User talk:CharlesDennisBuchinsky

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CharlesDennisBuchinsky, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Westerners (1959 film), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Westerners (1959 film)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Westerners (1959 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of the Bulge (1955 film)[edit]

Hello CharlesDennisBuchinsky,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of the Bulge (1955 film) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did with the article The Westerners (1959 film). Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Graham (American director)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jack Graham (American director), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Someone with the name of Vanjagenije blocked me only because of the fact that I put something that I stipulated, meaning I did in my mind Please help me with... Blocking him just over that CharlesDennisBuchinsky (talk) 14:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC) Jack Graham[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Tell Vanjagenije that I only was sharing something that I made up Please help me with... Blocking Vanjagenije so he understands that I only made it up CharlesDennisBuchinsky (talk) 14:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Jack Graham[reply]

If you would like to request an unblock, you should use the {{unblock}} template to do so. Helpers who answer the {{help me}} request do not have the capabilities to unblock people. Primefac (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand. I blocked you because you were writing about things you made up after I warned you not to do so. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CharlesDennisBuchinsky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16056 was submitted on Jun 29, 2016 21:25:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije, if you choose to make it up, then you must and unblock me before 07/04/2016. If this does not occur, then I will officially be quitting my Wikipedia account, and resigning from the website. So you have two choices before tomorrow, make it up and unblock me, or I am quitting and resigning from the website. I'm not saying you have to make it up, but choose one choice before midnight, otherwise I am resigning from my account and quitting the website. I repeat, "Make up and unblock me before tomorrow, or otherwise I will be resigning from my account and quitting the website of Wikipedia. Otherwise, I'll make up more stuff and share them with people in the actual world. And find someone that can actually block the user on Wikipedia of Vanjagenije". Don't worry, I will have your name written down on stuff/people I don't trust if you don't unblock me. My list so far:

My trust list:

July 2016[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Vanjagenije (talk) 00:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CharlesDennisBuchinsky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16252 was submitted on Aug 01, 2016 02:29:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CharlesDennisBuchinsky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16466 was submitted on Sep 03, 2016 21:04:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, this is CharlesDennisBuchinsky, and I am officially off vandalism, and I have now become a critic. Now, if I get unblocked, I am only going to share what I have criticized and this is no joke, I actually criticize movies, music, shows, etc. I have recently given my reviews on the film From Russia with Love and the jazz fusion album Bitches Brew by Miles Davis.

I have recently reviewed 22, A Million by Bon Iver, after ranking Bon Iver on the list of greatest alternative artists. I have also recently banned Marilyn Manson from having any albums sold at my record store. I have also banned his song Coma White from my record store due to the fake impression of President JFK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.228.246.25 (talk) 02:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]