User talk:BalluHome

November 2019

Hello BalluHome. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Bloom Consulting, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BalluHome. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BalluHome|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 19:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrOllie I am sorry, I am new one here, is it correct way how to answer your message?

Hello, again, thank you for your message! I understand your worries, but I recently just started to get interested of on editing Wikipedia, I am very sorry, if I do it wrong way, I am not paid, but I should admit that I am interested in Nation Branding, I just read some book and articles and thought that I can share some information on wikipedia, as I noticed some pages, which I think need to be updated or restructured. I sorry, if I did it wrong way! I would be happy, if you would leave me some guidances how to do it the right way. I really believe that my edits are useful, but if you disagree, I would like to receive some solution on this. --BalluHome (talk) (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2019

Hello. The above is almost the right way to reply to the messge. Please in future place the reply in the same section as the message being replied to. Pleas indent it with one or mor colons at the start of the paragraph, as I am doing now. Notifying the other person is a very good idea, but for the ping (notification) to work, it must be placed and the comment signed all in the same edit. Follow the link to read all about how notificatiosn work here on Wikipedia. This will alert MrOllie as you apparently intended. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As for your substantive question, there is nothing wrong with editing a particular topic you happen to be intrested in. We do get a great many paid ewditors, and editors who are not paid, but have a Conflict of interest by editing article about topics they are closely associated with. In general, when adding content that might be challanged, it is good to cite a reliable source. Read Referencing for Beginners to learn how to format a citation. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to message

I am sorry, I am new one here, is it correct way how to answer your message?

Hello, again, thank you for your message! I understand your worries, but I recently just started to get interested of on editing Wikipedia, I am very sorry, if I do it wrong way, I am not paid, but I should admit that I am interested in Nation Branding, I just read some book and articles and thought that I can share some information on wikipedia, as I noticed some pages, which I think need to be updated or restructured. I sorry, if I did it wrong way! I would be happy, if you would leave me some guidances how to do it the right way. I really believe that my edits are useful, but if you disagree, I would like to receive some solution on this. (talk) 22:00, 13 November 2019

BalluHome, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BalluHome! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, BalluHome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is so inspiring! Thank you for your time and so kind answer! I will try to dive deep into wikipedia! Thank you for useful links. And I already found Teaspice and asked questions there. :) BalluHome (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi BalluHome! You created a thread called How to remove Third party template message at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Magic and Theater Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Magic and Theater Museum, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://eng.lsm.lv/article/culture/culture/museum-of-magic-opening-soon-in-latvia.a378647/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D2-Analytics (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:BalluHome/D2-Analytics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:BalluHome/D2-Analytics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 10:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:D2-Analytics, from its old location at User:BalluHome/D2-Analytics. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 17:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D2-Analytics (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All you did since the previous decline was add a link to the company’s own website. If you resubmit this again with little or no improvement it will be nominated for deletion at MfD.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D2-Analytics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:D2-Analytics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:D2-Analytics

Hello, BalluHome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:D2-Analytics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:D2-Analytics

Hello, BalluHome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "D2-Analytics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:D2-Analytics

Hello, BalluHome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "D2-Analytics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]