User talk:Chandan Kanti Paul

Welcome

Hello Chandan Kanti Paul and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Farooq Abdullah, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 19:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop adding future successors to politicians' infoboxes. This goes against our Manual of Style. Per Template:Infobox officeholder/doc: "The infobox for an incumbent officeholder should not mention an elected or designated successor, or the end date of the term, until the transition actually takes place." Thanks. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 15:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Chandan Kanti Paul (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 15:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chandan Kanti Paul (talk) 15:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden

Hello Chandan Kanti Paul,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 09:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from United States Attorneys appointed by Joe Biden, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JW 1961^Talk 09:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Presidency of Joe Biden have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:03, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, discussions and consensus are not resolved through a simple headcount. We are not an experiment in democracy or internet anarchy. Please stop with your "count update" comments. They serve no useful purpose, and, technically, because you're relatively new here, you're not allowed to make comments on that discussion, especially if they are disruptive like those you are making. I suggest you go and take a look at our policies and guidelines, most precisely the one regarding article titles (WP:TITLE) and the ones regarding consensus (WP:CONSENSUS). Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to India–Palestine relations. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A simple look at the Internet Archive was enough to fix the link here... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Your comments at Talk:2021_Israel–Palestine_crisis were struck due to an arbitration ruling; non-EC editors cannot vote in requested moves. Please do not keep making the same comment again, someone will just keep striking it. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rafi Raza (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources, with citations p[laced inline in accordance with the guidelines at WP:REFB. Biographical article cannot be accepted without proper sourcing. If the item is re-submitted without significant improvement it may be rejected (rather than declined for improvement) and could be deleted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rafi Raza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rafi Raza, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 06:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chandan Kanti Paul! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 06:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you saying "As per WP:Crystal Ball rules" when the rules say something completely different?

You removed my mentioning of President Biden being scheduled to meet Queen Elizabeth II for the first time citing "as per WP: Crystal Ball rules". Unlike you I actually read the rules and my edit was perfectly acceptable under those rules. Let me quote you something from what you obviously didn't read:

Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place.

Now let us dissect this....

The President of the United States of America meeting the Queen of the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms for the first time.
Notable? Check.
Almost certain to take place? Check.
Verifiable? Check. (Reliable sources were added)

So I believe we can determine now that my edit fit the bill perfectly and my edits had no reason to be removed as no rules were actually broken.

So please explain why you are using your own made up rules to remove people's edits claiming them to be Wikipedia rules which I have just proven to you is not the case? JugulatorJJ (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardeep Singh Puri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister of Civil Aviation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:SpideyPack

Your edit on their user page was not needed. They have been indefinitely blocked already. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Chandan Kanti Paul (talk) 00:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shilpa Shetty have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. -- DaxServer (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Presidency of Jair Bolsonaro, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

German elections

It's complicated, but basically, the CDU and the CSU are the same party as far as results are concerned (CSU only runs in Bavaria; CDU runs everywhere but in Bavaria). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2022 Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly election. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Discuss on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics Venkat TL (talk) 12:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 12:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh Chandan Kanti Paul (talk) 12:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian National Congress without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lol1VNIO (talk • contribs) 12:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Indian National Congress, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use your sandbox instead. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

General Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 13:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Skarz. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Rajeev Chandrasekhar. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. skarz (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]