I sometimes come to your page and check the edit summaries just to get a laugh! Now stop making me laugh, I'm apparently at war.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
War is very serious. Humor would be inappropriate. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes humor would be very inappropriate. Remember the words of a great wiseman: "You can't fight in here! This is the war room!" -President Merkin Muffley, Dr. Strangelove. Seriously though, you need to stop taking these incidents so personally. It's not good for your bloodpressure. Have you tried kitten huffing?--Fuhghettaboutit 12:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay, so tell me where I went wrong with my Electric Dragon article? I mean, before I posted the abominable image and the bolded text in the beginning. My article was absolutely perfect, and it got deleted 3 times without any notice... I got mad and that's why I did what I did. Because you even deleted my images I had previously uploaded. I don't get it. -bg_sparx
I didn't see the article that was deleted, just the abusive one. The most common reason for speedy deletion, though, is that an article doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Go read them, and see if your article met them. -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Well I don't believe I have broken any of those rules because I copied source from other Wiki pages, available for famous bands like Nine Inch Nails and Mindless Self Indulgence, and I used that source for model, which I strictly followed. Could it be that a user has deleted the article, or can only moderators delete them? Also, I'm still not sure why they deleted the pictures I have uploaded (album covers to which I hold the rights). -bg_sparx
Did you read the guideline I linked to? Because your reply, about using a model from another page, doesn't really have anything to do with notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I looked at your deletion log, and all four times you recreated the article, it was deleted because it was an article about a group that didn't assert notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 00:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I guess the group isn't famous enough, hence, it's obsolete for Wikipedia. Thanks for helping me out with the rules, I'll be on the lookout next time I post here! -bg_sparx
A taskforce dealing with LGBT publications has been proposed. If you are interested in getting involved, consider signing up at the projects' page.
Our core topics list is looking good. It's still a bit slim on LGBT history articles, non-American LGBT media, and important LGBT biographies. Do you have suggestions?
David Shankbone has done an amazing job taking photographs of LGBT celebrities. Thanks David! People interested in collaborating with him and setting up a photography taskforce should contact him or drop a note at the project's talkpage.
The LGBT Portal still needs a bit of love and attention :-). Again, any good quality (free) photos you come across on LGBT articles can be added to the gallery here. Volunteers to help out with the Portal are extremely welcome- make yourselves known on the Portal's talkpage. Updates to the current news items are helpful.
Deputy coordinator elections
WikiProject LGBT studies is looking for new Deputy Coordinators to help out with various essential tasks in organising the project. To nominate yourself or contribute to the discussion, please go to: Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Coordinator/May 2007. The deadline for nominations is May 5 and the elections will last a week after that.
The elections will be pretty simple- everyone just endorses their favourite candidate(s). The three with the most votes at the end of the week are the new deputy coordinators, who will assist Dev920 in keeping the project running.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, just ask Dev920. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let her know.
This month's project newsletter (hand delivered as SatyrTN and Dev920 are away). Best wishes, WjBscribe 03:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for your constructive points, my trouble is I like to delve head first into things and then when I get stuck read the instructions, but yes I will go and read them and try and learn them. The scripts are a bit new to me, I have always used invisionfree & proboard sites.
Gfours 14:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia can be pretty complicated at first, and lord knows I don't have it mastered yet either. Feel free to ask me if you have questions, and if I don't know the answers, there are several wiser people I can direct you toward. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Someone accidentally deleted my whole talk page to add this
If this user didn't adopt such a brusque attitude towards new members, perhaps those new members may be inclined to respond more politely. As it is, he seems to spend all day and all night leaving snarky messages and generally being a meddler. Gordo of the Press Club 10:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
No, there is no excuse for making personal attacks, just as there is no excuse for ignoring repeated warnings and removing speedy deletion tags, as you have done. New members who contribute usefully get welcomed warmly, but new members who ignore the rules and make personal attacks just get blocked. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Frankly, I'd rather there was a proper AfD discussion on the page in question, rather than being speedily removed by someone who appears to have a penchant for the tag. Gordo of the Press Club 10:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
There is a process for disputing a speedy deletion tag. If you read your talk page, you will see this process explained. It's explained again on the tag on the article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
According to the article history, you are the one who removed the {hangon} tag from the article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
My main complaint is that his manner is just not welcoming. Rather than explain why he wanted to tag Mancon, he merely posted a copy-and-paste form letter and on questioning, became agitated and aggressive. Perhaps he needs to take a step back from this site and find something important to get hot and bothered about. Gordo of the Press Club 10:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, we all use standard warnings for non-notable articles that are tagged for speedy deletion. It's a way of keeping us polite. If you don't think Wikipedia is important, that's okay, but then you're the one who is doing something odd by spending so much time on it. I think Wikipedia is important, which is why I spend so much time trying to make it better. Goodbye. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Is this site "Jobsworths R Us" or something? He's the one who seems to be spending all day and night on it. I'm doing other things at the same time... Gordo of the Press Club 11:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
A vandal blanks my talk page to point out the obvious
I don't know how your page originally got on my watchlist, but it often shows up to provide me with entertainment, (sorry, at your expense). I wanted to give you something, so I thought this was kinda cool. Here's a for being featured on my watchlist. You deserve it for all the vandalism, and flack you get. And for being so friggen funny too. LOL. - JeenyTalk 15:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Aw, shucks, thanks. I entertain myself; if others are entertained in the process, well, that's just icing on the doughnut. Cheese on the meatballs. Fudge on the ice cream. Damn, I'm hungry. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
I like glazed, or in Boston, "honey-dipped" [1]), doughnuts, myself. - JeenyTalk 18:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, FisherQueen. I've seen you on Sarah's talk page before but I don't remember if we have ever interacted. I am contacting you for the following reason: I am presently monitoring around 1,675 Hawaii-related articles (and non-articles such as lists, images, and categories). From what I can tell, there seems to be an issue on Talk:Evan Dobelle. Since you know more than I do about the problem, would it be possible for you to contact WPHawaii (the link is at the top of the talk page) and leave the project a brief message on the project talk page? Thanks ever so much for your time. —Viriditas | Talk 01:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure, I'd be happy to. I haven't even been able to persuade the person or people who are repeatedly blanking the paragraph to explain the problem on the talk page; I'd be glad for a few hands to come bring the consensus, especially people who know more about Hawaiian politics than I do. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not absolutely certain, but it looks like we are having the same problem on Colt Brennan, too. Thanks again. —Viriditas | Talk 01:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I've stuck that article on my watchlist, so I can help keep an eye on it. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at this: [2]. 68.5.13.73 (talk·contribs) removed controversial material and added his own comment. In your opinion, should that material be added back in to the article? I'm concerned about applying the policy on biographies of living persons. The ESPN cite was reg. only, and the second cite appears valid. —Viriditas | Talk 03:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Tricky... it isn't directly related to what he's notable for. I think I'd want to see how widely reported it was, how significant to his career, before I decided. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. I'll bring it up on the project page. Thanks again for your time. —Viriditas | Talk 04:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, FQ - have you played with WP:AWB? It's thrilling my little gnomish heart - among other things, it searches categories for misspellings, etc, and then you approve the change. It's MUCH fun. I know you enjoy vandal thwacking, but you can do BOTH with AWB... it runs in the background and beeps when it's ready for you to say yes or no. Just thought it might be something you'd enjoy. Philippe 05:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on 7DS. I do not think that 7DS fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because This is an article about a piece of software, or a software protocall, not a corporation. WP:CSD#A7 is quite stictly limited, and does not apply to software or most other things.. I request that you not re-tag 7DS for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES(talk) 23:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Since that one had been prodded for months and nothing done with it, I wonder if it would be possible to just have an admin delete it? Or should it go through AfD? It's clearly non-notable, small scale, and only theoretical at this point. I readded the prod. Philippe 23:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
If this prod stays on for 5 days, drop me a line, i promise to delete if no one else does under those circs. DES(talk) 01:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I just found that you marked a bunch of newly created articles of questionable value for deletion. I am user:kaysov and have not been active lately. Would you please tell me how you monitor/discover newly created pages? - Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaysov (talk • contribs)
I see that Sceptre has already answered your question, so I'll only add to his answer that you should make sure you understand the criteria, and after you've tagged something for deletion, make sure to leave a polite warning on the user's talk page from the table of warning templates, always signing your notes with four tildes (~~~~). -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip, I kind of forgot the shortcut :) . Here's a related question: how do questionable articles get detected if somebody doesnt catch them on the newpages? Is there anyother special page they appear on? Thanks again - Kesava 16:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
The best way I know of is to catch them on newpages. If they get missed there, they can easily slip through the cracks. Lots of users do Random article patrols- just click on Random article in the left toolbar, read the article that comes up, and if it needs help, wikification, referencing, copyediting, or just plain deletion, do whatever is needed, or tag it with a maintenance tag. -FisherQueen (Talk) 16:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Got it! Is any thing different if the article is tagged with a stub notice? Is deletion process any different? Do they appear on a different special pages list? - Kesava 16:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
'Stub' just means 'really short.' It's unrelated to whether an article is notable or not. Most stubs should not be deleted, though they could be developed and expanded. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate you taking the time to provide some helpful links on the Keith McCready article.
I am not an expert at this, but I am trying to contribute to Wikipedia in the Cue Sport topic, especially as it pertains to American pool players. There are so many missing and not documented, and Wikipedia provides a golden opportunity to record this history of American pool.
I have added references to my page and tried to clean it up, so that it is in the correct tone for an encylopedia article.
I would very much appreciate it if you have any suggestions or advice to help make my contributions in the correct style, tone, et cetera. THANK YOU. RailbirdJAM
I'm impressed with how much you've improved this article; when I noticed you starting to work this morning while I was doing recent-changes patrol; you've done a great job on it. Of course I know virtually nothing about billiards, but I know a user who knows a bit more than I do and who I believe still has this page on his watchlist. Hi, Fuhghettaboutit. I was happy to help you format the pictures. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
WAVING! Just noticed this easter egg. Nice name--Railbird. A true pool player's handle that only others are in the culture will recognize (well I think it also applies to racing but...). McCready, what a character. They always said if he hit the right mix of drugs he was unbeatable. He's a hard guy to write a balanced article about, what with BLP concerns. I've met him a few times, never played him. I'll take a look at the article tomorrow.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
why do u keep taking off true info on the john marshall high school page? i measn come on actuallly students who go to the school are putting true info but u are just deleint it w/o even varifying it or even giving any reason, what the crap?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.216.130.63 (talk • contribs)
The problem with the most recent addition to John Marshall High School (West Virginia) wasn't truth, it was notability. Not everything true is notable; you and your classmates should read the notability guidelines carefully. Your computer science teacher's web page did not appear to meet that guideline, to me. The burden of verification is on you; you are the ones who must add sources verifying new information. If your computer science teacher's web page really has been written about in the newspaper or won a major teaching award, feel free to re-add it, but make sure to include a link to the source. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Please read Template:Copyvio and Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Copyright infringement is not allowed on Wikipedia, and articles with copyright infringements are are blanked with this template or deleted immediately (see also Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion). The template is not to be removed until the issue is resolved. In this case, the issue will be resolved by deleting the infringing revisions, but in the mean time the template is for notifying the editors of that article of the problem and hopefully to clarify the issue for them so they do not post copyrighted material without authorization in the future. —Centrx→talk • 15:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that was totally my mistake... I saw the links and didn't notice the template. That article really, really needs to be deleted, and I apologize with all my heart for mistaking the copyvio template for some vandal blanking the article. I will humbly accept my punishment. Perhaps we can arrange for it to be administered by Uma Thurman... -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you FisherQueen. I am pleased for your advice, and help. Also, thanks a lot for those tags, like the nonsense tag. Dom58! 16:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate the input and comments. I deleted the prod tags and edited the Bio section. Also added Album section. I'm still trying to grasp the format and guidlines etc and hopefully this is closer to what is acceptable. Stykfaktor 16:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I still don't see how this band meets WP:MUSIC guidelines for notability. Also, if you are a member of this band, you have a conflict of interest, and should wait until one of your many fans creates an article based on the available sources. I went ahead and tagged the article for speedy deletion for you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
LOL! Yes it is a real island, but "dyke" and "fag" are more commonly used in the anti-gay sense in the States. In my part of the world, "dyke", especially a "dry stane dyke" refers to a wall, and a "fag" is a cigarette. :) I notice that the "Smylie Channel" could be taken the wrong way as well... --MacRusgail 18:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it was "Smylie Channel" that convinced me that you had made the place up. I'm going to fly to Scotland just so I can say, "So, I was sitting on the dyke with a fag in my mouth..." -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
You appear to be creating very short articles, which don't have any specific sources cited and which aren't grammatically correct, and several of them have been deleted. Maybe, instead of creating new articles, you could get used to the way Wikipedia works by helping improve existing articles. Then you'll have a better idea of what makes a good article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
you're right there really isn't any point considering. I was just archiving it in case the original got vandalised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowbellcity45 (talk • contribs)
All article histories are archived automatically whenever an edit is made. Just click the 'history' tag on any article to see earlier versions.
I know Alexa rankings aren't used for WP:WEB, but it does have a ranking of 4,291. Also, I'd say the site is notable, if for negative reasons, as apparently the player is a spyware haven. The parent comapnt Traffix however does appear it might meet WP:CORP and preraps this belng as a subset of that article? I'm not sure anymore! :) Wildthing61476 21:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Is this article still in consideration of being deleted? Should I rework it a bit more? The site is great and the company in notable. Nikki4u 21:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
It looks like the deletion discussion is still going on; if you have sources that show the notability of the company, you should bring them to the discussion, because no one else has found such sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you please help to recover Steffany Crown improved article and discussion
Hi, There must have been a mistake. We were working on improving Steffany Crown article according to some editors suggestion. Could you please help us recover the lost information? Thanks in advance! Sophie
Stephanie789 11:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Sophie789
I can't see the deleted version, since I'm not an admin, but I checked out the company web site and couldn't see any evidence that this company meets the guidelines at WP:ORG. Have you read WP:COI yet? It isn't appropriate to create an article about your own company; if it is truly notable, then someone else will inevitably create an article about it that will rely on sources and be less susceptible to bias. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Have you ever tried? I was trying to find out about a banned user yesterday - google failed miserably - and in clusty he jumped up out at me.(well not literally, but) I do hope that I am not being a nuisance at the edge of the tea-tree debate - cheers SatuSuro 12:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
If you have an opinion on whether there's a need for Ti-tree to be a separate article from Tea tree, please do chime in, because I'm so angry at the article creator's way of talking to me that I'm having trouble seeing any merit at all to her arguments. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I know a couple of persons who might be interested in venturing in.. I'll try em they are more attuned to the issue I think. cheers SatuSuro 12:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Very sorry I didnt put him on to it earlier - better than a doberman in that sort of situation - hes saved my skin a few times - cheers SatuSuro 13:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
"You have recently recreated or reposted material at Stephen C. Ray which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review." -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SunPark"
Sorry. I'm new at this. I thought it was ok to do so according to this:
"I decided to go ahead and delete that article.
Notability is not fame, but that have received significant coverage.
For example, Competitors who have played in a fully professional league,
or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as
swimming and tennis. If you still disagree with my deletion,
I'll restore the page and bring it to the WP:Articles for deletion section
where the community discusses the articles." -- lucasbfr talk 16:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)"
I am trying my best to go through the right channels of this site to keep this article available for everyone. I meant no disrespect. I simply misunderstood. I'm not that bright.
I am wondering how to do this:
"If you still disagree with my deletion, I'll restore the page and bring it to the WP:Articles for deletion section where the community discusses the articles. -- lucasbfr talk 16:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)"Thanks
Yes, given that message I can see how you'd be confused. You don't need to recreate an article; you can just ask an admin or go to deletion review to have it restored. I'm still quite certain, though, that the article in question just can't meet the notability criteria, and that it is certain to be deleted at Articles for Deletion. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand. Should I block you...:-) Rettetast 21:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, I'd rather you block the guy with the Benny Hinn fetish. But since I have compulsive editing issues, maybe you ought to block me. It might be the only way I get off the computer and clean out the catbox. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry but it's not allowed. There is a policy for everything. You could try this or just enjoy editing. Have fun either way. :-) --Rettetast 21:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Cats don't really mind wallowing in their own filth, you know. They just pretend they do. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I am not sure if this is how I respond to you but I figured it was. I don't take it personally at all, actually, to the contrary I appreciate it. As I said in my arguement for deletion I wanted this deleted as soon as I found out about it, the last thing I want to be known as is some of the things these things not me as. I tried removing all the info about me as soon as this went up about a year and a half ago and someone restored it. I am nobody terrificly noteworthy, I let that boat sail a long time ago so I could take up lost causes before fading into the palpably obscure and I like it that way.
At any rate, keep up the good work, it looks like you are doing a great job and I am sure many people appreciate it.
Thanks; sorry you slipped between the cracks when this article was created. I doubt it'll happen again, now that you're out of the public eye; if you do have other questions or issues, though, feel free to give me a shout. Those people voting 'merge' are suggesting that all your name needs is an acknowledgement that you were one of the candidates in those provincial elections, without the detail that the article has. -FisherQueen (Talk) 02:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Article X! - it's very helpful when people point out Non-notable articles to us :-) . Keep up the good work on new page patrol. --Fredrick day 22:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
oh and I've just stole the toolkit off your frontpage - let me know if that's a problem. --Fredrick day 23:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
what is your problem with me editing articles? i agree the first ones were way out of line but i think the other 2 weren'tDog jumper idiot100 03:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
You appear to be editing to promote a very strong point of view, to persuade readers that human use of animals is wrong, rather than to use a neutral tone. You edit only articles about the issue that you are passionate about, and all your edits add information to promote your point of view. If you are here to improve the encyclopedia, maybe you should try editing articles about plants, or video games, or Bulgarian politicians, or something that you don't have such a strong bias about. If you're only here to enlighten the world about the evil of riding horses, then you're in the wrong place, because that's just not what Wikipedia is for. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
riding horses is not evil and i am merely fixing uncited biasedness like saying bucking horses ENJOY GOOD food,get regular vet attention and GET TO work 10 seconds a day. thats kinda biased and i added the other point of view to balance it out but got carried away and no im not only editing the articles im passionate about i did edit an article about horse blankets and i am working on animal training right now. Dog jumper100 17:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
FYI, the bucking horses stuff is in fact verifiable, as modern "rough stock" in the US and Canada are well fed (they wouldn't buck worth a darn if they were starving), they do get vaccinations and other vet care (or they wouldn't legally be allowed across state lines), and they do in fact work 10 seconds a day (because that's how long the rodeo cowboy has to stay on), but given that I haven't the time to deal with it, I just let it stay out, particularly if it avoids an edit war. Montanabw 00:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
"English-Canadian" is short-hand for the preferred "English-speaking Canadian". Language politics are huge in Canada, especially in areas where English- and French-speaking Canadians cohabit. As a Canadian of Irish and Scoittish descent, I've never liked the label "English Canadian". Regards, and Happy Pride, Ground Zero | t 16:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I probably could have figured that out using my logic... but I was emphasizing my ignorance of Canadian politics in response to the article creator's apparent belief that the only reason people might have to support deletion was that they were biased against him for reasons of Canadian politics. I've seen Americans assume that the whole Internet is American before, but I don't think I've ever seen a Canadian assume that all of Wikipedia is Canadian. Thanks nonetheless, and happy Pride to you as well. -FisherQueen (Talk) 16:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi sorry about that i think the page was vandalised we are putting up radio and album stats as soon as possible. Thx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shami112233 (talk • contribs)
Maybe you didn't realize that the edit history records all changes made; it shows that the page was not vandalized- the one who removed the speedy deletion tag from The New Pandemic (band) was you. While you're adding stats, you should probably add some information about how this band meets the notability criteria, because the article doesn't make that at all clear. A few reliable sources would be helpful as well. -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your most recent edit summary: It seems a bit much to preemptively accuse anyone who disagrees with your content opinion of being a vandal. Assume good faith and all that. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Please note this is the third time I have moved or deleted the statement in an inappropriate place - Uber keeps reverting it. It is not a generalised bad faith attack on nobody in particular.--Manboobies 11:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm also under the impression if an edit is not vandalism, one is supposed to edit upon it, rather than revert it, if one dislikes it, as Uber must do. Ergo - reversion in this case - vandalism.--Manboobies 11:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the assistance. My major concern was regarding the gross incivility and "screw your rules" attitude (nazis, threats, etc.). Perhaps a gentle notice from administrators would help the user gain respect for civility and policy. Either way, thanks! /Blaxthos 14:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not even an admin. But once you've established consensus, you can warn users for things like 3RR, personal attacks, and spamming, and after the final warning template, most any admin will block for those things. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
So you are not an admin... when are you going to be ready to take the plunge?--Isotope23 15:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I tried in January and wasn't ready yet... I told my admirers, misguided as they may possibly be, that I wouldn't be ready again until June. Of course, I'm still much more of a vandalsmacker than an article-writer, and may not pass in June, either. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Ah yep, I remember now... I was neutral on your RFA due to low activity. You should have no problem this time though if you apply in the next few months. Your edit counts are way up.--Isotope23 15:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Rocklibrary.com is a good source for music information. I linked Melissa Etheridge, Gavin DeGraw and Eric Clapton because there is a lot of good content at rocklibrawry.com that people would be interested in. ME and GD did national contests with the Rock & Roll Library and visited schools with them to promote education through their music. That is relevant and should not have been deleted from either artist's wiki entry. The lesson plans based on those artist's songs are also at rocklibrary.com for free download which I think fans would be interested in seeing so I linked to it. Lack of Rock & Roll Library info in the wiki motivated me to start contributing but if you're just going to delete it I don't see the point of the wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamplayer007 (talk • contribs)
As I said on your talk page, Wikipedia's spam guideline just doesn't permit anyone to come here just to promote their own web site, no matter how good that web site is. If it's really so good, suggest it on the article talk page, and then you won't be in violation of the guideline that tells us not to ever link to a site that we are affiliated with. That helps keep Wikipedia unbiased, which is part of the point of the wiki. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Ok, I thought that I was on the Talk page doing that. Can you provide a link, as I said I'm new to this. Also will you be restoring the factual content that was deleted from the Melissa Etheridge and Gavin DeGraw bios? --Teamplayer007 21:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
No, I wasn't planning on restoring anything to those bios- it was all about the Rock and Roll Library, and as I mentioned, coming to Wikipedia to promote your own web site is strongly discouraged. You could show how much you want to improve Wikipedia's coverage of rock and roll by adding more than just content about your own site to the encyclopedia. For example, Mudcrutch could really use a complete rewrite. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not from the Rock & Roll Library, I just know about it and think it's a really cool source. How would it be different if all I did was add info about Gavin DeGraw, would you think that I'm him and delete that too? I don't know anything about mudcrutch so it doesn't make any sense for me to write about them! Is that how wiki works, you tell volunteers what to add even if they have no knowledge? Thanks anyway. Interesting article on wikipedia in wikipedia, are you who they're talking about under Criticism and controversy? oh, and thanks for the link to the talk page. I feel as though you are being hostile without cause and I have better things to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teamplayer007 (talk • contribs)
Oh, you're under no obligation to take my writing suggestions. If I sound at all hostile, it's only because you aren't the first person, or the hundredth, to come here just to promote a web site, and not very many of them are interested in staying to help build the encyclopedia. If you are, then you're entirely welcome, and I'm glad to give advice to you on anything except how to better promote the Rock and Roll Library. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
![[1]](http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/ticket/archives/doughnuts.jpg){kind=link}