User talk:Chill doubt

T
O
O
L
B
O
X

Delete: {{delete}} • {{db|...}} • {{db-nonsense}} • {{db-empty}}
{{db-attack}} • {{db-bio}} • {{db-test}} • {{db-notenglish}} • {{db-repost}}
{{db-band}} • {{db-club}} • {{db-copyvio|url=url of source}} • {{db-vand}}
{{db-redirtypo}} • {{db-redirnone}} • {{db-blanked}} • {{db-talk}} • {{db-foreign}} • DLog

Warn: Table of warnings • {{uw-vandalism1}} • {{uw-delete1}} • {{uw-test1}} • {{uw-upv1}} • {{uw-tpv1}} • {{uw-error1}} • {{uw-npa1}} • {{uw-defamatory1}} • {{uw-biog1}} • {{uw-joke1}} • {{uw-npov1}} • {{uw-spam1}} • {{uw-copyright1}} • {{uw-creation1}} • {{uw-3rr1}} • {{uw-image1}} • {{uw-move1}} • {{uw-agf1}} • {{uw-mos1}} • {{uw-notcensored1}} • {{uw-unsourced1}} • {{nn-warn}} • {{ConflictOfInterest}} • {{empty-warn}} • {{spam-warn}} • {{recreated}} • {{test1article}}

Article tags: {{advert}} • {{tone}} • {{verify}} • {{Citation needed}} • {{Cleanup}} • {{Confusing}} • {{Context}} • {{disputed}} • {{TotallyDisputed}} • {{POV}} • {{Wikify}} • {{Diagram needed}} • {{Expert}} • {{Hoax}} • {{Importance}} • {{Inappropriate person}} • {{Notability}} • {{Inappropriate tone}} • {{Inuse}} • {{Intro length}} • {{Not verified}} • {{Unreferenced}}

AFD: {{subst:afd1}}
{{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat=Category | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ AfD • Precedents • Categories

Category and stub: categories • Stubcats • Stubs • Templates

Policy/useful: WP:CSD • WP:BIO • WP:TEMP • WP:MOS • WP:MWS
WP:MWA • WP:NOT • WP:CB • WP:CR • WP:HD • WP:CP • New • Cpydt • Prefix • MyEdits • Edits • Interiot's • GSearch • Correct • CProd • Hme • WP:DPL • AlexNewArtBot • Backlog

External: Alexa • Google • Google Images • IMDB • Dictionary • OneLook
World Maps • Music • ConvertRef • MetaTable • Unlinkspam

Cite: Cite • CiteEx • {{Cite web}} • {{Cite journal}} • {{Cite book}} • CITET

Requests: adminship • arbitration • checkuser • comment • de-adminship
deletion • expansion • investigation • mediation • move • protection
translation • undeletion • Block • FAC • CSurvey • PLib • SpTrans

Agathoclea's RfA

Hello, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. The final tally was 63/3/2, and I have now been entrusted with the mop. I hope I can live up to your trust, and certainly welcome any and all feedback. All the best, and thanks again! — Agathoclea 13:24, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by NotGonnaTellYouMyName

Hey, it's that Madonna guy again. And I wanted to know if you were still mad. Please respond.

Hello

I have moved User:CHILL DOUBT/HEADER to User:Chill doubt/HEADER. That's your correct User name. Wikipedia is case sensitive. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 22:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Chill doubt! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 17:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

64.131.21.148

Thank you for your support on User talk:64.131.21.148. You must have been watching New Changes! Hu 20:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries (and yes !) ;-) •CHILLDOUBT• 21:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newyorkbrad's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 20:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New user warning messages

Heya. Take a look at WP:UTM for the new warning messages. Things like {{test4}} are being deprecated. --Brad Beattie (talk) 21:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for catching my page vandalism! Crazy vandals, asking me to stop un-doing their vandalism... -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 16:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :-) •CHILLDOUBT• 10:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! =) H4cksaw (talk) 00:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :-) •CHILLDOUBT• 10:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up

Another user seems to have left you a message here. I was thinking about moving it to your talkpage, but considering the number of false statements and personal attacks involved, I'll leave it up to you as to how you'd like to handle it. FYI, El on ka 19:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 7 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harald T. Nesvik, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Yomangani ^talk 10:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Thank you for placing {{stub}} on articles. If possible please use a specific stub tag. There is a list to help choose at WP:WSS/ST. Thank you Ksbrown^talk 13:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPWatcher

You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give Martinp23 any feature requests or bugs. He'll also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if he's made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism

You are Welcome..ø~Cometstyles~ø ^{^(talk)}

71.93.179.58

Man, this guy just doesn't give up does he?

And why haven't the Administrators blocked him yet? I reported him ages ago.....

-- TheChrisD™ 12:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, it took them a while to get around to it, I think I've had 3 vandals on the backlog at once today.... -- TheChrisD™ 13:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your sub page

Hi you had a sub-page named "photos" and its only use was vandilism (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Chill_doubt/Photos&action=history) thank you. Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talkTodays Pick 22:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thats good also who is Htgeg he seems to be the user behind it, I reported him to AIV. Cocoaguy ここがいい _contribs^talkTodays Pick 22:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I corrected vandalism on Vernon Robinson's page, and you reverted. What gives? 129.22.53.246 21:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by User 72.10.124.202

Link to User's Talk Page

this user has received a number of warnings about vandalism and being blocked, but has not been blocked to date, yet continues to vandalize articles. what is the procedure for blocking that user? Whateley23 20:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 2

Thank you for taking the time to participate at the discussion in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project. I listened carefully to all concerns, and will do my best to incorporate all of the constructive advice that I received, into my future actions on Wikipedia. If you can think of any other ways that I can further improve, please let me know. Best wishes, El on ka 03:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thank You Note from Jehochman

		Ready to swab the deck!
		Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman ^Talk 03:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help on watford

thanks for sorting out my poor attempt to combat teh vandalism on the Watford page. Ceeess 10:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I have done something quite similar myself a number of times! Cheers •CHILLDOUBT• 10:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

COOL SIG!

I LOVE YOUR SIGNATURE!!!!!!!!IslaamMaged126 19:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SchoolLogo06-master.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um Yea

Why did you say i vandalized the page, i don't even edit wiki just look at it so get your facts strait, i hate being accused of things that i did not do! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.148.138 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The vandalism warning you are complaining about was issued back in March of this year, and was in response to the vandalism from someone on your IP address. You can see this yourself from this link. [1]

As dynamic IP addresses can be issued by Internet service providers to different people. I assume therefore that your internet service provider had, 9 months ago, assigned your current IP address to someone else. The best way to avoid confusion, such as you are clearly displaying, is to register for an account. That way, your edits will never be confused with anybody elses. Regards •CHILLDOUBT• 19:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting my edits.

Please stop mindlessly reverting my edits. Thanks Aliibn (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted poor quality edits which appear to have been where you have been disrupting wikipedia to make a point. Please read WP:POINT •CHILLDOUBT• 13:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, I guess a Muslim can't get a break around here! Aliibn (talk) 13:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if you are an athiest, whether you worship a sky fairy or whether you believe in the Loch ness monster. I do care whether you disrupt wikipedia to make a point - IMO the point you are making is very weak, but that is just an aside. Playing a victim card does not impress me •CHILLDOUBT• 13:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, it is quite obvious to me that you are mindlessly reverting all my edits as I disagreed with the Collective Wisdom of the Great White Fathers on the Talk:Muhammad page, pointing out that the images used aren't even accurate. Apparently, giving offense to Muslims comes as a higher priority to attempting accuracy for many editors here.

Rather than engage in the particulars of any edit I have done, you are simply blanking out everything I did. This suggests an agenda on your part. Aliibn (talk) 13:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated images where you have removed them, and removed silly text to Albert the Great where you were trying, poorly, to make a point. I assume in relation to Talk:Muhammad? •CHILLDOUBT• 13:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zenobia

You keep insisting on maintaining the 19th century Orientalist painting on this page. Why not replace it with the one I suggested on the talk page/ (Sorry, I don't know how to do that). Aliibn (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion - Its better than us reverting each other and trading punches... Ill reply on the talk page. Cheers •CHILLDOUBT• 14:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 3

Thank you for your participation in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate that landed on WP:100, but ultimately was deemed a successful declaration of consensus, and I am now an admin. I definitely paid close attention to everything that was said in the debate, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. I'm working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school, carefully double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools, with my main goals being to help out with various backlogs. I sincerely doubt you'll see anything controversial coming from my new access level. :) I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are a few more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status. If you do ever have any concerns about my activities as an administrator, I encourage you to let me know. My door is always open. Have a good new year, --El on ka 19:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad

Hi Chill doubt. While you are free to disagree with me, please do not accuse me of attempting to "censor" to "cater to religious sensibilities", especially when you have not shown the slightest awareness of the arguments I have forwarded. The longstanding consensus you cite has been upheld. Secondly, I am unsure as to why you restored TharkunColl's version in replacing the lead calligraphic image with a depiction, which enjoys no such consensus. ITAQALLAH 11:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be mindful of the contents you are removing in your reverts. You removed [2] the pictures I had added here [3]. --Be happy!! (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Captive State for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Captive State is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captive State until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CHILL DOUBT Header.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]