Template talk:Pp-vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Ns:main[edit]

{{editprotected}}

Please change "ns:main" to "ns:0" (ns:main does not work). Also, you might want to change "ns:image" to "ns:6". Also, please change "NAMEPSACE" to "NAMESPACE". Thanks! --- RockMFR 17:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

YesY Done, apart from the ns:image change (it's slightly clearer than ns:6). --ais523 17:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Category[edit]

This template should add pages to Category:Protected against vandalism, either instead of or in addition to Category:ProtectedGurch 15:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

YesY Done Harryboyles 19:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Looks like[edit]

{{editprotected}} Can someone change this so it looks like {{pp-semi-protected}}? 68.101.123.219 01:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Done – 86.133.139.4 10:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Restricting Category:Protected against vandalism to articles, templates and portals ?[edit]

Like Category:Protected against vandalism, for maintenance, I think it would be worthwhile that the template categorizes in Category:Protected against vandalism only articles, templates and portals. They are the most to-be-aware-of, and other pages can be categorized in Category:Protected project pages, etc. The only visible change in the current category is that images will be moved to Category:Protected images. Cenarium (Talk) 02:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Date linking[edit]

It appears that this templarte links the expiry date for autoformatting. As autoformatting has been deprecated for some time, can this linking behaviour be removed? Colonies Chris (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

This should be requested at {{pp-meta}} -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit request[edit]

{{editprotected}} Go to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#WP:Accessability ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done Come back when you have consensus... GFOLEY FOUR— 05:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

"This protection is not an endorsement of the current version"[edit]

As preventing vandalism is technically an endorsement of the current version over vandalized versions, the first sentence should be changed to something like "This protection is not intended to prevent good-faith changes." Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

The reference here is to m:The Wrong Version, which applies to edit wars and suchlike. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
The sentence can also be removed if you think that's a better idea. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Not done: Not sure this is necessary. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Why not? Lophotrochozoa (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 25 August 2013[edit]

Change:

|small={{{small|}}}
|demospace={{{demospace|}}}

To:

|small={{{small|}}}
|right={{{right|}}}
|demospace={{{demospace|}}}

This allows use of the new pp-meta parameter. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposal to convert this template to Lua[edit]

There is currently a proposal to convert this and other protection templates to Lua at Module talk:Protection banner#Proposal to convert all protection templates to use this module. Please join this discussion over there if you are interested. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Link to draft article[edit]

What do people think about including a link to the draft version of an article, if it is fully protected? This would allow collaboration to continue and aid discussion on the talk page. (This first came up at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 15#Draft version.) Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)