, Queen, Sir, Sri, Guru, Mar, Bishop, Archbishop, Metropolitan, His Royal Highness which various adherents and citizens of the particular religion or country may well commonly use; for saints of any colour, creed or denomination see Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(clergy)#Saints. No insult is intended or implied in this naming, and the commonly-used honorifics and honours may be given in the article body, as the disputed articles now do. (Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:25, 26 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Yes, but Wikipedia also uses common names. The problem here is that there are few if any sources that refer to these individuals as "Thoma I", "Thoma II", etc.--Cúchullain ^t/c 21:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mild oppose Note that Mar Dinkha IV was just moved for this very reason. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Again though, doing the same thing here would be sticking with an arbitrary Wikipedia convention over common use in the sources. Few if any sources refer to these men as "Thoma I", "Thoma VII", etc.--Cúchullain ^t/c 12:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nor do sources refer to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland simply as Elizabeth II as we for consistency rightly do Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many sources refer to "Elizabeth II".[1] The difference here is that few if any sources refer to these people as "Thoma I", "Thoma II" etc. Wikipedia shouldn't be making up its own names.Cúchullain ^t/c 12:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support, no idea who these people are, but Google Books confirms that they always seem to be referred to with the "Mar".--Kotniski (talk) 09:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Marthoma

Hi, Cuchullain,

Your response is much appreciated. Thank you.

Marthoma (Mar Thoma in English), is the name given to the head of the Malankara Church at the time of his consecration. Head of this Church is addressed only by the name, ‘’Marthoma’’ and not by any other name. Even their parents call them, ‘’Mar Thoma’’. Their baptismal names are unknown and giving them the name Thoma by Wikipedia is not correct and acceptable.

I did not know that Wikipedia is authorized to change the names of people according to some ‘’Naming Conventions’’ that they make. Respected people must always be respected. The name Elizabeth is very common. Her Majesty should be respected and her name should be given correctly. The name Thoma is very common in Kerala. ‘’Mar Thoma’’ should be respected and the name should not be changed.Neduvelilmathew (talk) 17:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: all moved Kotniski (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this needs to be reopened, as move-warring has clouded the issue. It seems from the above discussion that no-one has yet countered the claim that the current names (without "Mar") are simply not used. If that is the case, then we absolutely can't use those names - if there's a guideline that tells us to, then it means there's something wrong with the guideline, not with the proposed titles. As was said somewhere above, Wikipedia does not make stuff up. Can someone who supports the shorter names provide some sources to support them? If not, then we need the articles to be moved and the guideline updated.Kotniski (talk) 07:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I looked up bishop "Thoma I" -wikipedia. He is always "Mar Thoma I". Kauffner (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The guideline on Syriac bishops is, well, a guideline, while Use common names is a policy. We shouldn't adhere blindly to arbitrary guidelines in spite of the fact that these names are never used.--Cúchullain ^t/c 12:41, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support move. Follow the overwhelmingly more common usage to ensure that the article has a title that will be recognizable to readers. Although we don't generally include honorifics in the title, there are nevertheless cases where honorifics are useful as part of the common name (eg. Mother Teresa, Saint Peter etc.) Jafeluv (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Mar Thoma VI is more properly known as Mar Dionysius I, so I have already moved that article.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seems we're all agreed, so I've started to move the remaining pages. Only numbers I and II have not been done yet, as they're move-protected; hopefully will be done soon.--Kotniski (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I've completed the last two moves. Ged UK 21:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mar Thoma I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mar Dionysius IV which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Erzdiakon Thomas.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thoma 1 is from kalli family

Mar Thoma 1 is not from pakalomattom family. His actual name is Thomas de Campo means Parambil Thoma Lathamar and he was a couscin of Alexander da Campo of kalli family Tony kokkat (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Mar Thoma I

The image used in the info box is of Giwargis of Christ. J.Stalin S ^Talk 07:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Thanks for the heads up. ~ Pbritti (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]