User talk:ChrisTofu11961/Archive 4

Orphaned non-free image File:Margo Smith--The Shuffle Song.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Margo Smith--The Shuffle Song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reba McEntire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Kind of Country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wanda Jackson

Hello. I just went through Wanda Jackson and corrected a numbering of coding errors. These were SFN errors. When you use the SFN template, only put the author's last name in the template. Also, you might want to go through each place you used a SFN template, as I notice you use P= no matter how many pages are involved. FYI P= is only if the reference is a single page, multiple pages should use PP= . Good luck with the GAC nomination. — Maile (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashley McBryde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluegrass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Barbara Mandrell-It Works for Me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Mandrell-It Works for Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LeAnn Rimes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coyote Ugly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

I nominated an article that you created for DYK on the main page - Template:Did you know nominations/It's Christmas, Eve. SL93 (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: Thanks so much! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LeAnn Rimes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Live Love.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for It's Christmas, Eve

On 24 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article It's Christmas, Eve, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2018 film soundtrack album It's Christmas, Eve by LeAnn Rimes originated from a movie in which Rimes played the main character? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/It's Christmas, Eve. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, It's Christmas, Eve), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66: Fantastic, just saw this. Thank you so much. Happy holidays! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 23:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janie Fricke discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wanda Jackson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wanda Jackson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ezlev -- Ezlev (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ezlev: Hello! Thank you for your feedback. I went back and made changes based on your suggestions. See below. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wanda Jackson

The article Wanda Jackson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wanda Jackson for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ezlev -- Ezlev (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wanda Jackson

The article Wanda Jackson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wanda Jackson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ezlev -- Ezlev (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Carly Pearce

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carly Pearce you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Carly Pearce

The article Carly Pearce you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carly Pearce for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Carly Pearce

The article Carly Pearce you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carly Pearce for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maren Morris discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMG.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heartforward

The article Heartforward has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per lack of notability. None of the sources on the page prove notability, some don't even mention the album. An online search only provided sales links, no coverage from what I could see.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@QuietHere: I disagree with your proposal. This page is notable and deserves to be seen. There is even a review I added for this article awhile back. I will add more if that is your concern. Sales links are also notable depending on what they discuss. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 15:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTofu11961: If there is more to add then please add it, because what's there currently isn't enough to justify keeping the page, hence my proposal. QuietHere (talk) 22:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to leave a reminder that the article will be deleted tomorrow (March 29, 6:30 AM Eastern Time). If you really think the page is worth saving then I'd recommend getting to work on it now or else you'll miss your opportunity (I believe there are ways of recovering deleted pages but that's probably way more of a hassle). QuietHere (talk) 10:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camaron Ochs--Heartforward.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Camaron Ochs--Heartforward.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. QuietHere (talk) 13:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roses & Lace

The article Roses & Lace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable independent release. Only one source is actually about the album; the rest is WP:PRIMARY or has nothing to do with it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer: Yeah, in reflection I think this was a bit of a stretch to be a full album article. You have my vote to delete. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 01:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of True Lies (song)

The article True Lies (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one source is actually talking about the subject, and it's only for approximately a sentence-and-a-half. That could easily be merged into the album's article (although that doesn't look much better). Nothing else here proves notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shame About That

The article Shame About That has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources don't prove notability independent of the album the song comes from.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three Chords and the Truth (song)

The article Three Chords and the Truth (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources fail to establish independent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of True Lies (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article True Lies (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Lies (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

QuietHere (talk) 15:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Three Chords and the Truth (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three Chords and the Truth (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Chords and the Truth (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

QuietHere (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shame About That for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shame About That is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shame About That until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

QuietHere (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Janie Fricke--Roses and Lace.jpg

The file File:Janie Fricke--Roses and Lace.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned by deleted album article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Live at Billy Bob's Texas (Lynn Anderson album)

The article Live at Billy Bob's Texas (Lynn Anderson album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no sources beyond AllMusic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Live at Billy Bob's Texas (Janie Fricke album)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Now & Then (Janie Fricke album)

The article Now & Then (Janie Fricke album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources is actually about the album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Priscilla Block

Template:Priscilla Block has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janie Fricke--Live at Billy Bob's Texas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janie Fricke--Live at Billy Bob's Texas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lynn Anderson-Live At Billy Bob's Texas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lynn Anderson-Live At Billy Bob's Texas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Judds in Concert

The article The Judds in Concert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable live album. All sources are about the Judds and not the album itself. No secondary sourcing found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janie Fricke--Now & Then.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janie Fricke--Now & Then.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Judds--In Concert.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Judds--In Concert.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of City Lights: Country Favorites

The article City Lights: Country Favorites has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notable references found and was released on a budget label. No singles were spawned from the album nor are any reviews present from this compilation album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connie Smith Sings Her Hits.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connie Smith Sings Her Hits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connie Smith-City Lights.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connie Smith-City Lights.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connie Smith-My Heart Has a Mind of Its Own.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connie Smith-My Heart Has a Mind of Its Own.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Barbara Mandrell

The article Barbara Mandrell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barbara Mandrell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sara Evans

The article Sara Evans you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sara Evans for comments about the article, and Talk:Sara Evans/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christmas with The Judds and Alabama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas with The Judds and Alabama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas with The Judds and Alabama (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA review of Pam Tillis

ChrisTofu11961, I wanted to let you know that I made some edits at Talk:Pam Tillis to straighten out some issues with the GA review. First, the only review should be at review page Talk:Pam Tillis/GA1; the actual review text should not be duplicated on the article talk page, so I moved the nominator's edits on that duplicate section to the real review page and deleted the duplicate review. We have a bot that transcludes the review page on the article talk page for people to see, and it did its job after I removed the duplicate text from the talk page and also fixed the GA nominee template, restoring it to how it had been so the bot could do its work. Note that the original nomination date should not be changed when the review is opened; indeed, no edit should be made until after the bot has done its work and set status from blank to "onreview". Once that's been done, you're free to change the status as necessary; I updated it to "onhold" since you had used the status "on hold". I'd like to suggest that you read the GAN instructions page for a step by step on what you as the reviewer should be doing along the way, so there aren't further issues as you proceed. Thanks for taking on this review, and best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:18, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Thank you for catching these errors! It has been a long time since I have done a GA article and had a hard time following the directions. Appreciate it! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 15:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]