Jump to content

User talk:FORTEXO

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naya Pakistan Housing & Development Authority (January 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 11:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, FORTEXO! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 11:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Federal Government Employees Housing Authority has been accepted[edit]

Federal Government Employees Housing Authority, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 22:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Interwood Mobel[edit]

Notice

The article Interwood Mobel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company . Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kpgjhpjm 06:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Interwood Mobel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interwood Mobel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interwood Mobel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kpgjhpjm 08:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yunus Brothers Group moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Yunus Brothers Group, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yunus Brothers Group (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Graana.com[edit]

Hello, FORTEXO

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Graana.com for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 07:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Graana.com[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Graana.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 05:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FORTEXO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Emir Saleh

Decline reason:

Your username is only one part of the reason you were blocked; please review the instructions in the block notice before making another request, I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FORTEXO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am neither a paid editor, nor associated with the company that I created the deleted page for. I was blocked for not following the spam policy of Wikipedia, which now I have read and understand. If unblocked, I will not create company or Business Pages.

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. SQLQuery me! 16:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What will you do? 331dot (talk) 10:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not create Company or Business Pages. FORTEXO (talk) 11:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying what you won't do, but not what you will do. If you aren't going to do anything, there is no reason to remove the block. Someone else will review your request, but they will want to know what it is that you intend to do here, not just what you won't do. 331dot (talk) 11:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will add relevant information to Wikipedia pages related to Pakistan. FORTEXO (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FORTEXO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not create Company or Business Pages. I will add relevant information to Wikipedia pages related to Pakistan.

Decline reason:

Proposed edits are vague and don't inspire confidence, declining. signed, Rosguill talk 06:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FORTEXO (talk) 11:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FORTEXO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked because of my user name and creating companies pages, which does not meet the notability requirements of wikipedia. Please unblock and change username to Emir Saleh, further I will update general pages and not create business pages. FORTEXO (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Now a checkuser-block. ST47 (talk) 00:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another administrator has not reviewed your request likely because you are still giving vague generalities. Please describe a specific topic you want to edit about. If you don't have a specific topic you want to edit about right now, I would suggest withdrawing your request until you do. There is no time limit, so you can take as long as you wish to find something to edit. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gujranwala District[edit]

I will edit the Wikipedia Article of Gujranwala District "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gujranwala_District" using the source of "https://www.dawn.com/news/1613809/the-importance-of-gujranwala".

Patwari[edit]

I will create a Wikipedia article about Patwari. Patwari is a government official who keeps records regarding the ownership of land.

I will use the following sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_accountant https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/patwari https://tribune.com.pk/story/1986863/understanding-dying-patwari-culture https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/757443-generation-of-patwaris-made-in-pml-n-govt-lhc https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2019/08/03/punjab-punch-the-power-of-patwari/ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/03/28/the-war-against-the-patwaris/ https://www.dawn.com/news/714502/saying-goodbye-to-patwari-culture https://www.dawn.com/news/1533515/punjab-to-reintroduce-patwari-system-in-province-wide-experiment https://tribune.com.pk/story/1986863/understanding-dying-patwari-culture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haryana_Land_Record_Information_System

Best regards, Dawood FORTEXO (talk) 06:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yunus Brothers Group has been accepted[edit]

Yunus Brothers Group, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mottezen (talk) 08:08, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FORTEXO&oldid=1063031037"