User talk:美好的时光好孩子

Welcome!

Hello, 美好的时光好孩子! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 08:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Organ (biology) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Organ (biology) was changed by 美好的时光好孩子 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929328 on 2021-12-28T18:40:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Õŕªņģę" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Õŕªņģę and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#Õŕªņģę until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 15:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Qűė" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Qűė and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#Qűė until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 15:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"قمر" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect قمر and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#قمر until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 15:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the spelling of Quran

I agree there are other spelling, but as this is the one used in our article on it, it should be used elsewhere as well. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"حفظ" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect حفظ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#حفظ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 08:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read the guidelines for redirects.

WP:REDIRECT says " redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created.". Please also read the discussions about your redirects above to see what other editors have said. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Human have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Human was changed by 美好的时光好孩子 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96996 on 2022-01-24T22:37:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Girth Summit _(blether) 22:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make similar edits to Human you will be blocked from the article

at least. Doug Weller talk 13:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why? 美好的时光好孩子 (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because we are a mainstream encyclopedia and accept that humans are just another type of mammal/animal. Your edits are disruptive. Doug Weller talk 15:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you try to say that this website is an non-theist encyclopaedia which doesn't take religions seriously and therefore is not neutral? If what you try to say is this, then you have to let everyone know it. So nobody will come and try to make pages neutral. I just tried to show how I feel when article promotes the claim that "humans are animals"; it feels biased to me. If you neglect the possibility of religion to be truth, you also have to accept that you're biased towards non-theism. 美好的时光好孩子 (talk) 15:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove the infobox Kamen Rider Falcon (talk) 16:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I mean that Wikipedia is neutral towards all religions. This means we don't pick one and say it's true. It is also a mainstream encyclopedia that accepts evolutionary theory. And of course most Christian denominations accept evolution. You seem to be biased against them. Doug Weller talk 16:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Human) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of دونالد ابن دونالد الترامب

A tag has been placed on دونالد ابن دونالد الترامب requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

R3 - if we had a WP:RFFL it should be "دونالد الترامب", not expanded out, right?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Happy editing--IAm Chaos 21:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheikh Zubayr

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Sheikh Zubayr, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~Styyx^Talk? 17:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]