User talk:A person in Georgia/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Revert on The Man
There is a somewhat droll reason for me not noticing the whole article has already been tagged but it's definitely no excuse. Thanks for the revert. -The Gnome (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:DNA (upcoming film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DNA (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Amazing World of Gumball: The Movie!
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Amazing World of Gumball: The Movie!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Retirement Plan
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Retirement Plan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Way Out (upcoming film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Way Out (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Woods (upcoming film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Woods (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Svalta
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Svalta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Breakwater (film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Breakwater (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User talk:Unbh, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Unbh: I left a message on your talk page and you reverted it and then messaged me? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- You reverted me without bothering to give an explanation in the edit summary and then left a template message on my talk. Doesn't seem very constructive... Unbh (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Don't blank a section next time? Box office projections vs. results are an important part of a film's performance. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- See, it's not so hard is it. Unbh (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- ? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- See, it's not so hard is it. Unbh (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Don't blank a section next time? Box office projections vs. results are an important part of a film's performance. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- You reverted me without bothering to give an explanation in the edit summary and then left a template message on my talk. Doesn't seem very constructive... Unbh (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Blink (2022 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lacks notability for a standalone article based on a short film that premiered on Youtube. When doing a simple Google search ([1]), only one reliable source mentions the film. As such, it lacks notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 18:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Mixed reviews
You edited an article to say the reviews were "mixed-to-positive"[2] Your edits seem to care about standards and quality and are a prolific editor so I found it surprising that it was you who did it (not some random anonymous editor). Please, see the past discussions if you have not already: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_48#Mixed_to_positive_%2F_Mixed_to_negative
I believe we should try to be clear and direct when writing for an encyclopedia (there may already be a policy somewhere saying this too, but I don't know all the rules from memory) and I think it is better to avoid vague unnecessary equivocation so I recommend picking only one of from those two, either mixed or positive, not both. I generally go with whatever Metacritic says, but you can just as easily go with Rotten Tomatoes and argue that the extra WP:WEIGHT of reviews is enough to say reviews were generally positive. Either way, please don't try to have both at the same time, just pick one. -- 109.79.177.125 (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Blink (2022 film) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blink (2022 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I realized this morning I meant to PROD the article instead, so please disregard my last edits.
Callmemirela 🍁 talk 15:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Contundent Message
WTF is wrong with you? Ignorant predator (talk) 22:11, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Ignorant predator: What kind of message is that? Please read WP:CIVIL! Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
User: Braxton Burrell
I don't think they're here to contribute to Wikipedia. They came back to dump more casting fanfiction on the Mario film, which they're still calling DLC--CreecregofLife (talk) 21:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hate to See You Go (film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hate to See You Go (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Better Call Saul
Season 6 is not a two-part season. I understand that the episodes have a short break mid-season, but that is common with almost all network television series - it does not make it a split season. Every Walking Dead season would be considered a two part season if that were the case. The season was all filmed in one go, and there is nothing in the contracts of the cast to indicate it is a split season. Jericho735 (talk) 21:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jericho735: Reliable sources have already confirmed that it is two parts. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: Do you not see the difference between this show's final season and the final seasons of Breaking Bad, Mad Men, or The Sopranos? The network chose to air episode 8 a month and a half after episode 7, but the season was not produced in two parts (nor was it announced that it will be released on home media in two parts). It's mid-season break is shorter than the mid-season break of every Walking Dead season; it's shorter than the midseason break nearly all network shows routinely have during their seasons (like Jericho, for example). Jericho735 (talk)
- @Jericho735: It doesn't matter. Two parts, two awards seasons is what AMC has confirmed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: You might not think it matters - but it does. Why is the final season of The Walking Dead, which has two mid-season breaks (and is eligible for multiple award seasons), not a "3-part" season? There is a difference between having a mid-season break, and being a two-parter like Breaking Bads final season. It is not the same. Jericho735 (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jericho735: You might want to discuss this with others so you don't get the same response. AMC made it clear that this is a two-parter. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: You might not think it matters - but it does. Why is the final season of The Walking Dead, which has two mid-season breaks (and is eligible for multiple award seasons), not a "3-part" season? There is a difference between having a mid-season break, and being a two-parter like Breaking Bads final season. It is not the same. Jericho735 (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jericho735: It doesn't matter. Two parts, two awards seasons is what AMC has confirmed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: Do you not see the difference between this show's final season and the final seasons of Breaking Bad, Mad Men, or The Sopranos? The network chose to air episode 8 a month and a half after episode 7, but the season was not produced in two parts (nor was it announced that it will be released on home media in two parts). It's mid-season break is shorter than the mid-season break of every Walking Dead season; it's shorter than the midseason break nearly all network shows routinely have during their seasons (like Jericho, for example). Jericho735 (talk)
Concern regarding Draft:Jim Jones (film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jim Jones (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Blitz (upcoming film)
Hello, Some Dude From North Carolina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blitz (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Some Dude,
Wouldn't you agree that the draft article mentioned above now passes WP:NFF and should be moved to article mainspace? The Film Creator (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think so but I would wait a few months. Most sources are just casting announcements and filming began last month so we won't hear about its release until late 2022 or 2023. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Why did you undo edits?
Hi - I do not know how else to contact you. You have just undone an edit I did on a television series despite the edit being appropriately cited - there is nothing untrue in what has been added, and it all has a citation. I am merely clarifying the development history of the show. What is the specific concern with the relatively minor edits and with actually clarifying the background of the show? The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- The Manual of Style on Wikipedia is generally against additions to the article that sound like advertisements. Here's your edit:
- Before: "The Lincoln Lawyer is an upcoming American legal drama streaming television series created and executive produced by David E. Kelley, based on the 2008 novel The Brass Verdict by Michael Connelly."
- After: "The Lincoln Lawyer is an upcoming American legal drama streaming television series created for television by David E. Kelley and developed by Ted Humphrey, based on the series of bestselling novels by Michael Connelly. The initial season is based on Connelly's 2008 novel The Brass Verdict."
- "Based on the series of bestselling novels" is what I had to revert. Your addition of two sources was also unnecessary since the information was already cited elsewhere, so I reverted that too. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, happy to lose the word "bestselling." There are two key pieces of information here which are not cited elsewhere, however. One is that the series is based on the entire series of novels. As the Deadline article indicates, only the "freshman season" (the words used in the Deadline article) is based on THE BRASS VERDICT. Yes, it is true that as of now there is only that one season, but as that article and numerous others indicate, the series is meant to be based on the entire series of novels. The other piece of information is that in addition to being created by David E. Kelley, the series was developed by Ted Humphrey. That again is cited in the Deadline article and in other articles. The "developed by" credit is the functional equivalent of the "created by" credit - just different verbiage. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- The article clearly states that the series is "based on the 2008 novel The Brass Verdict by Michael Connelly." We can't say "initial season" until Netflix confirms the show's renewal since that would violate a guideline known as WP:CRYSTALBALL. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- I understand that one early article states this. More recent articles clearly state that the series is based on the entire season of books, and the initial season only is based on THE BRASS VERDICT. This feels like semantics. It is not a violation of WP:CrystalBall to say that the initial season will be based on The Brass Verdict and any subsequent seasons will be based on other books in the series. Here are a few recent articles which all use this language - if these had been published initially you would presumably have cited it this way.
- https://deadline.com/2022/04/the-lincoln-lawyer-netflix-premiere-date-photos-1234995324/
- https://www.tvinsider.com/gallery/the-lincoln-lawyer-manuel-garcia-rulfo-premiere-date-photos-netflix/ The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Though Deadline says that only "Season 1 is based on the second book The Brass Verdict," we can't say that because Netflix hasn't confirmed that there will be season 2. If there's no season 2, then we'd be lying to the reader by saying "initial season". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- And the "Developed by" credit? Which is a WGA credit, used for one something is created based on pre-existing material (such as a series of books). The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that can be added back. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, would you like me to do that or will you do that? I am happy to do it if you like. Thanks. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi just slightly clarified the development path with one last edit - thank you. Let me know if there is an issue with it. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 02:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that can be added back. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- And the "Developed by" credit? Which is a WGA credit, used for one something is created based on pre-existing material (such as a series of books). The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Though Deadline says that only "Season 1 is based on the second book The Brass Verdict," we can't say that because Netflix hasn't confirmed that there will be season 2. If there's no season 2, then we'd be lying to the reader by saying "initial season". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- The article clearly states that the series is "based on the 2008 novel The Brass Verdict by Michael Connelly." We can't say "initial season" until Netflix confirms the show's renewal since that would violate a guideline known as WP:CRYSTALBALL. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, happy to lose the word "bestselling." There are two key pieces of information here which are not cited elsewhere, however. One is that the series is based on the entire series of novels. As the Deadline article indicates, only the "freshman season" (the words used in the Deadline article) is based on THE BRASS VERDICT. Yes, it is true that as of now there is only that one season, but as that article and numerous others indicate, the series is meant to be based on the entire series of novels. The other piece of information is that in addition to being created by David E. Kelley, the series was developed by Ted Humphrey. That again is cited in the Deadline article and in other articles. The "developed by" credit is the functional equivalent of the "created by" credit - just different verbiage. The Screen Chronicler (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
DYK for The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild
On 16 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that none of the original core Ice Age cast returned for The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject
Hey, I know you work on articles that deal with films and other stuff like that, such as Buck Wild. I was wondering if you would join a new WikiProject for 20th Century Studios. (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/20th Century Studios) Im just seeing if there is enough people that would join the project to get it started. Would be happy to have you join, but I'm not shoving this down your throat to join. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 18:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Change Settings to and Protect the Mario Movie Indefinitely (No Date Selected)
Just so you know, there's some additions of unsourced content to the page. It's still hapening, and I know it is. This is why protecting the page until the film's release date is a bad idea, and someone added the gross (which it hasn't been revealed yet). I hope this works better than protecting it until the film's release, because I know there might be spoilers if they do. Thank you. —2601:204:203:5110:EC0E:5650:F1FB:3878 (talk) 06:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Reverts
Any reason for reverting my edits to the Lincoln lawyer film/TV series pages? Neither makes any reference to the other, which would aid the reader. IPBilly (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- @IPBilly: You don't need the "See Also" section. That's what The Lincoln Lawyer (disambiguation) is for. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Geez!
I can't believe I forgot the title for the Barbie source!--CreecregofLife (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Lol it happens to the best of us. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is why I use the desktop view on mobile. Access to the citation templates (web is my go-to) are crucial CreecregofLife (talk) 00:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wine and Roses
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wine and Roses you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Carrot and Stick
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carrot and Stick you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Quit fucking spamming my talk page
Moron
- @LJF2019: Look who's in a good mood ;) Not trying to spam your talk page, so sorry about that. I'm not even adding the messages. It's the XFD bot from Twinkle, informing you that I have nominated a number of your files to Files For Discussion. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:28, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Either way, you’re shitlisting pictures I spent hours uploading and have stayed there until you decided to try and delete them. No one is being hurt by having the pictures stay there; you can keep saying removing the picture “doesn’t detract from the article’s understanding” but at the end of the day you’re removing a graphic from an episode article on one of the greatest television shows of all time. All it boils down to is removing useful visual information. I don’t care whatever snobby Wikipedia policy you throw at me, try to think like an actual person instead of an internet nerd who doesn’t go outside. LJF2019 talk 01:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry you spent so much time uploading them, but their deletion is not up to me. I'd recommend you move them to the Breaking Bad fandom wiki, where they are acceptable. You're welcome to leave your thoughts at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 1. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wine and Roses
The article Wine and Roses you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wine and Roses for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Breaking Bad Pilot.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Breaking Bad Pilot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wine and Roses
The article Wine and Roses you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Wine and Roses for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Better Call Saul - Marco.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Better Call Saul - Marco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Bottoms (film)
Okay 1. please don't retire! 2. Do you think the source you added is good enough to say Draft:Bottoms (film) is in production and can be moved to mainspace? Kingsif (talk) 19:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kingsif: Film New Orleans has been wrong before. For example, it said Renfield (film) began filming in January when it actually started production in February. I think we should wait for a cast/crew member to give their confirmation. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Asking for review
Hi, sorry to bother you (again!). I wanted to ask you if you have time, can you please review some of my articles? I would really appreciate this and will be very thankful for that; you're such an amazing reviewer and the best. Here are the articles that I have nominated for GA: Ricky Martin, Recuerdo (song), Otra Noche en L.A., Adrenalina (Wisin song), and Canción Bonita. Also, I'm going to nominate Sound Loaded in a few hours. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 12:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- I beg you, please. 🙂 I understand that Ricky Martin article is too long, but I assure you that these articles don't need much work... I won't insist again if you don't want to do this, but I just beg you about that. I'm very grateful for your previous reviews and I would be beyond that if you do this favor and review these articles whenever you had time to do it. 🙏 آرمین هویدایی (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @آرمین هویدایی: I'll do them. I'll open the GAN-pages when I'm ready to review. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, this is a big honor for me. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 12:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @آرمین هویدایی: I'll do them. I'll open the GAN-pages when I'm ready to review. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Full Measure (Breaking Bad).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Full Measure (Breaking Bad).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ambulance (2022 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ambulance (2022 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Carrot and Stick
The article Carrot and Stick you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carrot and Stick for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ambulance (2022 film)
The article Ambulance (2022 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ambulance (2022 film) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 07:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Revert on Old (film)
Not sure why you thought my edits on Old were vandalism. It wasn't. Please indicate why you thought so.--02:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Carrot and Stick
The article Carrot and Stick you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carrot and Stick for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ambulance (2022 film)
The article Ambulance (2022 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ambulance (2022 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 08:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Block
A person in Georgia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My bad. Won't do it again. I'm ready to contribute constructively. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @331dot
Please tell what contributions you want to make.
Um... I'd like to return to editing articles like normal. The block was for moving my talk page so I'll stop with the user page moving. But for contributions, just the normal kind. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
@Fastily, Tamzin, and 331dot: I don't know what I'm missing but from where I am this looks like an incredibly abrupt and premature block. As far as I can tell he was trying to separate the history of his user page and forgot to uncheck "Move associated talk page". Even most vandals get more warnings before they're blocked, and we're talking about a prolific content contributor with a dozen GAs in his portfolio. (Was move-protecting this page not an option?) If there indeed was an egregious transgression deserving an instant block, an explanation would help. I think an explanation from you, SDFNC, of what you were trying to do would help your unblock request too. Nardog (talk) 00:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- I thought that since every comment left on my talk page had been archived that I would be allowed to delete my talk page, kinda like a "refresher" since it has, I think, over 1000 edits in the history. Guess that's not allowed so I'll stop. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's not allowed because if it was then the archived comments would have no public records of them having been actually made, making them vulnerable to tampering. Still far from a blockable offense IMO, though. Where are the "warnings" Fastily refers to in the block rationale? All I can find are Explicit's summaries. No "Here's the reason you can't do that", "What are you trying to achieve by that?", or "Stop it or you'll be blocked." Nardog (talk) 01:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- If you want your talkpage to have a clear history, a legitimate way to do that would be to move and archive it. i.e stop letting the archive bot handle this, wait till this page has become big and then move it to User talk:Some Dude From North Carolina/Archive 6. Many people archive their talkpage this way. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll keep this in mind. Thank you. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on the block itself, but Some Dude From North Carolina was well aware that deleting his user talk page was not appropriate and moving its history to a subpage to get it deleted was gaming the system. I made that clear the first two times I declined his speedy deletion requests. He simply waited two weeks for another attempt in hopes that that it fell in the hands of another administrator. These actions are clearly an abuse of process.
- I should note that I ran into a similar issue with this user on Draft:Black and Blue (Better Call Saul) (see page history) and the followup message indicates that SDFNC either doesn't understand the application of G7 or refuses to abide by policy. ✗plicit 03:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Explicit: perhaps some duration of ban from making G7/U1 requests? Gives SDFNC some time to ruminate on what they did wrong here, without totally cutting off the access of an otherwise-quality contributor. A more narrowly-tailored solution, as a start (since we're already well past a warning, it seems). theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
FYI: I have requested this indef block be reviewed by other admins on AN. Nardog (talk) 21:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Unblocked
After discussing with Fastily, I have unblocked you, on the understanding that you will not again try to get your user talk page deleted. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- I understand. Thank you. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Discussion about Better Call Saul
@Masem: @Some Dude From North Carolina:
First, in general terms, I don't think it's reasonable for you two specifically to act unilaterally to revert all changes made by others - in this case, me. I don't want any quoting of the rules back to me, either. I don't have a problem with Wikipedia requirements like relevance or brevity - I have a problem when one user apparently acts like only he gets to decide what qualifies.
Second, I believe I've been reasonable. For example, in the 200 word plot summaries on the Season 6 page, I think there's nothing wrong with including the flash forwards. One of you does. I think that's wrong, really wrong, but I haven't continued to argue, because I get that this is supposed to be a collaborative site and different people can see things in different ways.
Third, specifically to "Black and Blue" - my view is that the relevant point isn't that "the two part ways". That tells the reader nothing about how the plot advances. What matters for advancing the plot is that Lalo wants to get into the house, but doesn't receive an invitation, even though he's clearly angling for one, so he has to break in the next day. It's the need for entry and the subsequent break in that move the narrative forward, not the "the two parting ways". That's why I think my version is the more accurate one in this case. I'm willing to discuss that point, but as of now I just don't see a "parting" without context as being particularly useful to summarizing the episode.
I'd love to find a way to resolve this without stepping on each other. Thanks in advance for your consideration.
Billmckern (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- Just leave it as it is. They talked. Lalo left. She went to work. He broke into her house and saw the sculpture. That's it. Just keep it short. Might have been better to start the discussion at Talk:Black and Blue (Better Call Saul). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stay
Don't know you, but love your name, please stay, you've obviously done good work and we need good editors like you! Also from NC....Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 09:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- I know this Upcoming Film next year called 65 has something to do with DINOSAURS because I saw this. https://paleo-media.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_Paleo-media#Upcoming I think it’s best what this “He’s not alone on the mysterious Planet” is known to be populated with. Especially tell this “Some Dude From North Carolina” that that’s what this upcoming film has Terrible Lizards. Dylan Geltzeiler 21:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylan Geltzeiler (talk • contribs)
- ? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Lincoln Lawyer
It's relevant because it answers a reader's natural question, "Why does the TV show have a different name than the book?" But perhaps the flow is bad. I don't have time to revisit it today, but I may another time. Dan Bloch (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- It might be best to cite a source. I get your point but I don't see the need to reference both the book and the movie The Lincoln Lawyer. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Move to Georgia
Hi, I'm sorry to see you've... moved to Georgia, and I see it may have something to do with a strange unjustified block. I appreciate your contributions and we need people like you on TV/film articles. Please reach out to me if there is anything I can help with. — Bilorv (talk) 07:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: thanks. will do. so long. A person in Georgia (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
Superstore (season 6) has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. U-Mos (talk) 07:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Recent edit at Dominion
Regarding this edit, just wanted to let you know that I think "has received" is more appropriate here, since the action is still happening. Reviews are still coming in. Per the explanation given at this link, Present Perfect tense is necessary to describe an action that began in the past but continues into the present. Hope that helps. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
My Mother's Wedding moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, My Mother's Wedding, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 23:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fall (2022 film).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fall (2022 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Removing retired tag
To quote from Wikipedia:Retiring: Retirement is just another way of saying that a user has permanently left Wikipedia.
I think the template {{Semi-retired}} is more suitable instead, because you are just reducing your activity, not leaving Wikipedia outright. I hope you have a great time here and will return editing like normal soon. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
File rename
Hello, I declined your request for File:Don't Worry Darling (teaser poster).png to be renamed. This was because you listed WP:FNC#6 for the rationale. You should list at least 1 other related file that the new file will harmonize with, so that the move can be completed. If you have a file, then you can reopen the request or ping me and I can complete it. Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 13:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Terasail That file will most likely be used to update the image when a new, final poster is released, so the word "teaser" will become unnecessary in the near future. Which policy should be used to remove it? A person in Georgia (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- If the file is updated then WP:FNC#3 would probably apply however a file shouldn't really be overwritten with a new file which does not meet the current title. In these cases it is best to uploaded a new file with the correct title instead. At the moment no FNC applies to the file that I can see. Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 14:59, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jeepers Creepers - DVD - Original Trilogy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jeepers Creepers - DVD - Original Trilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
BMA on Puss in Boots The Last Wish
So, BMA reverted my reversion of them reinstalling the date the composer was announced. My edit summary was admittedly blank otherwise, and I’m trying to limit my reversions for a period going forward, so I’m coming to you wondering what the next step should be. Article talk page discussion? User talk discussion? Or go straight to the warnings? CreecregofLife (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- They already ignored some of the warnings I sent them on their talk page, so I'd continue the article talk page discussion and see if we can resolve the issue. A person in Georgia (talk) 12:04, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wine and Roses.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wine and Roses.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For your continuous and impressive efforts to improve the Better Call Saul season 6 episodes, I think you deserve this. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 14:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC) |
Jeepers Creepers: Reborn
The release date is revealed in the official trailer. 2600:1017:B10C:50F7:9434:2B19:4A6A:61D (talk) 22:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- The lawsuit halted the release. A person in Georgia (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Kim's reaction
Hi! I just wanted to talk about the edit we keep going back and forth on, whether Kim's reaction is important in the opening scene. I believe strongly that it is an important inclusion, since it reflects the disparate ways in which Jimmy and Kim are reacting and how they process grief, and is important to understand the text and the actions she proceeds to take. The word count for the summary is 345 at the moment, so that is not an issue. Please let me know why you continually are refusing this inclusion! Wasianpower (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Wasianpower: "does not react". Ok, why is this important to note? Jimmy is telling something to her, and she is listening and thinking without a facial reaction. Is there a reaction to be had? We can't speculate. What's important is Jimmy telling her that they'll forget. So, I don't think it's necessary, since it doesn't exactly show "how they process grief". Her talk to Cheryl and her departue from law do. A person in Georgia (talk) 15:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hm, I just disagree I guess. The current wording implies to me that a) she is listening, and b) she may even accept what Jimmy is saying, when the show itself leaves the first ambiguous and the second is clearly negative. Hence why I think her reaction is important to note. If her reaction was to accept what Jimmy was saying, that would be equally important to note because how how invested this episode's story is in Kim's internal thoughts.
- I agree in general that each character's reaction to every scene is not necessary or an improvement, but for this specific scene I think it's a necessary inclusion. Wasianpower (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- I think you're right. A person in Georgia (talk) 16:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Spider-Man Day
Hey friend I like to wish you a happy Spider-Man Day. Romahytinvmmxc (talk) 00:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
A person in Georgia (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fall (2022 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Fall (2022 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't move this article. A person in Georgia (talk) 22:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
"Munich (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Munich (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Munich (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
"Don't Look Up (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Don't Look Up (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Don't Look Up (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Snowman original poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Snowman original poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Why?
Why did you undo my referenced fact about Saul Gone? 109.173.156.226 (talk) 01:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:My Old Ass
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My Old Ass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
"The Formula (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Formula (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 1#The Formula (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
If (2024 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, If (2024 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 10:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
The Woman King
I see that you reverted this before. FYI, I just reverted this from the same editor. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Nancy Meyers film
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Nancy Meyers film, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rock and Hard Place
The article Rock and Hard Place you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rock and Hard Place for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
"Bel-Air (upcoming TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bel-Air (upcoming TV series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 12#Bel-Air (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rock and Hard Place
The article Rock and Hard Place you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rock and Hard Place for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Wanted to make sure you saw this (since I flubbed the initial ping). Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Best Man Dead Man
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Best Man Dead Man, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Boys of Summer (film)
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boys of Summer (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hello Stranger (upcoming film)
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hello Stranger (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hot Milk (film)
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hot Milk (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Jim Jones (film)
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jim Jones (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Karma Chameleon (film)
Hello, A person in Georgia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karma Chameleon (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)