User talk:23prootie/Archive Collection
Cookie![edit]
I've never been given a cookie before! Thank you! :-D -- Alternativity (talk) 10:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Alternativity (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Award of The Barnstar of High Culture[edit]
|
The Barnstar of High Culture | |
|
The Barnstar of High Culture is awarded for excellence and diligence in editing List of Religions. Awarded by Addhoc |
DYK[edit]
|
On December 13, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aklanon, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks very much 23prootie for creating this interesting article which was nominated kindly by GeeJo. Feel free to self-nom in future, like the majority of entries. Keep up the great work on the people of Phillipines Philippines! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Smile[edit]
Guest818 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Pinay06|talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Hi! Is it possible for you to help me with the infobox for Eskayan? Thanks. Please let me know your response, positive or otherwise, in my talk page. --Pinay06|talk 20:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Season's greetings[edit]
Merry Christmas!!! The real meaning of Christmas is thisand this...--Pinay06 (Talk•Email) 04:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the wiki smile[edit]
Pinay (talk•email) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hey...Can you help me with the infobox for Eskayan? Salamat... --Pinay (talk•email) 20:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome! :)23prootie 23:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
DYK for Didith Reyes[edit]
|
On 18 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Didith Reyes, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Marky Cielo[edit]
|
|
On 20 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marky Cielo, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Ploning[edit]
|
|
On 31 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ploning, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
DYK for Iron Palace of Luanda[edit]
|
|
On January 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iron Palace of Luanda, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Agila 2[edit]
|
|
On February 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agila 2, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Republic of Biak-na-Bato[edit]
|
|
On February 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Republic of Biak-na-Bato, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 14:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009[edit]
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I've specified in this post [[1]], and this [[2]] that all UN members at that time should be included (such as Egypt, Belarus, Ukraine, and as a USSR-successor Russia) in that list. I've also added a comment in the talk page waiting for someone to reply but to no avail. Most would either revert immediately (with the reason as no source) or wait until I get blocked before they comment. I think its sick that some people are using the block to push their POV and to be fair I think User:Nick-D and User:Jacurek should also be blocked both of whom seem to be ganging-up on me. Also I don't get the reasoning why Newfoundland should be there since it is not independent as their reasoning states. This list [[3]] should have bearing in what should be placed there. FYI Read this before you revert Allies_of_World_War_II#Charter_of_the_United_Nations cause I can see Ukraine and Belarus there. And for the inclusion of British Malaya, British Burma, and French Indochina, well Netherlands East Indies is listed there so why not they?
Decline reason:
I've reviewed the block, and found that the block was well merited and solid. If anything, because this occurred almost immediately after returning from a similar block, and because of the the extreme incivility in the edit summaries, you are probably fortunate only to get a week. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How about a new proposal, if you lessen the punishment for two-three days, I promise to avoid that article for a month (maybe longer) and if I don't then you could block me for a month. If you look at my edit summaries, most of them are okay, it's only that article that really makes my head spin.
Decline reason:
Given your past history of being blocked for the same behavior, I'm not convinced. Blueboy96 21:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have extended this block to a week from now, due to the block evasion/sockpuppetry with User_talk:Lemen drop and User talk:203.76.211.184. Kevin (talk) 02:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is not a request to unblock. I'm just asking how a week could be a lenient punishment. It seems to be a long time to me.
Decline reason:
If you're not asking to be unblocked, don't use this template. If you didn't want your block to be extended, you shouldn't have been evading it. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To answer your question, generally using sockpuppets and/or logged out editing to avoid a block warrants indef blocks for the sockpuppets, and at least resetting the length of the original block. Had I blocked this account for a month for the sockpuppetry, I doubt any eyebrows would have been raised. Count yourself lucky. Kevin (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation[edit]
|
|
On 7 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 10:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Philippine (Three Stars and a Sun Commemorative) Barnstar[edit]
|
Three Stars and a Sun Commemorative Barnstar | |
| 23prootie, I award you this Philippine Barnstar commemorating the passing of Francis Magalona. It is given in recognition of your tireless efforts to improve the Francis Magalona article, and protect it from vandalism, honoring the memory of "the man from Manila." --Alternativity (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Bless the man if his heart and his land are one...Three stars and a sun! -- Francis Magalona (1964 - 2009) |
- gee thanks, even though I only add a sentence, anyway I'm happy.--23prootie (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- well, I thought it contributed to the development of the article,and I wanted to honor that. :-D You're welcome. -- Alternativity (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
May 2009[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Philippines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ryan Delaney talk 03:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
I don't care if he's Adolf Hitler. Edit warring is absolutely unacceptable. If you want to pursue other avenues in dispute resolution you are welcome to do so, but revert warring will not be tolerated as an editing technique in a content dispute. --Ryan Delaney talk 03:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
No, it will not be protected because you can't stop reverting. This is a content dispute and page protection will not be a means to establish someone's preferred version. It's always preferable to block disruptive editors rather than protect an article. --Ryan Delaney talk 03:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ryan Delaney talk 04:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)ITN for July 2009 Mindanao bombings[edit]
|
On 8 July, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article July 2009 Mindanao bombings, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 17:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Please unblock me.[edit]
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel that I have been blocked unfairly because the discussion here has not been adequately resolved. I feel that there should have been a resolution first before blocking me. I only got blocked because of under the table discussions here, and patronage politics may have been involved. Given that the administrator that blocked me is Australian and the topic is partly Australian, I feel that there may have been an abuse of power and conflict of interest in this incident.
Decline reason:
You edit warred, you were blocked, that's what happens. Closedmouth (talk) 13:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Conditional unblock. Could you please unblock me now until August 5 then reinstate the block afterwards moving the deadline from August 8 to August 12 based on the time allotted for this unblock. I would rather wait for the unblock to end unfortunately someone very important died yesterday and I wish to at least improve that dilapidated article. I know that this may be too much given how much trouble I was in the past so I promise that I won't make a ruckus. Again I apologize for the mess I made in the past and I wish you may consider. Thanks.
Decline reason:
The article will be here when you get back. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to convince an administrator that, if unblocked, you would not continue the same behavior that got you blocked in the first place. Jayron32 03:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a continuation of the request above. Honestly the article that I am referring to won't be back when I get unblock so this is kinda urgent. Fine, I promise that I would not do any more disruptive edits is Word War II related articles. There, I said it. So please unblock me.
Decline reason:
You've been blocked 8 times for edit warring and disruption. I see no evidence that such behavior will cease. Toddst1 (talk) 13:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm gonna make this simple. If I continue to edit war at the World War II articles, you can ban me. There, so please unblock me.
Decline reason:
Request declined per previous two admins. If you continue to edit war you'll end up being blocked again anyway. Exploding Boy (talk) 06:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Re-appeal[edit]
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel that the blocking is un-warranted and I believe that it is inappropriate for another Australian administrator to justify it. Unless an outside party (non-Australian administrator, preferably Western) intervenes and clarifies the situation, that is the only time I would accept it. To me this is clearly biased with the admins siding with one side of the debate. I was blocked on the basis of patriotism. Well the same can be said on User:YellowMonkey or any other Australian, American, British involved. They should have not been involved and waited for an outside party. Patronage politics!!!
Decline reason:
What happens with the unblock process is essentially a form of "you pays yer money, you takes yer chance": you don't get to handpick who reviews your block. The other thing that happens is, reviewing admins look for some evidence in your unblock request that you have read and applied the advice in our guide to appealing blocks and have posted a valid unblock request. What the current unblock request boils down to is "My previous request wasn't approved because the reviewing admin is Australian"; this isn't a valid unblock reason, so I suggest you review WP:GAB carefully and try one last time. Exploding Boy (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Again[edit]
23prootie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all I feel that my arguments in the debate in Talk:Pacific War has some validity due to this link. I also feel that I was treated unfairly since I was not given enough time to debate my side since my opponents in the debate would block me first without debating with me. It was only lucky that I did not get blocked immediately that's why I was able to say my side. The 5 against one ratio clearly places me at a disadvantage which is why I find it difficult to present my arguments. Lastly, I think the amount of time I have been blocked is sufficient punishment.
Decline reason:
But you were still edit warring against consensus, and appear unable or unwilling to concede this. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DYK for Visayan Spotted Deer[edit]
|
|
On August 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Visayan Spotted Deer, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Ninoy Aquino Day[edit]
|
|
On August 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ninoy Aquino Day, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 11:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Benham Plateau[edit]
|
|
On September 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Benham Plateau, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 08:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 12:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Cookie[edit]
The Second Coming of The Cookie Monster has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!