User talk:Adenoghie

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dirkbb (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you forthekingdom 21:03, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Castle Films. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:AA Momodu

I've restored it and moved it to Draft:AA Momodu. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you forthekingdom 21:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AA Momodu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AA Momodu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 10:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stupendous day to you Reading Beans, first of,thank you for the advice and the fact that you moved my article to draft instead of delete it 🙏

I am from Nigeria and I am in Nigeria and I am proud of it.

I don't know where you from or how things works over there but right here in my country things are quite different from Western Nations. That been said, to get an interview with any News Media, whether print, radio, television or internet cost alot of money and only few people can afford that. Now does that mean only the rich are making marks or daring great feats? Certainly No! But how can people like AA Momodu be heard or be applauded without people willing to do all they can to show the world that good can still come out of Nigeria. And Wikipedia was created for such adventures.

I wrote about AA Momodu because I wanted to put out something that I know that is truly inspiring. That not all young Nigerians are involved in internet fraud or whatever name it maybe called.

With the current trends at which people review articles on Wikipedia,the time is coming when only the rich can have an article on Wikipedia from my country.

I believe that for Wikipedia to maintain it's fidelity. Before you review, remove or delete an article you must understand the way and manner things works from the articles country of origin. Otherwise we'll be making decisions like robots and not like humans. Wikipedia policy must be reviewed with respect to the aforementioned statement.

Reading Beans, I have seen many articles with far less citations to mine and no one has brought them down.

Just my thoughts because I am tired having to go through this embarrassing experience more than once.

Thank you adenoghie! forthekingdom 08:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maureen Omorinsola Badejo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maureen Omorinsola Badejo. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It does not appear to be encyclopaedic. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 11:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Beans...

Appreciated, I am still gathering more information with respect to the said article. forthekingdom 12:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maureen Omorinsola Badejo (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing is a little light, and the biography section is entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maureen Omorinsola Badejo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adenoghie! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you forthekingdom 10:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Osemwegie (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephen Osemwegie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Osemwegie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stephen Osemwegie, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adenoghie,

If you move draft articles that have been declined by AFC reviewers into the main space of the project without addressing the reviewer's concerns, you can expect that they might be reviewed and tagged for deletion. If this article is deleted and you want to continue to work on it in Draft space, let me or the deleting administrator know about your request. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the insight. But I had moved it from the mainspace to draft to enable correct some of errors and yet it was deleted from the draft space is that legal? Please I need the article to be moved to draft to enable correct and complete. Adenoghieking 12:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zuma Rock (Human Face): Mystic or Fact? moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zuma Rock (Human Face): Mystic or Fact?. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Imzadi 1979 → 21:06, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is not ready for publication to main space. It reads too much like an essay and not at all like an encyclopedia article. Please work on the draft and allow a neutral reviewer to judge the draft when you feel that it is ready to submit it for approval Imzadi 1979 → 21:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated your reply and your professionalism. I will improve on it(thank) forthekingdom 12:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Zionzina per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zionzina. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 13:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I believe I should be unblocked for the furtherance of free writing everywhere. Thank you!}} Adenoghieking 10:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recent attended Wikipedia training and I was properly educated on the rules and guidelines how to create and manage Wikipedia article also ways to properly managed several accounts properly. So, I believe this is a good reason to be reinstated thank you Adenoghieking 11:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AA Momodu

Hello, Adenoghie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AA Momodu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maureen Omorinsola Badejo

Hello, Adenoghie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maureen Omorinsola Badejo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AA Momodu

Hello, Adenoghie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "AA Momodu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maureen Omorinsola Badejo

Hello, Adenoghie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maureen Omorinsola Badejo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stephen Osemwegie

Hello, Adenoghie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephen Osemwegie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]