User talk:Cutiejim22

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Cutiejim22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 12:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cedar Island Light

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cedar Island Light, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Cedar Point County Park. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Island (Sacketts Harbor) Light

I'm reviewing new pages. I came across this article that you created. I don't know whether you realize, but in some sense this is a negative step: it causes someone else more work than you put in it. I presume you cut-and-pasted the material. But I'm not sure whether it was from a copyrighted source. That's a big problem, because it means to fix it (or even to mark it patrolled) I would have to do research. Then, there's the task of actually fixing the non-standard formatting and content. I'm not an expert on the subject, so again, I would need to work carefully. So, if it took you 15 minutes to create the page, it would probably take me an hour to fix it. Whereas, if I had created it myself, I could have created it in 15 minutes, just as you did. But it wouldn't need another hour's work. Marking the article as "patrolled" has been avoided by other editors for days, so there's a good chance this article will just roll into the not-so-good Wiki article status, and stay there indefinitely. All that aside, the information looks interesting, and certainly better than a lot of the stubs which give the reader pretty much nothing interesting, so I'd encourage you, who probably is in the best position, to do a little more spit-and-polish. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The text is from the USCG site, the second link on the page, and I will clean it up as my time permits. I've had a few things delay that work. Ahwiv (talk) 01:19, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Light vs Lighthouse

I will not. The discussion you linked hardly came to a definitive conclusion; you can see that the issue was re-raised in 2008, but the stated concerns were never really addressed. Furthermore, this particular article has a number of mitigating circumstances, primarily that it is a retired light and thus the Coast Guard doesn't have any authority over its name. Besides, the article is clearly about the building, not the light at its pinnacle. In sum, WP:COMMONNAME trumps a 3-year-old discussion on a talk page as far as having community support. Powers ^T 19:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Burton C. Gray

The article Burton C. Gray has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. France3470 (talk) 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification (for Ahwiv)

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Jacob Morton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Grand Master

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Grand Line of the Grand Lodge of New York

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Grand Line of the Grand Lodge of New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MSJapan (talk) 23:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFC at WikiProject Freemasonry

While you are not listed as a project member, I thought I would extend the courtesy of notification, as this is obviously an issue you are involved with. See: WT:WikiProject Freemasonry#Dispute over instructions at Category:Freemasons. Best - Blueboar (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ahwiv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "alt" from image

Thanks for your edit to Church of St John the Baptist, Frome but I wondered why you removed the "alt" label from the description of the image? Wikipedia:Accessibility dos and don'ts says it is good practice to "provide alt text and a caption for most images". My understanding this helps those use text to speech readers understand what is in the image.— Rod ^talk 07:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rodw The format used didn't support an alt text. didn't notice alt= parm is the proper way, but have resolved that. Thanks. Ahwiv (talk) 10:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

coordinates of Lancaster Cathedral

Yes, I'd just worked out that the coords have been presented in the correct way a bit further down the infobox - sorry about that. Something about the wording of your edit summary made me think you were just removing coords because the parameters weren't recognised! PamD 15:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:MemoRieS FM 89.9 Cebu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MemoRieS FM 89.9 Cebu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:MemoRieS FM 107.1 Baguio.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MemoRieS FM 107.1 Baguio.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G3

Why did you tag File:IFM Tacloban.jpg and DYBQ-TV as hoaxes (1, 2)? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:IFM Cagayan de Oro Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:IFM Cagayan de Oro Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Easyrockbacolod.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Easyrockbacolod.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Easyrockcebu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Easyrockcebu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cutiejim22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 05:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Technically indistinguishable to Tatzumie16 and likely to many others.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 06:22, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Easyrockcebu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Easyrockcebu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:105.5 Easy Rock Bacolod.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:105.5 Easy Rock Bacolod.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Easyrockcdo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Easyrockcdo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]