User talk:Cglife.bmarcus

Welcome!

Hello, Cglife.bmarcus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dolotta (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Cglife.bmarcus, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cglife.bmarcus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments on Draft:Gilson (company)

Hi, saw you at the Teahouse and came to take a look.

Any reason for not using Gilson Inc as the name? The first thing I noticed was Gilson all by itself.

It would be great to see countries mentioned for - Gilson International BV, PureLab Plastics, and Armen SAS

Would a "global manufacturer" only do business in 10 countries?

"According to the company, they create lab instruments" Is this a rumor? why is there a qualification? How about a direct statement "the company creates lab instruments"

The grammar is a little off in "a free open-source electronic lab notebook, and all of Gilson's devices can connect to." maybe "that all of Gilson's devices" or "Gilson's devices can connect to it"

There is no such category:Companies based in Middleton, Wisconsin

Good luck with your draft! Dougmcdonell (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilson (company) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilson (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gilson (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, what you still have as references are not suitable at it includes catalog descriptions of Gilson products, Univ Wisconsin write-ups, content only peripherally mentioning Gilson, etc. My advice is continue to remove unsuitable references and hope there is enough left to support an article before the evaluation comes round again. David notMD (talk) 20:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an experienced editor's comment on using one's own website as source of information and citation: "Really you should try to avoid citing your website at all, except for very basic, indisputable factual information like location, number of employees, etc. See WP:PRIMARY about primary sources. Things like "vision" and "mission" or your own organization's description of what it does are hard to independently verify and should not be in Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia has no interest in what an organization has to say about itself." David notMD (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilson (company) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The advice you received at Teahouse is spot on. Wikipedia is not a directory. We only have articles on subjects that meet our standards for notability. You will need multiple reliable sources, totally and completely independent of the subject, which discuss the subject in detail. for a corporation or organization, at least some of those sources must be either widely circulated or must be from disperse geographic locations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilson (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gilson (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 21:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Positive displacement pipette has been accepted

Positive displacement pipette, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TeaDrinker (talk) 12:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cglife.bmarcus. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Theory Wellness

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Theory Wellness, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Theory Wellness where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.

Paid-for articles must be submitted through WP:AFC. MER-C 15:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reproducing other editor's signatures in reply posts

Please do not reproduce other editor's signatures in your replies to them. These signatures are for use by the editors themselves and are not meant to be used by others when referring to them in reply messages. Thank you! Regards, Spintendo 21:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Cglife.bmarcus! You created a thread called How do I rewrite a whole page while saddled with a conflict of interest? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Theory Wellness

Hello, Cglife.bmarcus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theory Wellness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Theory Wellness

Hello, Cglife.bmarcus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theory Wellness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Theory Wellness

Hello, Cglife.bmarcus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theory Wellness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Theory Wellness

Hello, Cglife.bmarcus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theory Wellness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cloud laboratory has been accepted

Cloud laboratory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Bkell (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]