User talk:Aero Slicer

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Happy Squirrel (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 13:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Creating redirect[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How to create a redirect directly towards an existing page? --Aero Slicer 15:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Briefly: type #REDIRECT ''name of target page''. For more details, see [WP:Redirect]]. JohnCD (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 08:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Re:Liz[edit]

I saw your comments and the quote over at the RFA talk page, and I think I get what you were trying to say. To borrow a little from Ray Bradburry: "We are living in a time when flowers are trying to grow on flowers instead of growing on good rain and black loam. Even fireworks, for all their prettiness, come from the chemistry of the earth. Yet somehow we think we can grow feeding on flowers and fireworks" Is that about right? TomStar81 (Talk) 22:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 04:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer. You have new messages at Airplaneman's talk page.
Message added 14:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Airplaneman ✈ 14:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TPG[edit]

Please read WP:TPG and do not do stuff like this. It is a classic example that proves my point, ie: inexperienced contributors can unwittingly disrupt things at RfA. - Sitush (talk) 10:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improper page move[edit]

Please see my request here concerning your improperly executed and undiscussed move of 2015 Washington, D.C., mass murder to 2015 Savopoulos family massacre (along with the associated Talk page). General Ization ^Talk 16:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The pages have now been moved back. Please do not move them again without seeking and achieving consensus on the article's Talk page, and ensure that when and if you do move a page, you do so properly so that the page histories remain with the renamed pages (which you did not do in the prior moves). General Ization ^Talk 16:16, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harmad Vahini (August 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harmad Vahini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Aero Slicer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fiction template[edit]

You applied two tags to Murder of Anni Dewani. The first, which is appropriate until issues are resolved, is the NPOV tag. The second is puzzling. You added a template that the article fails to differentiate between fact and fiction, and should be rewritten according to the fiction guidelines. Since the article is fact, since Ms. Dewani was murdered, and since what is in dispute is only the matter of involvement of particular persons, this template is in my opinion incorrect. Unless you can find a template that states that the article should be rewritten according to the fact guidelines, I will have to remove the template when the article comes off full-protection. Please explain the template here. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon (talk) When criminals get arrested they are advised by their lawyers to cook up stories which would create suspicion on husband. Their story was seen as the ultimate truth when i read this article. And you must read these in detail why the murderers are not St. Thomas who feeds poor and adopts orphans.

It is true that the case as described mixed fiction and fact, but the template was the wrong template, because it said to rewrite according to fiction guidelines. Ms. Dewani was murdered. That is a fact. I understand that it mixed fact and fiction, but telling the other editors to rewrite according to fiction guidelines missed the point. Thank you for trying to help. Which St. Thomas, anyway? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.theweek.co.uk/people-news/7659/anni-dewani-was-raped-new-evidence-suggests

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8335810/New-evidence-indicates-Anni-Dewani-was-sexually-assaulted-before-her-murder.html

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/africa/honeymoon-victim-dewani-murdered-in-rape-attempt-30661821.html

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/08/anni-dewani-south-africa-collapse-trial

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-2056577/Shrien-Dewani-Naive-Certainly-But-guilty-murdering-wife-Anni.html

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/shrien-dewani-trial-recap-updates-4428800

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/africa/article4235257.ece

Aero Slicer 13:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Hi. Here is something for you to read. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Aero Slicer. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaiho Sangyo (September 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaiho Sangyo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Aero Slicer![edit]

Happy New Year!

Aero Slicer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.