User talk:Discospinster/Archive16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Gabor wavelet

Can you double check the deleted history for any signs of useful content. I was surprised to see it was only spam in the logs. The admins who deleted it are no longer active. Thanks. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 01:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

The first version of the article said "SWWw��IQ(I�(QWW��(��(��#" (at least it did on my screen), and the second version was simply a link to the Institut für Neuroinformatik's web page. There wasn't any spam per se, but there wasn't anything useful either. ... discospinster talk 01:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the check. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 02:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Stronghold Kingdoms

Hello, you recently (about 9 hours ago) deleted this article and gave the reason as being 'an article which does not indicate the importance of [...]'. I agree with that, however when I left the article last night (to go to sleep), I was in the middle of a discussion with Wyatt Riot about whether or not the article should be deleted. Not sure whether you saw it and exactly what happened once I left, but I would have liked to have been allowed a little more time to continue discussion and possibly add a bit to the article if no one else was going to. By citing the sources that I mentioned on the talk page I think that the article would satisfy the criteria under which you deleted it, so I consider it a shame if it isn't given a chance. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

No I'm aware it didn't cover the rules on this type of article, but now that I am back from a (well deserved) break I can do some more to the article. If you could restore the article to my workspace or something that would be appreciated. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


Hello! Our stub article "Sculptarch" was marked for speedy deletion. We took into account all your recomendations and edited text in compliance with the Wikepedia policy . would you be so kind as to look through text again and possibly reconsider your judjement and remove the "advertisment tag" from it. Since this article is a work in progress We will gladly accept any further criticism if there are any flaws left in the text. Sincerely, Authors of the "Sculptarch" article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lik-fond (talkcontribs) 16:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Rush Hour Rules

Dear 'Discospinster'.

It would be great if you offered some words of advice to help new users, instead of just deleting their entries. I'm only human and trying very hard to work out how to use the Wikipedia tools and processes, and all I get is someone else trying to delete my first entry!!!

I'm terribly sorry it doesn't meet your high standards (and yes, they are YOUR standards, as no-one else is trying to delete my words, and you can interpret the 'guidelines' in a number of different ways... and they are guidelines after all, not laws set in stone)!

Whatever happened to Wikipedia being created by the people for the people? I remember when it had a lot more freedom of expression, and less militant word-snobs on cyber-bully power trips.

Does my article hurt anyone? Does it tell any lies? Does it conflict with any other entires?

The subject matter may not yet be in the same league as Harry Potter or Sherlock Holmes, but it's on course to become that way. Why shouldn't this book be included in the site? Surely if something is already famous, no-one would need to look it up in the first place!

I've stumbled across a lot of awful entries in my time, short one-liners about some random village in the middle-of-nowhere, etc. Yet, I've never been obnoxious enough to think my view is more important than the contributor's view.

I hope you will read this note and offer me some suggestions on how I can improve my site, instead of just nominating it for deletion and sending me a link to some guidelines.

Huw Powell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Powellh (talkcontribs) 19:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Jon Schreiber

You recently deleted the page "Jon Schreiber", untruthfully citing (G3: Vandalism) as your reason for deletion. In its "Criteria for Speedy Deletion" section, Wikipedia describes pure vandalism as "blatant and obvious misinformation." I can assure you that this is not the case. Jon is idolized by children in the Boston area for his skills on the soccer field, but he is a hero in the homosexual community for the courage he has shown in his decision to publicly announce his homosexuality in the prime of his career. Even in the face of ridicule and discrimination, Schreiber has always been the consummate professional. He has used his local celebrity status as an elite athlete to help raise awareness of homosexuality in sports, and in doing so has transformed Boston into a city that is more accepting of homosexuals. Perhaps you are not familiar with this remarkable young man, or maybe you have simply confused him with another Jon Schreiber who has not accomplished half of what this one has. However, my fear is that you are one of the growing number of people in this world who believe that there is no place for homosexuals on Wikipedia. I hope for everyone's sake that this is not the case but regardless, I am asking you to correct your unfortunate oversight by restoring this article. After all, it would be a shame if the public was denied its chance to learn about this incredible human being.

Myersp (talk) 20:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Myersp

Don't use Wikipedia to play pranks on your friends. ... discospinster talk 23:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

OK so you think this is just a big joke you ignorant douchebag. If only we all had the ability to know everything in the world like you do, almighty Disco Spinster. Wikipedia used to be a bastion of free speech and expression, but assholes like you have turned it into Nazi Germany. Thank you, Hitler, for preventing millions of Wikipedians from learning about a great man. Myersp (talk) 21:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Myersp

I notice that you still have not provided any evidence that he is notable, or that he is indeed who you say he is. Dozens of articles show up on Wikipedia every day about so-called noted gay activists. Your attempt is not the first, and likely won't be the last. Be original, won't you? ... discospinster talk 21:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


Please can you explain how i can save the page koola from deletion i have provideed sufficient references etc. I will not let my sport die off in existance of wikipedia.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 22:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Deleted Article

Hi, I just updated the page with new content. Hope this meets the guidelines.

Malinthe (talk) 12:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

The copyright violation has been removed, which is good. I've wikified it and cleaned it up a bit to remove the more non-neutral language. ... discospinster talk 13:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Malinthe (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Nazarenko, Tatyana 01:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your comments to a new user. I have uploaded a new version of the page with just a one-liner quotation and except from the website evidencing the academic quality of work no external references. Expect that this meets the compliance requirements. Best, V474 (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Richard William Aguirre Article edited to establish "Significant Coverage"

Discospinster, I have edited the Richard Wiliam Aguirre Article and added several television and internet news stories that establish "Significant Coverage" for the article. This should be significant to stop the Richard William Aguirre Article from deletion. (Sdpolitics (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC))

Battle for Seves Island

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Discospinster. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Richard William Aguirre Article edited to establish "Significant Coverage" and "Notable in itself"

Please Stop Delete. Please do not remove this article . This article now meets the criteria for approval on wikipedia. All references have been added to address the issues of "significant coverage" and issues of establishing Richard William Aguirre as being notable in it self. I added Television and Internet News Story References establishing "significant coverage" for page, and Also I added a news paper article from the Obrag, July 20, 2009, about Richard William Aguirre, the environmental group "Save Sunset Cliffs" he founded in 2001 and the work that he and the group are doing in San Diego, CA. to preserve Sunset Cliffs Natural Park. The Group has hundreds of members and is an advisory group to the City Council of the City of San Diego. This should establish Richard William Aguirre as being notable in itself. Thank you, (Sdpolitics (talk) 18:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC))

Your arguments need to be made on the discussion page, not here. ... discospinster talk 18:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Sterizon article deletion

I read your note as well as the Wikipedia policies. But, there are a ton of companies right here on wikipedia that have a article about the company and its products. I am not sure how the 2 line article I posted is any different? Sterizon is a legitimate company doing business in the US. You can visit or google sterizon for more information. Please clarify. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sterizon (talkcontribs) 18:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Restore article

Could you please restore my article (Trustler).

I did not mention any references because I am the owner of the company, so I know it better than no one else. Or should I have referenced to once again?

I know you're doing a great job on Wikipedia, but hey, you shouldn't delete everything on your way, especially when authors prove you that they are right.

Cheers! Vivires (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

How do I prove the notability of an article?

How do I prove the notability of an article?

Where should I write the explanation? And how to restore the article?

Thanks. Vivires (talk) 07:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Presario 2100

You deleted someone's article for lack of meaningful content. I wish you hadn't, finding a scrap of info on this laptop is impossible. Something would have been better than nothing. Does it feel good to delete articles? You addressed the issue in your opening paragraph. Maybe you should relax on the deletions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't know which article you are referring to. There is nothing in the log at Presario 2100, and I can't find anything in my log that points to such a deletion. Could you be more specific? ... discospinster talk 23:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I should also point out that your assertion that "finding a scrap of info on this laptop is impossible" is precisely the reason that the article should be deleted. If there is nothing about it anywhere else, then it likely does not pass Wikipedia's notability criteria. ... discospinster talk 23:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

re: "coding errors"

Your attempt to "fix" coding errors has created more errors. The correct form for <ref name=HISINDI> is <ref name=HISINDI/>. Hope this helps you.--Auric (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


i love you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kctwister (talkcontribs) 16:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. ... discospinster talk 16:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new law-related task force for the J.D. curriculum

Hi Discospinster/Archive16,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 01:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Uh hey?

Why did you delete stuff on my page? --Tenant23 (talk) 02:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Wrong criterion?

Hello Discospinster, are you sure A7 should have been used for RotGB? A7 does not apply to films, and this article was recreated from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return of the Ghostbusters (4th nomination). Anyway, can you protect it so that it doesn't get recreated again? Thanks, Theleftorium 19:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I forgot to include the AfD discussion in the edit summary. Anyway, thanks for protecting the page! :) Theleftorium 20:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Working on meeting notable criteria for a biography

Hi. "Someone else" put a speedy delete tag on, which is a biography of a living person who is the president-elect of the United States Jewish War Veterans Women's Auxiliary, an organization dedicated to provided assistant to Jewish veterans. I was in the middle of providing sources, and hadn't got to working on the notability part. I see that you removed the speedy delete tag and improved the article regarding the categories. However, soon thereafter the original "someone else" deleted the page anyway.

I would like to continue working on the article, particularly with regard to meeting the notoriety requirement. It would be helpful to me if I could get your thoughts on why you removed the speedy deletion tag.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edstat (talkcontribs) 17:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyvio images

Hello DS, could you take a look at this guy's user page? Except for a few images, the rest are blatant copyvios as he had admitted in the image summary that he had scanned them before uploading for reuse here on Wikipedia. Problem is, how could those supposedly "smart bots" have missed this entirely? Let me know of your opinion, thanks. --Dave1185 (talk) 12:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Dismantling It All

You're the one who deconstructs the heart of the articles created by Wikipedians, correct?! You should feel great and self-assured! How nice it is to be on such a high-horse, isn't it? You ought to be ashamed of both yourself and your reckless actions as you carelessly and callously delete and vandalize the articles of others to make yourself look like a hero in the Wikipedia community. It's people like you that are leading to the downfall of this once semi-reputable site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry that the article about your high school radio station got deleted, but it was not considered notable. If you have an issue with the notability guidelines, you can start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability. ... discospinster talk 14:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Livney

That was a cool way of deleting the article Redirecting it to his user page Awesome :D --Notedgrant (talk) 19:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes it's just easier than dealing with the complaint. :-) ... discospinster talk 19:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Henry Meers

Hi Discospinster, can you restore the revision I made to the above article? The one without the copyright violation. Thanks! Theleftorium 20:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind, it's been deleted now. Theleftorium 20:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Alright, thanks. Can you keep it on your watchlist? I have a feeling the user who created it will come back soon (and I have to leave the computer soon). Theleftorium 20:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Paudash Lake

I tried to clean up this article and have been reverted and called a vandal. I know you have been down that road before with that article -- it's clear to me that the article is inappropriate, but it also seems that the topic is not nearly as important to anyone else as it is to the author(s) of the mess that is there now. Do you have any suggestions? Langhorner (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

You have deleted a Wrong Article!

Hi, I would like to know why you have deleted our article, this article has been created by someone else and also me. We are talking about an young artist that grewed up in Darlington.

Speedy deletion criteria

OK, I'm not really getting this speedy deletion thing, what's the best one for User:Maynassar/Andrei Arshavin? – Michael (talk) 01:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Well I'd drop the categories on that page. I didn't find out that this page was created when I saw it on the Arsenal F.C. players category, and I don't think it should've been created in the first place. – Michael (talk) 02:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


Thanks for taking the time to help User:1Minal1. I am not sure if he/she will appreciate it, but I sure do. Thanks again... ttonyb1 (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

No problem. ... discospinster talk 00:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Nassir Haramein

I don't have a lot of time to discuss or argue with you. I am curious as to why you don't want Nassir Haramein listed in Wikipedia. If you did your homework, you would see that he has been peer-reviewed and has recently won a "best paper" award recognized by many authorities.

There is a lot of recognition given to Mr Haramein and much of what he has done "scientifically" has been acknowledged by individuals like Dr Stephen Hawking and Dr Elizabeth Rauscher.

To suggest that this man is not a "published" and/or highly recognized individual is incorrect and ignorant.

I am not Nassir Haramein - so the "may be an autobiography" claim is completely false.

David Scott eirescott. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eirescott (talkcontribs) 17:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

My hero

Oh DS, you're my deleting-blocking vandalism-squashing hero. :D Rob Banzai (talk) 20:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, I do my best. ... discospinster talk 20:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

What on earth

you saying that dckm world is not of significant importance, it is well known in Scotland !! You know people like you get very annoying on wikipedia !!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrencoutts (talkcontribs) 18:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Phil Browning

Phil Browning is a famous educator and coach from Fluvanna High School. He is considered one of the most famous people from Fluvanna County. Ask any of the residents. Please refrain from deleting this article. The information about Phil Browning in accurate and truthful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uva79 (talkcontribs) 16:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

A mollion dollar paradox

I understand your concerns and respect your decision but I have a few points that you may like to consider before taking a final decision.

This is not a new theory. All the facts can easily be verified from the Wiki's own internal links provided in the article.

In any case, there is no new proposal from the author that have to be published. All the proposals are part of well-established theory as pointed out by Zetawoof.

I have personally read the book, "Nature of Reality' and its not a self-published book.

Zetawoof suggests that position of the sun and the moon are exactly in the same way as the refraction of light.

This exactly is the point author is highlighting. As shown in the Wiki's atmospheric refraction page, there is a difference in the actual position of the sun and its apparent position. The light still must come from actual position of the sun as it can refract only after it enters the atmosphere.

Zetowoof's observationa only supported the arguments of the author.

This is why it is a paradox. One cannot find any logical problem and therefore one does not disagree with the existing theory and yet if the current theory is correct then we have a situation that we cannot have and we do not have in reality.

I have carefully noted the policies of the Wiki and I fail to see how it violates any policy or how it does not meet any of the requirements of the Wiki.

The objection pointed out only supports the paradox.

A paradox is never considered a new theory and therefore cannot be classified as original research. I have read another article of the author on the total solar eclipse and even though observations are mroe significant in that article yet keeping in mind the WIKi policies, it is not proper to include it as it marks new research but the paradox cannot be termed as new or original research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Explorer2909 (talkcontribs) 11:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Z-Clan Deletion

Hi DiscoSpinster You deleted an article I had written with title Z-Clan with the reason A7; which I presume elludes to "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant".

A few examples of Wiki articles that I have found in just a couple of minutes that seem fall well short of A7 are these:

I'm not saying that these should be deleted at all but there seems to be no consistancy. I can't see anything important or significant in any of these where as Z-Clan Own, operate and administer the top ranked gaming servers in the world in their field.

Could you please help me understand what the requirement would be to fullfill this criteria in this instance ?

Many thanks

Carl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosfundango (talkcontribs) 16:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for PAGE_NAME

An editor has asked for a deletion review of PAGE_NAME. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Carlosfundango (talk) 11:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Deletion - A million dollar paradox


Thanks for taking so much time and explaining the reasons in such details. I really appreciate the care being taken by Wiki editors in maintaining fairness.

I fully understand your concerns and accept your decision. I wonder whether you can consider it merging with article on total solar eclipse.

Thanks once again

Explorer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Explorer2909 (talkcontribs) 22:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


Please create the AfD subpage with {{subst:afd2|pg=Z-Clan|cat=G|text=Your reason for deletion}}. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 13:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I was called away for a moment. ... discospinster talk 13:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Article deleted

Why are you deleting my page i just created? If Jay Leno can have a wiki article then why cant I...I will be updating it as I have time..okay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BertramJohnson (talkcontribs)

Straw poll

Are you interested to partcipate in Wikimania 2011 in Montréal? --Mixwell!Talk 01:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Niall Thompson (maths prodigy)

Seeing that you declined the speedy deletion request for this article, I thought I'd tell you that I've PRODed it. I don't agree that the subject is notable and do not think the news report sources establish him as such. Declan Clam (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Schlong Island

I brought up the speedy delete of Schlong Island on WP:RfD. I do not think User:ConcernedVancouverite was acting in good faith. Zweifel (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Alrighty then. ... discospinster talk 14:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

High Five

Search blank check in youtube. 5 minutes and 14 seconds into part 1 is the slick. It is copyrighted material so it cannot be posted onto wikipedia.


Hi Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed a copyvio tag from the Mark Arnold (comic book and animation historian) article because is a copyleft site. However, GFDL-only text can no longer be used on Wikipedia since the switch to dual licensing on June 16 (see Wikipedia:Licensing update). Just thought I'd let you know. :) Regards, Theleftorium 13:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. ... discospinster talk 16:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Taylor Mitchell

Additional information has been added to Taylor Mitchell. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Mitchell. -- Eastmain (talk) 01:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I still don't think she met the notability guidelines while she was alive, and her death doesn't change that. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Cohen for a similar case. ... discospinster talk 01:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


Hey, could you do a little cleanup for me? I had just MfD'd the page User:Runescape right before you deleted it, so could you close the MfD? Thanks, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 22:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

It appears that the discussion has already been closed by User:Tnxman307. I had originally deleted it back in 2008, so I'm a bit late to the party! ... discospinster talk 00:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hmm...ok, cache must not have updated or something...Thanks anyway! Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 00:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Billy wilkins

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Billy wilkins, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy wilkins. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 22:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

All I did was move it to the correct capitalization, but thanks for alerting me. ... discospinster talk 15:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Deleted Cyviz page.

Hi Discospinster,

Sorry to see that on Mach 5th 2009 you deleted the page called Cyviz.

Here's some background information i like to give to you.

Cyviz is a leading manufacturer of premium display walls for collaborative environments. 10 years of R&D and dedicated, sole focus on large displays has given Cyviz a unique understanding of requirements across industries, and the company persistently invest in new display technology to improve its product portfolio.

Although Cyviz is a R&D driven organization, we understand that the complete user experience is more than image quality, new functionality and a productive user interface & invention of new and better hardware for image handling.


For you references, Cyviz is in the same business as Barco_NV.

Can you please undelete the Cyviz page so i can continue to work on it.

Thank you.

Kind Regards K. Morten Haugen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortenhaugen (talkcontribs) 14:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Caleb Chan

Hi I want to start a Caleb Chan (composer) page but it has previously been deleted. What was the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cablechan (talkcontribs) 06:38, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Fire Hose Games

I just wanted to say thanks for dealing so capably and non-BITEingly with the new user who created this article. I found the article due to its speedy tag and decided to implement your suggestion by moving the contents to a sandbox page before I deleted them, copying your useful comments to his talk page. Whether he knows it or not, he got Wikipedia's best available assistance from you. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thank you for the kind comment. ... discospinster talk 01:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)