User talk:Chayobriggs

Welcome!

Hello, Chayobriggs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Chayobriggs/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chayobriggs/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Chayobriggs/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from huffingtonpost.com/entry/harmful-credit-myths-stop-believing_us_5b15c1dce4b093ac33a0ffd3. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chayobriggs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Chayobriggs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chayobriggs/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Chayobriggs/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chayobriggs! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chayobriggs/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Chayobriggs/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.chayobriggs.com/blog/number-one-credit-issue. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whispering^(t) 18:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chayobriggs/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Chayobriggs/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are many issues with this draft. It is unclear what the subject of the draft is really about. Please read through WP:FIRST and follow the advise there prior to any rewriting or re-submission of the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chayobriggs/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Chayobriggs/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chayobriggs

A tag has been placed on User:Chayobriggs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chayobriggs/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Chayobriggs/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 19:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Chayobriggs/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Chayobriggs/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Wikipedia:Help desk. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Please stop adding your autobiography you do not meet the WP:GNG guidelines like most of us who edit here. I suggest you use social media or start your own website. Wikipedia is not a venue for self promotion. Theroadislong (talk) 19:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Chayobriggs

A tag has been placed on User:Chayobriggs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 06:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked sock:

Lizzymcnett (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I suspect WP:UPE based on edit patterns. DMacks (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

I am working to get all the specifics right with creating a Wikipedia user page and write articles. I sent a request to be unblocked but am not sure if it was received. Can I at least write and submit articles, while the request is processing? Chayobriggs (talk) 13:39, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Chayobriggs. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Eni vak (speak) 21:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chayobriggs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I cannot write, edit or publicise for personal gain. I have spent the last several days, reading regulations and would vey much like the chance to submit articles again. As per my profession I believe I can be a valued member of the Wikipedia family, contributing my knowledge to education people in a constuctive mannor that meets your criterias. Thank you very much for your help Chayobriggs (talk) 22:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please review the post and associated links about conflict of interest above. You won't be allowed to write about yourself, your field, or anything related to your conflict of interest. What unrelated subjects do you want to edit about? If you just want to tell people about your field or what you do, you should use social media, a personal website, or other alternative forum. 331dot (talk) 06:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply, I have many interets in my life, but there was on article I have been working on for the last year, about alternative credit data. It was accepted and just asked to reword it, due to, they said it sounded like a book report. Plus, I have interests about language, among other things. Is that not what Wikipedia is about information, history, true accounts and events? I like to write and want to participate. What is the next step here to move forward?Chayobriggs (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequent comments should be standard comments, as you only need one open unblock request. Do you affirm that you will not directly edit about yourself, your field, or anything related to your conflict of interest? You may make edit requests on article talk pages in those areas. 331dot (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand that I cannot directly edit about yourself, your field, or anything related to your conflict of interest. Just one question? Can I work on the article that was previously accepted, but needed rewording "Alternative Credit data"? If not I understand and will do my best stay within the regulations of Wikipedia— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chayobriggs (talk • contribs)

This will need to be resolved in conjunction with the Lizzymcnett account; I'm going to look at what is going on there, too. 331dot (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can use edit requests for that article, as well. 331dot (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DMacks I have some thoughts on this, but how do you think this should proceed? I've declined the request of Lizzymcnett. 331dot (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chayobriggs:, let's start by clarifying the relationship of these two accounts. Are you the one and only person who uses these two accounts, or are either of them also shared with other individuals? This comment by User:Lizzymcnett left me a bit confused on that point. DMacks (talk) 05:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chayobriggs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, from now on I will be the only one using this account. User_talk:Lizzymcnett&diff=909644468&oldid=909401303 had log in to add articles and work on the bio, but as we learned that is not allowed. Since then we have corrected our mistake and I will be the only one using the account from now on. Chayobriggs (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm still confused by this "we". Who/how-many people else are involved in these accounts, either as a direct individual or under the direction of a third-party? DMacks (talk) 05:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chayobriggs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for the reply. I will explain one more time, the only other person who has logged into my account was lizzymcnett. All she did was write and edit the article alternative credit data, and work on my bio. All before my account was blocked. NO one else has used this account, or will ever again. I will be the only one from now on. All I want to do is complete the article I started a year ago. Is that possible? I don't know what else you need, or how esle to explain? I just want to get this matter cleared up.Chayobriggs (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still haven't explained why you're using the plural pronoun "we". Use of "we" implies multiple people. You haven't told us who these people are. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:13, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chayobriggs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We as in lizzy mcnett and myself as atated above. Two people (we) her and I. There is no one esle, and will never be. I used we as lizzy mcnett and I did not know that her using my account was unaccpetable. I dont know how else to be more clear.Chayobriggs (talk) 18:50, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 17:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for clarifying. I think the problem was that administrators couldn't tell whether you were talking about a friend or company that was paying you to spam Wikipedia. Spammers often speak in plural. For example: "We are sorry for spamming Wikipedia, but we didn't know any better." Accounts are supposed to be used by only one person, so when people use plural pronouns, it's both confusing and suspicious. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, for the clarifcation. I have been very frustrated. What happends now?Chayobriggs (talk) 03:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for an update on unblocking request?Chayobriggs (talk) 22:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you update me on the unblock request. I have answered all your questions and would like to know how long this process takes, and when my account will be unlocked? Or what else I need to do? Thank you,Chayobriggs (talk) 12:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have an open unblock request, further open requests are repetitive and unnecessary. It will be reviewed in due course, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC) :Thank you, ChayobriggsI am new to this process and wanted to know what to expect.Chayobriggs (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]