User talk:Carabinieri/Archive5
DYK
[edit]I have added one; Do you want me to give the credits so you can proceed with putting it on the main page? --Parker007 19:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Why did you remove that one. I say we start putting 7 articles up to prevent backlogs etc. --Parker007 19:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Already re-entered by Undoing my last edit. --Parker007 20:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Dude (musical) on DYK for 25 Feb 2007
[edit]Thank you for the nomination! — ERcheck (talk) 05:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Oooh - rollback! What possible reason is there to pipe Vakıflı? - NYC JD (make a motion) 22:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Important Question!
[edit]When you say this"If you don't like the layout of this page please do change it.",do you really mean we can change it?Trampton 16:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
Your DYK nomination for Japanese people in Russia was successful
[edit]Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 18:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
:)
[edit]- To have it up faster, on History of the Jews in Libya,please create a discussion,Thanx! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Trampton (talk • contribs) 20:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
- Sorry, I don't get what you mean. Create a discussion on what? Have what up faster?--Carabinieri 20:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- On the file History of the Jews in Libya please create a discussion page, it has not been created,that way if any one has a conversation they want to share , the page is already set up.
- And if it is a new user that still is getting around?And he does not know how to ask someone on talk pages of that user,what is he supposed to do?
HOw do I create the discussionpage,then? Put Wikiproject Jewish or something?
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 13:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
The Log from the Sea of Cortez
[edit]Can you please look again at the FAC for The Log from the Sea of Cortez. I understand your concerns (as I had the same issues when writing it) and would like to work towards addressing them. I'm wondering whether a simple retitling would be effective. Yomanganitalk 10:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--Yomanganitalk 12:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Your DYK nomination for Veniamin Kagan was successful
[edit]Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 21:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007
[edit]The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 14:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 15:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:Red Links
[edit]And on for example, here, when you click edit,at the bottom it says do not put people without an article, so I am thinking therefore unredden or delete,correct?
Oh, I'm sorry I forget to put it.I mean on Under various months like for an example:December 5th,very often under "Births" and "Deaths", it will show people that lead to red links.
My RfA
[edit]Thanks (or schönen dank, if you prefer) for your support in my recent RfA which passed unanimously - thus proving that you can indeed fool some of the people some of the time. I'm still coming to terms with the new functionality I have, but so far nothing bad has happened. As always, if there's anything you need to let me know, just drop me a line on my Talk page. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Oliver_Kahn_06-2004.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Oliver_Kahn_06-2004.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Small mistake
[edit]- [1] But glad it made it to the main page as a DYK. Thanks for your time and efforts on this project. Smee 12:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
- My pleasure, and thanks for the compliment! I find that creating new articles as opposed to editing existing ones can be more fun, especially that initial search for sourced-citations, and images if possible. Smee 12:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
DYK
[edit]--Majorly (o rly?) 19:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK... Mistake
[edit]Ummm, you credited me with the creation/expansion of Leo J. Ryan Federal Building for DYK, when I have never even heard of the article (or the building!) So, I think something strange must have gone on... someone fraundulently crediting me with the article? What if this happens, but in reverse? Perhapes the DYK system is too easily manipulated and or penetrated? On the other hand, if someone did credit me, I can't fathom why... Anonymous Dissident 23:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- A related thread has been posted here. -- Jreferee 07:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 10:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the nomination! — ERcheck (talk) 05:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
William Stark
[edit]Is this article suitable for DYK? or just the 'Darwin Awards'.
William Stark (1741–1770) was an English physician who investigated scurvy by experimenting on himself with fatal consequences.... By November 1769 he was living on nothing but pudding, albeit with black currants to celebrate Boxing Day. He had considered testing fresh fruits and vegetables but was still working through tests with honey puddings and Cheshire cheese when he died in February 1770. Autodidactyl 10:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Monument to the Heroes of the Military Engineers' Army on DYK for 6 March 2007
[edit]Thank you for the nomination! — ERcheck (talk) 02:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Historical Eastern Germany
[edit]Perhaps you'd be interested in this:Talk:Historical_Eastern_Germany#Requested_move. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 05:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 14:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 23:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Klasies River Caves on DYK for 7 March 2007
[edit]Thank you for the nomination. — ERcheck (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
HELP!
[edit]Is it possible for me to move User:71.96.245.52?and how,I forgot!User:Trampton
Never mind,I re-named the account,thanks anyway Carabinieri!Trampton
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 15:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: DYK
[edit]Hello,
Thanks for updating the DYK template. However, in the hook, the word "what" is missing. Please include the same so that it is corrected in main page appearance. I have bolded the word below, for your reference.
- ...that Mayurasharma was the founder of the Kadamba Kingdom of Banavasi, the earliest native Kingdom to rule over what is today Karnataka state, India?
Thank you, - KNM Talk 19:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the DYK possible.Dineshkannambadi 00:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for choosing this article as a part of March 8, 2007 Did You Know --VS talk 21:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Next update
[edit]I was perusing dyk next updates. For Hurricane Guillermo, I don't see that the information in the proposed dyk entry appears in the article. No mention of 1949 at all.--Fuhghettaboutit 13:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Question about DYK articles
[edit]The article Geison is March 5 DYK nomination. It seems to be a very nice article, but has a merge tag on it (which I noted on the nomination page). There has been some discussion of the merits of merging on the article's talk page; but, I dont' think the issue is resolved. Do you think that it is ok for the article to be on DYK with a {{merge}} tag still in place? — ERcheck (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Quick question...
[edit]- Sorry to trouble you, but is there a way to add the DYK notification template that the article made it to the main page, for the Talk:List of groups referred to as cults in government reports page? Thanks again for your time and recognition of the article! Smee 00:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC).
As promised I have created a feed for "good" articles (User:AlexNewArtBot/GoodSearchResult). I have added it to the bottom of the Template talk:Did you know. The rules need tweaking but I hope the result is somehow usable Alex Bakharev 01:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Red Eye Deletions
[edit]God damnit! I *just had the Red Eye deletion restored and you took it out again. I'm going to put it back in with a discussion page, DON'T TAKE IT OUT!!
Something for you here
[edit]![]() | This user would like to wish you a happy St. Patrick's Day. |
Trampton 13:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC).
DYK
[edit](Ich glaube dass die Artikel zwei "hooks" hat, oder?) --BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Soweit ich mich erinnere hat User:KNM auch einen Vorschlag für diesen Artikel gemacht, wobei der "hook", der genommen wurde von mir stammt.-- Carabinieri 23:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Actors Theatre of Atlanta
[edit]Can you please undelete the page we began on Actors Theatre? Is there something about the way the article was written (format).
Actors Theatre is very notable since it was the very first professional theatre company in Atlanta to open as an all Equity professional Theatre company - a city that now has surpassed Chicago for the number of theatre companies.
Our Board of Advisors included Uta Hagen until her death in January of 2004 - the philosophy of the styleof acting we use is based on my 20 years of studies with herin New York at HB Studios as wellas with her protege, Ted Brunetti. In addition, Joe Mantello and Peter hedges are Advisory Board Members.
Actors Theatre's work has been critically acclaimed and continues to present world class theatre.
Please advise how we can be relisted.
Thank you for your consideration -
Jay Freer Founder Producing Artistic Director Actors Theatre of Atlanta
Moosebutter AfD Closure
[edit]Can you zap the associated image files that were listed as part of the AfD? Obliged! — Whedonette (ping) 16:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]I have to say, I really did not know that! --howcheng {chat} 06:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]Hello, I am fine with the modified DYK hook for Kuppalli. However, it has been moved to Expired noms section now. The hook was added 3 days back, and till now there was no concerns raised. Now, after you provided the modified nom, and before I provide my response it has been moved to Expired noms. I believe, it is still eligible to be selected for DYK. It was created on 12th and further expanded on 13th (Article history). Request you to put this in the NextUpdate. Thanks. - KNM Talk 04:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Der Nazi Tulkolahten
[edit]Lieber Carabinieri, ich habe Anzeige wegen Rassismus gegen Tulkolahten an der Polizei in München gemacht. Seine IP-Adresse jetzt unter Beobachtung. Schreib bitte Jimbo. Danke. --Dr. Steller 09:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- PS. Antwort bitte im Privatmail.
- PPs. Und noch etwas: ich bin registrierte Minderheiten-Deutsche, und ehemalige Minderheiten-Abgeordnete in Ungarn, deshalb muß die Polizei nach dem EU-Recht mit meinem Anzeige beschäftigen. So ist das Leben. Die Minderheiten haben schon Recht in der EU. --Dr. Steller 09:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Next update
[edit]Why did you remove my entries? Bondkaka 11:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- So you exchanged my suggestion with an expired nomination... Right? Bondkaka 11:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- You cannot start your own rues by exchanging nominations which are about to expire, with expireed nominations. And if a dispute is resolved, I understand the article has up to another 5 days to make it. I would suggest that this "problem" is fixed within the next couple of days. -- Bondkaka 11:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've never heard of a rule that states that an article has another five days once a dispute has been resolved. I don't think there's anything wrong with bending the rules in certain cases, especially in cases like this one. Russian legislative election, 1906 can be used the next time DYK is updated.-- Carabinieri 12:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Carabinieri! Actually, there is. Otherwise, artificial disputes would risk to disqualify eligible nominations. I think user:Bondkaka did a good job moving nominations to the Next Update. The problem here is that the "disputed" article is competing with other articles that are just about to expire. Right now, there is a good balance of articles, so let's wait with the article till later in the day (Next update already includes an architecture based article, and two might just be one too many). Camptown 12:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've never heard of a rule that states that an article has another five days once a dispute has been resolved. I don't think there's anything wrong with bending the rules in certain cases, especially in cases like this one. Russian legislative election, 1906 can be used the next time DYK is updated.-- Carabinieri 12:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Oh - is there such a rule? Where? -- ALoan (Talk) 17:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Though I'm all for turning a blind eye and including entries that are expired by a day or so, if they were nominated early, I haven't been able to find that rule anywhere either.-- Carabinieri 17:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Quite. I think it would be quite a change in current practice. However, if "disputes" were being created tactically, to block an article, I may change my mind.
- Is this discussion worth mentioning on WT:DYK? -- ALoan (Talk) 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--howcheng {chat} 18:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
For all of your hard work...
[edit]![]() |
The DYK Medal | |
I give this DYK Medal to you Carabinieri in gratitude and commendation for all the work you do to keep DYK running at high standards. Thank you so much for all of your time and effots, the community appreciates it. - Yours, Smee 19:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC). |
- Feel free to post to your user page and/or leave on your talk page as you see fit. (Except of course, this part itself...) Smee 19:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC).
DYK
[edit]--howcheng {chat} 07:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations, and thanks for DYKing an article I worked on! LuciferMorgan 17:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome.-- Carabinieri 17:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--ALoan (Talk) 00:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)