User talk:Keizers

File source problem with File:Atlanta fire station 19 2010.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Atlanta fire station 19 2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Brookhaven

There is nothing political about it. I created a section devoted to the Brookhaven name and areas it can be applied to. The info you had on there didn't belong in the first paragraph.--Mmann1988 (talk) 02:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I see what you are saying. I edited it to get rid of the past tense. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Seems like we have similar editing interests and our paths keep crossing. Cheers! --Mmann1988 (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Cobb County Template/East Cobb

Hey there. Please join the discussion on the template's talk page of why East Cobb should be included. One editor (Nyttend) who is not even from Atlanta or familiar with it won't let East Cobb on there because he says it doesnt exist (?). Wikipedia is not a dictatorship, and thus he doesnt get the final say. Thanks for your help! East Cobb deserves to be on the template, and I think many of its citizens would agree.--Mmann1988 (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Murder kroger facebook page.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Murder kroger facebook page.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Whittier Mills

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Whittier Mills, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.atlantaga.gov/government/urbandesign_whittiermill.aspx, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Whittier Mills and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Whittier Mills, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Whittier Mills with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Whittier Mills. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Whittier Mills saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Peter E. James (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

atl history

goede dag, dont firget that while details are not encouraged for the main page, they are encoruraged for the subpage: history of atlanta. dank u zeer and happy editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.192.128.158 (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Midtown District, Buckhead District

Greetings, both Midtown and Buckhead and "districts," including several neighborhoods.

Midtown has generally been defined as between Monroe Drive on the East, Howell Mill Road on the West, I-85/I-75 on the North, and the southern Boundary has varied...some say to North Avenue, but the Midtown Alliance defined it all the way to Ralph McGill Blvd so to as include the "SoNo" area. However, here's probably the easiest boundary definition, as defined by the Atlanta Police Department:

http://www.atlantacheckercab.com/images/rates/map-midtown.jpg

This one uses Northside Drive as the West boundary.

Here's a "Buckhead" map, including many neighborhoods:

http://www.jennyandcomp.com/Buckhead-n6242.html

While boundaries may be a quibble, most agree that Buckhead and Midtown, like "Downtown," are more than just neighborhoods.Ryoung122 00:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Here is a "six-neigborhood" scheme:

http://www.hiwassee.us/midtown/content/map1.shtml

Ryoung122 00:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Greetings,

To update the conversation on my talk page from May 2011 (you left it unsigned), Midtown can be both the original neighborhood and a district. I note that Buckhead is considered a district (for zoning purposes) and is subdivided into smaller neighborhoods such as Brookwood, North Buckhead, etc. While none of this is ever going to be 100% satisfactory/agreeable to everyone, I think the best scheme for Atlanta is to recognize the relatively unique configuration of the "Downtown, Midtown, and Buckhead" business districts and to consider these as larger than "neighborhoods". Indeed, "Downtown" Atlanta can include smaller divisions such as Fairlie-Poplar (although that's called a "district"!).Ryoung122 20:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Unincorporated communities in Metro Atlanta

Consensus has established that only actual populated places, not regions of counties or strips of land along roads, belong on these templates. Not all unincorporated areas are included: only those that are actual self-contained communities, and for this reason we don't include new housing developments. In short, you're right — consensus has established that longstanding settled areas are the only ones generally acceptable. Nyttend (talk) 22:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Consensus has also established that you don't use multiple accounts ("sockpuppets" or "socks") except in a very narrow set of circumstances. Among other things, undeclared socks may not attempt to change established consensus, which is what you're doing here. Any more activity by your PonceyHighland account will result in a block. Nyttend (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

The apparent sock puppetry is because: my username Keizers is taken on another language Wikipedia. I was accidentally still logged in under the username that I (must) use on the other language Wikipedia. It was a simple accident.Keizers (talk) 13:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, you're still in violation of our policies yet again. When you won't listen to consensus that your articles don't belong on these templates, and when you use multiple accounts without acknowledgement, there's no point to arguing. Nyttend (talk) 13:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I told you — actual established populated places, unlike these areas that you insist on adding. Kindly stop beating a dead horse. Nyttend (talk) 14:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

The horse is not dead, the horse is correct categorization according to the consensus on what an unincorporated community is. I have to stand up for the truth and for correct categorization.Keizers (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

FYI on East Cobb

I have taken the East Cobb and Buford Highway issues to the administrator complaint page, and you were mentioned (under the derogatory term "meat puppet").

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

--Mmann1988 (talk) 03:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been mentioned in the discussion.--Mmann1988 (talk) 05:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanne Denotté

The article Sanne Denotté has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 08:58, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Location map Atlanta, Georgia

Template:Location map Atlanta, Georgia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Presidentman talk·contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 19:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Re Buford Highway

Before I protected I looked at the refs in the old version of the article diff and saw only three references. One of them did not seem to me to be a reliable source - see here. One only mentioned street addresses on Buford Highway - see here. Only one seemed valid and WP:NN calls for multiple reliable independent (third-party) sources, so I protected the current version for 2 weeks to give some time to try and sort things out. I took a brief look at the sources you posted on my talk page and it may be that this does meet notability requirements. I do note that the USGS GNIS does not list any populated places under Buford Corridor or Buford Highway or Buford anything in DeKalb County, which is the first place I check. Would it be possible to work on the article in a sandbox and then take a look at it? That way it could be a work in progress, but not subject to the immediate notability requirements of being in article space. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Lindridge-Martin Manor

I didnt realize you had moved it earlier. However, maps refer to it with a slash. So does the neighborhood sign. Morningside-Lenox Park uses a slash. If you feel strongly, you can move it back. I tire of having everything I do (and I do A LOT in the Atlanta portal) second-guessed.--Mmann1988 (talk) 19:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

History of Georgia Tech

Thanks for adding that paragraph to History of Georgia Tech. It's been on my todo list for that article for a while, but I'd never gotten around to it. ^_^ —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 01:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

No worries I had to to allow me to write about the defunct Hemphill Avenue neighborhood - I like to document all the forgotten places in AtlantaKeizers (talk) 01:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Lenox Park (DeKalb County, Georgia), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Brookhaven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Bowery song

Nice link. Where did you get it? I was thinking there might be other links for NY articles. ScottyBerg (talk) 00:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Peters Park (Atlanta), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Kimball House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Austin Mahone (singer)

Now created with proper sourcing. Cheers.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Race and Atlanta

Excuse me, but I am getting very tired of having to include other racial groups on the Atlanta page that you keep trying to exclude. It is very disconcerting to me that you feel that opinions such as Atlanta being a "black mecca" (a title shared by DC and NYC) should take priority over other opinions. Please, please, PLEASE go to your local library and read the Atlanta entry on the World Book Encyclopaedia. This is what the article is striving for, yet your edits always take it the opposite direction.--Mmann1988 (talk) 17:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what you're referring to. I didn't remove information about other ethnic groups, I only added information about Atlanta being a black mecca and that this is a primary defining characteristic of the city. Certainly as important as the growth of the city's Hispanic and Asian populations and as important as the nickname "city in a forest". I documented this importance as well. In my opinion you don't like the addition of any material having to do with African Americans.Keizers (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

How dare you label me a "anti-black." You're the racist. You want the article to be about black Atlantans to the point that the article is about black Atlantans, not Atlanta. Tonight I will be getting administrators involved so the page can be locked and your agenda can be halted.--Mmann1988 (talk) 18:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

3RR warning on Atlanta

Your recent editing history at Atlanta shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited John Robert Dillon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GSU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Slander/Libel

I don't appreciate you sladering me on other user's talk pages. Just because you hate Hispanic people and think black people are superior to them does not give you ANY right to put me down like that. I hope you know you have lost an ally.--Mmann1988 (talk) 00:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Accusations of sockpuppetry

If you believe RodewayInn (talk · contribs) is a sock puppet, file the proper report at WP:SPI, but do not continue to throw around that accusation in unrelated forums, such as article or user talk pages. Doing so would be considered a violation of civility and might well get you blocked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Atlanta metropolitan area, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hispanic Americans, Dillards and Las Vegas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Culture of Atlanta

Hello. I really don't think it's the right move to create all those subpages for Atlanta culture when they all could fall under Culture of Atlanta. That seems to be the consensus with other city pages. However, they can co-exist if each sub-page is properly expanded.--ATLcolts99 (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

3RR warning on Culture of Atlanta

Your recent editing history at Culture of Atlanta shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --ATLcolts99 (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC)