Jump to content

Talk:Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expansion

[edit]

I own every Tomb Raider game except The Last Revelation and Angel of Darkness, so unfortunately an update similar to the one the first three Tomb Raider games got will have to wait for a while. Just want do my proper research. In the mean time, anyone else is free to give it a go him/herself of course :) 'll try to finish Tomb Raider Chronicles by the end of the week. Cheers. --Steerpike 13:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This game was ripped apart by IGN. My ex was a big fan of the whole series though, he never mentioned that this game was bad, but he was a little biased to our lady Lara JayKeaton 05:36, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where was the review that gave it 2/10? I've just checked IGN, and the PS1 version got 8.5/10 [1] while the PC version got 7/10 [2].--DaveJB 08:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The part in "reception" about the bug on "race for the iris" confuses me, it first says that you are stuck if you are slower than 3 minutes, then it says that you can open the door anyway, what is it? MMAN2 12:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the whole thing, since if the original info was incorrect it should have been removed completely, and also because it doesn't exactly belong in the reception section anyway. Shrensh 12:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh Idea

[edit]

I have a proposal. I posted some time ago an article that just doesn't fitted with Wikipedia's standards. This is my article: User:Locketudor/Tomb Raider music. I want to split it, remake it and distribued it to all Tomb Raider games. --Tulok 15:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i think you've lost the best part of the series, TLR is my first love for this game, and its really the best one ever been released, its so amazing and versatile... —Preceding unsigned comment added by QuixpeeD (talk contribs) 00:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Times Exclusive Level Expansion/Standalone level

[edit]

The Times newspaper released a Tomb Raider level in which Lara went into Tutankhamun's Tomb to find the Golden Mask. Why isn't this here? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ggctuk (talkcontribs) 15:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I don't think that level has somnething to do with the game, it doesn't folow the story of the real game and the story of this level is poor, that level was made to explore the 'Title Chambers'. I think you could do it anyway with an TR Editor. --Tulok 09:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 2 Land Rovers

[edit]

What kind of land rovers has been used in the game(there was a pick-up and a normal one) ? --Tudor Tulok 17:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Connelly

[edit]

What happen with the Peter Connelly's interview from tombraideranniversary.com ? Tuloc (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC) –  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  16:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PC Player sales analysis

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tomb Raider: The Last Revelation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CollectiveSolidarity (talk · contribs) 21:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take a look at this. Ping me if you don't hear from me by Friday. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 21:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

pass

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    pass
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    pass
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    pass
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    pass
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    pass
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    pass
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    pass

Notes. There were a few minor things that I changed with the prose. Gametrailers on YouTube is an odd choice, but I guess it is acceptable as a source. Aside from these points, the article seems good for an instant  Pass. Good work. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

[edit]

I culled a major expansion of the Reception section, and consequently removed several references of reviews from contemporary magazines and websites. To avoid them being lost to the annals of revision history, I'll list them here for future use. Thanks to Angeldeb82 for their talented detective work. Rhain (he/him) 13:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews