User talk:Bejrisch

Orphaned non-free image File:Snow Tent ad.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snow Tent ad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Snow Tent Pond.jpg

Hello, Bejrisch. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Snow Tent Pond.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Meadow Lake city panorama.jpg

Hello, Bejrisch. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Meadow Lake city panorama.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Iceland, California, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. So, I reverted you here also. First of all, you removed ALL the sourced information that was there, information that was valid and properly formatted and verified. Second, besides the formatting problems (with how articles should look, how references are done, etc.) you are adding too much chatter, and the writing needs to be much more on point and more economical. Drmies (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't fully understand your comments. I have been posting histories about Nevada County for many years and this is the first complaint I have received. I don't know what it means to make test edits. I certainly did not intend to do that. I have never worked in a sandbox. I usually remove some of the abbreviated information in the existing histories since the invitation is to flush the stubs out. And information that is there is not always historically correct. I'm not sure what to say about the formatting problems since I am using Wikipedia format and as I said, this is the first complaint I've received after about 20 or 30 posts. I don't know what you mean about chatter and everything that I write has a footnote to its source. I would like to keep going, but if you're not satisfied,let me know and I'll stop posting to Wikipedia Bejrisch (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get the reply I left on November 27? I would appreciate the restoration of the histories you deleted or a response. I have several more I want to post. Thanks Bejrisch (talk) 22:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said "test edits" because I wanted to be kind. "Chatter" means the content you added was not relevant, not of encyclopedic value. It was chatty. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please give me an example of a sentence or paragraph that is chatty with an explanation of how I can improve. Thank you Bejrisch (talk) 18:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted this to arbitration, since I would like to keep posting. I understand I have to notify you of the arbitration request. Bejrisch (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I sent this message to the editor who has been deleting my posts a month ago and have gotten no reply. Not sure what to do now.

My Wiki name is Bejrisch. I live in You Bet, California and chair the Nevada County Historical Landmarks Commission. For about the last 10 years, I have been flushing out the stubs on Wikipedia for Nevada County historic mining communities that are now ghost towns. So far I have posted about 25 histories. Recently, a new editor started taking them down. This is the message he sent me and the reply I sent him. I have heard nothing further. I would like the histories I posted to be restored and to be permitted to post several more that I have written.

"Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Iceland, California, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. So, I reverted you here also. First of all, you removed ALL the sourced information that was there, information that was valid and properly formatted and verified. Second, besides the formatting problems (with how articles should look, how references are done, etc.) you are adding too much chatter, and the writing needs to be much more on point and more economical. Drmies (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)"

"I don't fully understand your comments. I have been posting histories about Nevada County for many years and this is the first complaint I have received. I don't know what it means to make test edits. I certainly did not intend to do that. I have never worked in a sandbox. I usually remove some of the abbreviated information in the existing histories since the invitation is to flush the stubs out. And information that is there is not always historically correct. I'm not sure what to say about the formatting problems since I am using Wikipedia format and as I said, this is the first complaint I've received after about 20 or 30 posts. I don't know what you mean about chatter and everything that I write has a footnote to its source. I would like to keep going, but if you're not satisfied,let me know and I'll stop posting to Wikipedia Bejrisch (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)"

Bejrisch Bejrisch (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Drmies wasn't aware of your message; you didn't link to their username so they wouldn't have been notified. I've notified Drmies in the previous sentence, so no worries. For now on, you can notify people off their talk page by using the {{U}} template. (So, for example, {{U|Example}}). I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 16:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's perhaps not the canned message I would have chosen when taking down your edits, but the main problem I see is that you are adding history information (mostly) without citing a source or with references that are so non-specific as to be unverifiable. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your help, bu I am a bit confused. there is a citation to every statement of fact- to a contemporary history book, newspaper article etc. How can is be more specific? Bejrisch (talk) 23:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace L. Suarez (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by VickKiang were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Trivial mentions, interview and listings of cases Grace participated in are not independent significant coverage that meets the basic biographical notability guideline. Additionally, for a biography of living person it is undesirable for a paragraph of the career section and personal life section, which has some potentially contentious information, to be unsourced. Also, I spotchecked this ref which does not seem to support the BLP-related claim that Ms. Suarez was very active in a variety of continuing education efforts. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace L. Suarez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VickKiang (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement in ref 1, "Some of this article is based on a series of oral interviews with the author", is a problem: Wikipedia does not accept "Personal communication" as a form of reference, but only uses information from Reliable independent published sources. The fact that you have talked to her also suggests that she may be a friend or family member, about whom you should not be writing because of Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest rules. It might be better to publish an article about her in a local newspaper or magazine. That publication could then be used as one source for a wikipedia article. PamD 08:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bejrisch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VickKiang (talk) 00:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bejrisch! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Floquenbeam (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bejrisch, the above is a standard template, but I also wanted to add: WP does a pretty crappy job of explaining how WP:Dispute Resolution works to people who haven't used it before. I suspect the ArbCom case you opened will be closed soon as "premature"; it's kind of the last step in our dispute resolution process, not the first. Kind of like going directly to the Supreme Court before trying Small Claims Court. Anyway, I think the disagreement you're having with Drmies can be settled with a discussion at Talk:Little York, California. To be fair, you should know I'm a friend of Drmies', but this is low stakes enough that I hope you won't think my involvement here is some kind of trap. Let me know if you need help with anything. Or, your use of the {{helpme}} template above is good too. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Offer to help

Hello, Bejrisch. I have been an active Wikipedia editor for over 13 years and an administrator for over 5 years. My wife and I moved to Grass Valley in late 2021 to be closer to our granddaughter and her parents who also live in Grass Valley, and are enjoying learning more about Nevada County and its history. I noticed your arbitration request and regret that you had a bad experience with Drmies. He is an administrator who I respect very much but I think he made a an error with regards to your articles about former Nevada County towns. I would like to offer to help you restore these articles and would be willing to copyedit them and trim them and bring them into a more encyclopedic style. Feel free to reach out to me at any time. Cullen328 (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I started with Iceland, California. Cullen328 (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Concurring with Floquenbeam and Cullen328. Drmies was one of several admins and editors whom I idolised/admired from the start of my Wikipedia career, but, like Cullen328 stated, he probably made errors regarding your edits to former towns in California. If you need any help, you can reach out to me, or to them. I'll start with Polaris, California. Tails Wx 19:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bejrisch Arbcase declined

Hello Bejrisch, I've removed the "Bejrisch case request", as it was declined by a majority of the arbitration committee. The committee felt the dispute was premature. There are helpful comments from other editors here, and I encourage you to read them and continue editing. Let me know if you have any questions. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 21:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Grace L. Suarez

Hello, Bejrisch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grace L. Suarez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Grace L. Suarez

Hello, Bejrisch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grace L. Suarez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]