Jump to content

User talk:24.240.133.70

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Freedom of the press. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Engineering, you will be blocked from editing. Dr.K.praxislogos 16:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Cyrus McCormick has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. MaenK.A.Talk 15:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Cyrus McCormick. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. MaenK.A.Talk 15:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Human back, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Human back was changed by 24.240.133.70 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-04-08T14:25:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page 78violet. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --RrburkeekrubrR 14:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Amber was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 20:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 78violet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Chemical engineering has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Neisseria meningitidis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Neisseria meningitidis was changed by 24.240.133.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966369 on 2011-03-09T16:14:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Vibhijain. I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Super Bowl with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive, and I’ve reverted it. In the future, please use the sandbox for testing and be sure to provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Please feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Molecular biology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Wagino 20100516 (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)--[reply]

Molecular Biology[edit]

Your edit of Molecular Biology was vandalism. Consider this another warning. Carstensen (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joseph André, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joseph André was changed by 24.240.133.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956279 on 2012-01-05T17:19:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph André with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rm1271 talk to me 17:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph André with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Rm1271 talk to me 17:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Joseph André. Rm1271 talk to me 17:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Antimony, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Antimony was changed by 24.240.133.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96705 on 2012-01-17T15:34:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Andrewman327. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Origin of birds because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Andrew327 15:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Origin of birds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Origin of birds was changed by 24.240.133.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860151 on 2013-02-20T15:11:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Human rights in Mali, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Human rights in Mali was changed by 24.240.133.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.934866 on 2013-02-20T15:12:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Reptile. Arctic Kangaroo 15:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Streptococcus mutans has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Cybernetics has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cybernetics, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. |Cybernetics}} jcc (tea and biscuits) 14:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Legoktm (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Amber concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Amber, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Amber[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samuel Amber, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Monge de Montaudon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Chicago has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sesame Street with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. {C  A S U K I T E  T} 13:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Asukite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hans Memling, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. {C  A S U K I T E  T} 13:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hans Memling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Flyer22 (talk) 13:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mormons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 20:27, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.240.133.70&oldid=1149833496"