User talk:Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa

Mauryan Empire

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Maurya Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 12:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021: Please sign your discussion posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Caste system among South Asian Muslims, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my additions I only added a few new sections and all of those are sourced from Wikipedia Everything is perfectly written I don't see any reason to remove them Durranis Did fight many battles And those battles are some of them They should be published Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 06:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dāsānudāsa. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dyaus‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 17:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invititation

Hello! Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Can you please elaborate how to join. Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 02:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to Teahouse and post any question you have.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Hi Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa! Thank you for your edits to Forced conversion. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Rohingya genocide into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 02:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

copied content from rohingya genocide; see that page's history for attribution. Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 02:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You would provide the attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, which would be Forced conversion. I've already done that for you at that article, but please take care of this yourself if you re-use text from any other Wikipedia articles in the future. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 03:40, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

It appears that you don't care for our policies and almost all your edits have been problematic and have had to be reverted or fixed by others, and you don't seem to be interested in taking any feedback. Any further disruption and your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 03:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what is your connection to Krao212?

Krao212 Who?? Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 08:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe some of my edits are problematic and harsh as well But most of them are correct Including the Buddhist section as well as the mauryan empire section

Can you please elaborately details about those reverted edits I would make sure to not edit like that in the future Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romila Thapar

No, Romila Thapar is not a terrible source diff. It's clear from what position you're editing; it seems to me that SpacemannSpiff is right. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About time. It's difficult to keep track of all the things he's messing up. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mess Up anything I just added a article sourced by Wikipedia What's wrong in that It's still a part of durrani conflicts why can't it be included Third battle of panipat is included in that page So why not other battles Please properly explain why Did you remove those Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 17:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, refusal to listen to feedback, making errors in articles and refusing to acknowledge them or correct behavior.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 17:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unblocked for the following reasons 1: adding sources without confirmation 2: not checking it and adding wrong info 3: continuously adding random articles from a Wikipedia page to another one 4: arguing about articles in a rude manner So I am apologising for my commited mistakes For the prevention 1: I would first use the talk section to discuss the change 2: I would use more verified sources 3: I would take the help of editors to make the article better 4: I would listen to other ideas and comments from other editors and based on all of this I would do a concluding edit nor no edit 5: I would improve my Wikipedia resourcefulnessBhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given this, I'm unwilling to block you. That comment isn't egregious or anything but it does indicate you either suffer from WP:CIR or are just trolling. Either way, I'm afraid you are demonstrating the project is better off with you blocked. Yamla (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for the following reasons 1:adding sources without confirmation 2:not checking it and adding wrong information 3:continuously adding random articles from a Wikipedia page to another one. 4:arguing about articles in a rude manner 5: disruptive editing So I really apologising for my commited mistakes For the prevention 1:I would first use the talk section to discuss the change. 2:I would use more verified sources (google Books, verified articles etc) 3:I would take the help of editors to make the article better. 4:I would listen to other ideas and comments from other editors and based on all of this I would do a concluding edit or no edit at all. 5: I would improve my Wikipedia resourcefulness. 6: I would provide my own original input to an article rather than just copying it from another page. 7: I would report my edited changes to the head editor everytime I edit. The last unblock request wasn't a troll I just made a spelling mistake I'm really sorry for my mistakes. Please take a little bit of time to review my mistakes and tell me how can I improve my editing. Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 11:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no "head editor"; this is a group project with volunteer editors from all over the world, none of which have any more authority than anyone else. I think that it is possible for you to be unblocked, but it would be good for you to provide an example of a substantive edit you would make which would demonstrate proper sourcing. The process to do so is as follows: This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how can I copy or even use articles if I'm blocked can you please properly explain me about what I have to do? Bhima Palavīṉamāṉa (talk) 19:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

(Combining all three requests into one)

While you are blocked, you can read all of Wikipedia like any other user, but the only page you can make changes to is here on your user talk page. Instead of "edit", you may see a "view source" option.

The instructions tell you to copy (with attribution) a page that you want to improve (try to do smaller pages, or it can get unwieldy) here to your user talk page and make your edits.

The copy operation is a normal copy-paste operation on your computer from the text in the "view source" window into the text box from in your "New section" window opened on your user talk page.

Make your edits to that copy, including the cleanup items mentioned in the instructions.

You're welcome to ask more questions if any of that is unclear. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

karna article new image

previous version:

{{Infobox character | color = #FFC569 | image = Karna in Kurukshetra.jpg | alt = Karna

edit suggestion:

{{Infobox character | color = #FFC569 | image =https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/5f/70/07/5f7007b7ae0c1abddd6ee03c1be1afd1.jpg | alt = Karna

can we use this new image ?/ the this image is from a statue at karnal and accurately describes karna

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gosh, A. (1964). Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62. New Dehli: Archaeological survey of India. pp. 50–52

Template:Gosh, A. (1964). Indian Archaeology: A review 1961-62. New Dehli: Archaeological survey of India. pp. 50–52 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]