Jump to content

Talk:Wong Sing-chi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) --Mdann52talk to me! 16:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Wong Sing-chiNelson Wong Sing-chi – The guy's English name is "Nelson", so the title should follow Hong Kong's English/Chinese format. George Ho (talk) 07:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I realized this article is copied-and-pasted from Nelson Wong. I contacted WP:REPAIR, so we'll wait. --George Ho (talk) 07:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
History merger is done, and Chinese name is still retained. --George Ho (talk) 15:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anyone in Wikipedia recognize the Chinese name as much as Anglicized name with Chinese surname. --George Ho (talk) 19:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Same reason as with other ones you moved or trying to move, we need to avoid using long titles such as 'Nelson Wong Sing-chi' per WP:TITLE, it should be either 'Nelson Wong (politician)' or just 'Wong Sing-chi', per WP:NC-ZH. TheAvatar (discuss?)
Nelson results twenty-eight articles; Chinese name, fifteen. --George Ho (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I told you in other talk page, Tavatar, the page was "Nelson Wong" until someone changed it to the current title. --George Ho (talk) 00:56, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I changed it from Nelson Wong to Wong Sing-chi because Nelson is hardly used in the media. He is most commonly referred as Wong Sing-chi. Lmmnhn (talk) 09:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
He himself is barely notable, regardless of name. --George Ho (talk) 12:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I have said before, I'm ok with either "Wong Sing-chi" or "Nelson Wong", just not "Nelson Wong Sing-chi" as your request suggested. TheAvatar (discuss?) 16:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps choose either "Wong Sing-chi" or "Nelson Wong" if you oppose the proposed title. --George Ho (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Cold Season, Tavatar: Choose either "Nelson Wong" or "Wong Sing-chi"; don't continue your indecisiveness with opposition to the proposed name. I'll propose next year if the discussion is closed as "no consensus". --George Ho (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There's no indecisiveness, I oppose a move to Nelson Wong Sing-chi. I can't say which is more common with such little sources. --Cold Season (talk) 22:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cold Season, I hope WP:NCUE#No established usage in English-language sources helps you decide. --George Ho (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wong Sing-chi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]