User talk:Accurizer

This user may have left Wikipedia. Accurizer has not edited Wikipedia since 29 December 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page.
Please post new messages at the bottom of the page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics.
If you are a registered user, I will respond on your talk page, but may link to my reply here so I will remember what we discuss.
If you are not a registered user, I will respond here. Thanks! —Accurizer

Archives: Jan–May 2006, June–July 2006, Aug–Oct 2006, Nov–Dec 2006, Jan–May 2007, June–Dec 2007, Jan–May 2008, June–Dec 2008, 2009–2011

Accurizer is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Accurizer! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Accurizer

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Camden County Police Department

Hello! Your submission of Camden County Police Department at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 14:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Camden County Police Department

On 1 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Camden County Police Department, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the formation of the Camden County Police Department in New Jersey has been criticized as "union-busting"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Camden County Police Department. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Template:Caesars Entertainment

The problem is the casino was effectively folded into another casino. If the name is still used, then it should be in the current list. If the name was retired then it should be were I moved it. In either case, deletion from the template is simply inappropriate. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Bally's Atlantic City

Thanks for your several improvements to Bally's Atlantic City, including the merge of The Wild Wild West Casino into the main article. Worldbook1967 (talk) 07:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

66.87.101.29

IP is a known sock of the blocked TheREALCableGuy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and I do have a request for protection up right now. Feel free to revert and report. Nate • (chatter) 02:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank J. Dodd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neptune, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black Mariah

The article Black Mariah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band, fails WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJay^{What did I do?} 17:11, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Accurizer! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your thoughts?

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Broadhead has been accepted

Sarah Broadhead, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey gubernatorial candidates

Great category in "New Jersey gubernatorial candidates", thanks. Are you going to do the same for the "New Jersey Senate candidates" and "New Jersey mayoral candidates"? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: [1]

Mary Baker Eddy

Hi, I really appreciate your courtesy in consulting me on whether she was a hypochondriac. The latest major biography of her by Gillian Gill, makes it quite clear (page 42) that all three Baker girls suffered from severe illnesses throughout their childhood and young adulthood, which required intervention by physicians.
The accounts that episodes of Mary's "hysteria" reported by Milmine corresponded to these illnesses are also discredited (page 41).
In the interests of accuracy, I would like my edit to stand. Bblandford (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: [2]

Gabriella Ricca

Under Notable People in Hammonton, New Jersey you removed Gabriella Ricca by stating “Gabriella Ricca, does not appear to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Gymnastics, page redirected” I took the honor of the World Champion, as she was recognized by the town of Hammonton, and added her under Events. As she was recognized and notable by the town of Hammonton, she would be considered mentioned under Community. If it’s another category under Community, then please add her to the right one. Her page was removed. Why was this page removed? She is noted from many sources of the media and her page should be recovered since it’s not under Wikipedia:Notability. Please reply. Respectfully thank you. Georgivac (talk)

Reply: [3]

Hi Accurizer, I haven’t had a reply from you so I did notice as you stated Gabriella Ricca does not meet Wikipedia’s WP:NGYMNASTICS, However she does meet Wikipedia’s WP:GNG as some following links with a few multiple articles of in depth coverage to satisfy for her page to be brought back. She is eligible through WP:GNG. The articles mentioned are not press releases. The articles are verifiable as they are published works from the media and other sources that’s required.

There is one article released through many of USA Today’s papers throughout the USA (Nationally) at that time, as they can now be found on their online website under Gymnastics. She was featured in the sports section for it. Her photo’s are provided in the article. There are many more that I don’t need to keep providing. This is probably used as one (1) verifiable article/source.

Link with story pic on UsaToday.com - http://www.usatoday.com/topic/b07264cc-172c-4ddf-acca-50b860a5cc76/gymnastics/ (Scroll down to Hammonton girl adjusts, wins gymnastics title) - Here is the article - http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2014/07/27/hammonton-girl-adjusts-wins-gymnastics-title/13251325/

The Wisconsinrapidstribune.com - (Scroll down to Hammonton girl adjusts, wins gymnastics title as you will find it again) http://www.wisconsinrapidstribune.com/topic/b07264cc-172c-4ddf-acca-50b860a5cc76/gymnastics/

The Courierpostonline.com - goes directly to the page http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/sports/2014/07/27/hammonton-girl-adjusts-wins-gymnastics-title/13251325/

The list goes on throughout the USA for this article. All valid and verifiable as it shows

The following from the pressofatlanticcity.com would be the Second (2nd) verifiable article/source.

The pressofatlanticcity.com features her in their article under Everyone Has a Story: Ex-wrestler dad helped young gymnast grapple with fear http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/blogs/michelle_post/everyone-has-a-story-ex-wrestler-dad-helped-young-gymnast/article_188e0bb2-0afb-11e4-b3dd-0019bb2963f4.html

Some of the above links are already provided on Tony Ricca’s

The Hammonton Gazette Article - A Third (3rd) verifiable article/source. The Hammonton Gazette 07/09/14 Edition - Page 69 - Joomag https://www.joomag.com/...hammonton.../0557493001404911143?... Jul 9, 2014 - arena honored for success Gabriella ricca wins gymnastics titles Wednesday, July 9, 2014 • The Hammonton Gazette • Page 57 by dan ...

The Hammonton News featured her in their paper but it’s not online. A copy can be provided if necessary. This would be another verifiable Article/Source.

There’s an online article on The Pharaoh (Tony Ricca), Gabriella Ricca’s father which mentions her accomplishments in that article. If you need this please ask.

The following link is from a website called america.pink. http://america.pink/gabriella-ricca_1653713.html

The following website is a live scoring system that documents athletic events. Here’s where she can be found for her World Championship Scores. This is very valid as it is a scoring system for athletes and should be considered at least a Fourth (4th) verifiable source. http://www.meetscoresonline.com/2014-FL-USAIGC-IAIGC-World-Championships - Click Meet Results and scroll down to Session: 3 Level: CO Division: 12 yrs Click PDF - She’s also in the Top Scores Bracket.

Please advise as to adding back the page Gabriella Ricca. Two of what I provided is considered multiple sources (that’s debatable if you don’t consider that). So I’ve produced more to show more sources that constitutes a multiple amount of them. She should now meet the requirements through WP:GNG from the above mentioned provided.

I took my time to provide the necessary information that would be needed to show the validation of her through WP:GNG. I look forward to your consideration for the above to place her back on her own page. Please reply with any additional information that may be needed or please point me to talk with a higher editor regarding this. It would be much appreciated. I was told that this was enough to put her back up. Thank you very much Georgivac (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replies: [4] [5]

Hi Accurizer. Just a couple of notes here. Before that here's another multiple source, well established, that's online from the Town of Hammonton giving her recognition for her World Championship win. It is online at the following link http://livestream.com/Hammonton/events/3326659 as it was live on Television then. It can be seen just under seven minutes into the Town of Hammonton Meeting or you can watch the meeting in it's entirety to show the validity of it from the Town of Hammonton. Under community they have Wineries and Alcohol Consumption. There is one article mentioning the wineries listed. The Theatre listed has one article by the Press of Atlantic City (same person that wrote the article for Gabriella Ricca). Gabriella has many, should she have her own under community. She may be one person but she is part of the Community as you look at Popular Culture there is a single person that's mentioned in it. You're quote " There is now more about Gabriella in the Hammonton article than San Mateo, California has about Tom Brady". Your statement and it should hold true for this as well. Stating facts here and there are no substitutes for them as the guidelines are clear about them. Should these be present on it as many other establishments have had articles and are not shared under Community? This would be biased as one person is singled out. The guidelines are clear as she has multiple articles and I understand there is another one featuring her again. Is that not enough? Again, according to WP:GNG, she has multiple sources to identify her as she had her own page. She has another feature as mentioned. I am looking to help Wikipedia maintain its integrity to follow the guidelines properly that's fact based. Gabriella Ricca has multiple sources and your denying her of her own page. She is believed to be in the WP:GNG guidelines by a Wikipedia contributor which validates her sources. As with the wineries that have one source and stay standing, her multiple sources don't count for you. I'm very disappointed but stay respectful as one should. If you can shed some information on what I had mentioned that would be much appreciated. I would kindly ask you to have her own page placed back stating the guidelines. As for the Community, like the wineries, many more that have their own place in the community that have articles about them should be inserted, should they not? Thank you Georgivac (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: [6]

Ricardo Munguía

Actually that is not what Wikipedia is for....if the person is notable, write an article...if he isn't, don't add him to the disambiguition page. Lectonar (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok if I mail it to you? Give me some time, though...I will be back online tomorrow. Cheers.Lectonar (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have mailed it to you; imho, this is typical of a WP:BLP1E. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proper categorization

It is consensus that for a Person to be from Foo has to either been born or lived in Foo. Things that don't qualify someone from being from Foo

- Place of death unless that was their home at the time.
- Where they are buried. Is JFK from Arlington Virginia just because he is buried there?
- Graduates from a school located in Foo.
- Playing for a sports team located in Foo.

None of these qualify a person as being from Foo. Therefore sports team players and people buried in XYZ cemetery categories are not categorized 'People from Foo'. Look at Category:Sportspeople by city in the United States do you see other cities with their sports team categories as subcategories of Sportspeople from Foo?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WilliamJE: Can you point to a discussion that established this consensus? Thanks, Accurizer (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Accurizer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tom Uzhunnalil) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tom Uzhunnalil, Accurizer!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time ...

If you have time help at Mayor of Long Branch, New Jersey‎, there is no canonical list and the librarian in Long Branch has started a list when I asked her if they had a list. However, we keep finding contradictory information. --RAN (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Accurizer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Accurizer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gambling regulators has been nominated for discussion

Category:Gambling regulators, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sportspeople from Brick Township, New Jersey has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sportspeople from Brick Township, New Jersey has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tinton5 (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weirsky

I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 00:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emma E. Booker Elementary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma E. Booker Elementary School, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma E. Booker Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 17:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]