User talk:BeingIndian593
Welcome!
|
October 2014
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belgaum. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Caution for disruptive edits, including unexplained removal of content with a delibeately misleading edit summary. Thomas.W talk 13:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
BeingIndian593, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi BeingIndian593! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC) |
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:02, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]Your recent editing history at Belgaum shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 17:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:BeingIndian593 reported by User:Thomas.W (Result: ). Thank you. Thomas.W talk 17:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:49, 1 November 2014 (UTC)