Talk:Torpedo...Los!

Torpedo...Los! has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
September 18, 2013	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 23, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Big Painting No. 6 set a record for highest auction price for a painting by a living artist and Torpedo...Los! set a record for price for a Roy Lichtenstein work?

Current status: Good article

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has failed an A-Class review.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Torpedo...Los!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is a bit lacking. Can it be expanded a bit?
- How is it now?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When it last sold in 1989 --> When it was last sold in 1989
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Details --> Description
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Critical commentary --> Reception
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see no other issues with the article. It is well written and sourced.

All issues have been addressed; passing the article! Statυs (talk) 07:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comment

Copyvio in the long quotes in footnotes should be addressed. Author should use original wording rather that quote everything. MathewTownsend (talk) 21:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

concern about copyvio in footnote quotes

I'm concerned that exceptionally long footnotes containing copyrighted matter constitutes copyvio. Examples:

[examples redacted: they are indeed, it seems, copyright violations and repeating them here does not help. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)][reply]

Other articles in this series on Lichtenstein's works also contain long quotes from the same authors. Is this use of copy righted material ok? MathewTownsend (talk) 14:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Long quotes are removed from the article, as well as the non-free tag. This does not, in my opinion, affect the GA status. MathewTownsend, I trust you see now why I did what I did; it's not a question of which violation gets to go first. Drmies (talk) 00:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What you are saying doesn't make sense. If they copyvio is wrong on the talk page, then they are all the more wrong in the article itself, which all the world will see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathewTownsend (talk • contribs)

Sorry? Long quotes are removed from the article. Did you miss these edits? Speaking of "doesn't make sense"--you were concerned that the long quotes were copyvios, then you copied them here, then you restored them after I removed them. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Torpedo...Los!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]