User talk:SounderBruce
 | Please keep discussion of specific article issues on their respective talk page instead of dispersing the discussion; any additions here will be reverted and ignored. If there's something else you'd like to say, feel free to message me. I may or may not be able to respond in a timely manner. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| This is SounderBruce's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
Template question
[edit]Hi Bruce. I noticed you added a comment to another editor's talk page on 3 November 2019 which appeared, to my eye, to be boilerplate text generated by a template you used rather than text you composed yourself. My question is, what template generated that text? Thank you. Spideog (talk) 17:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Spideog: The template's name ({{uw-unsourced1}}) is commented out on that page. It was generated using Twinkle. SounderBruce 21:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, you have listed this for TFA at pending for November. I have tentatively reserved a date for it, but if you would still like it be considered you will need to nominate it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, which is now open. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reminder and for leaving the slot open. I have posted my blurb to TFAR. SounderBruce 00:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
A barncompass for you!
[edit]
|
WikiConference North America 2024 Barncompass |
| Thank you for successfully completing all 13 tasks in the 2024 edition of the Editing Challenge! We hope you continue to contribute towards different sister projects. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
MLS Cup 1999 scheduled for TFA
[edit]This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 21 November 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 12:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Golden W Award
[edit]
|
Golden W Award | |
| Congratulations! You have been awarded the Golden W Award for your contributions to each long-time section of the Main Page: a Featured Article at Today's Featured Article; articles listed on In The News, Did You Know and On This Day; and a Featured Picture at Picture of the Day. Your contributions to Wikipedia put you in a class of prolific, highly skilled editors. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 01:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
Congrats, you were nominated by @SounderBruce! You can display this using Template:Golden W UBX!
Category:Sound Transit logos has been nominated for merging
[edit]
Category:Sound Transit logos has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome SounderBruce! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 November newsletter
[edit]The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is 
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, 
BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, 
Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: 
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, 
Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, 
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, 
Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and 
AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!
The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.- Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.- BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
The Seattle Center
[edit]Clearly we see this differently. Can you provide some examples where e.g. Seattle Times calls the entire complex "The Seattle Center"? We're not talking about uses like, "The Seattle Center fountain" or "The Seattle Center Armory building" or "The Seattle Center Foundation. Speaking of which, please find an example of your usage anywhere on https://seattlecenter.org/ Thanks. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdsds: From The Seattle Times: This recent article heavily uses it, in reference to the whole complex, in addition to this 2008 article and this profile. The use on the official/promotional website does not factor into the Manual of Style, per examples at MOS:BRAND.
- I should also mention that the city council uses both forms [INDX& in legislation], but "the Seattle Center" seems to have a greater number of hits. SounderBruce 01:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for finding those. WP:DUE seems to apply, as there are multiple opinions on which is the preferred usage. Of course that flies in the face of consistency. Perhaps the article would benefit from a short section on the multiple ways used to refer to the site. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdsds: Unless a reliable source has significant coverage of the difference, it does not belong in the article. We just have to choose a rule that best fits the MOS and consensus and keep it standardized across all mention of the Seattle Center and its component buildings. SounderBruce 04:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- And are you willing to apply that same logic to the Central Park article? Rockefeller Center? New York Penn Station? Yellowstone National Park? Trafalgar Square? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 06:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdsds: Unless a reliable source has significant coverage of the difference, it does not belong in the article. We just have to choose a rule that best fits the MOS and consensus and keep it standardized across all mention of the Seattle Center and its component buildings. SounderBruce 04:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for finding those. WP:DUE seems to apply, as there are multiple opinions on which is the preferred usage. Of course that flies in the face of consistency. Perhaps the article would benefit from a short section on the multiple ways used to refer to the site. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)