Jump to content

User talk:Faze TK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of al-Watiya Airbase has been accepted

[edit]
Battle of al-Watiya Airbase, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faze TK (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 102.69.10.151. Place any further information here. Unsure as to why I got blocked, does not make any sense to me. If someone could further explain to me why I got blocked that would be greatly appreciated.

Decline reason:

You have edited subsequent to this request, so you are no longer affected by a block. 331dot (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2023

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:Battle of Tarhuna (2019-2020) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Toadette (Happy holiday!) 09:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tarhuna (2019-2020) (December 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Toadette (Happy holiday!) 09:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Faze TK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette (Happy holiday!) 09:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

[edit]

I just created an article titled Battle of Gharyan (2019). I am pretty confident in it but it wouldn't hurt to get some feedback or any suggestions on what I can do better next time. Is it possible that one of you guys could look over the article? Thanks!

-@Faze TK Faze TK (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like feedback on an article, I suggest using the peer review system, where editors can comment on how you can improve on the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article translation

[edit]

I had very recently created this article -> Operation Volcano of Rage. There is also an Arabic translated version of this article, but unfortunately they are not linked together if that makes sense. Is it possible to link both articles together? Faze TK (talk) 21:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Faze TK. They should now be linked. Please double check. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tarhuna (2019-2020) (December 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Bani Walid skirmish moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to 2020 Bani Walid skirmish. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 22:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Yamla (talk) 12:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archive of deleted articles

[edit]

Dear @Yamla:

I've noticed that the five articles I worked hard on have been taken down due to a block on my account. I put a lot of effort into creating them and unfortunately, I don't have a backup of them. I was wondering if it's possible to recover the articles or if I can at least get an archive of the content. The articles in question are:

  1. Misrata Military Council
  2. Battle of Gharyan (2019)
  3. Operation Volcano of Rage
  4. Battle of al-Watiya airbase
  5. 2015 Zintan airstrike attacks

I'd really appreciate your help with this as I spent a lot of time working on these articles. Having an archive of them would mean very much to me. Looking forward to hearing from you soon!

Sincerely, Faze TK Faze TK (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is possible if but only if you are determined not to be a sock of Yousefsw07, despite technical evidence and despite behavioural evidence. --Yamla (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do I prove to you guys that I am not a sock of Yousefsw07? I have contributed nothing but good for this community. I have created multiple very informational and important articles and have never had any previous bans or even warnings. I have never even had an edit reverted by a moderator up until this block. Is there any way I can prove my innocence? @Yamla: Faze TK (talk) 23:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Another admin may choose to give you a copy of the contents without this restriction, though I don't expect that would happen) --Yamla (talk) 22:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archive articles, Admin help

[edit]

Dear admins, I have created multiple articles on Wikipedia that I had spent hours of my time on. Here are a list of those articles: Misrata Military Council Battle of Gharyan (2019) Operation Volcano of Rage Battle of al-Watiya airbase 2015 Zintan airstrike attacks

Unfortunately, my account has been blocked due to a moderator's suspicion of me being a sock (I am currently working this out). This caused my five articles to get deleted. I was wondering if I can receive an archive of the five articles considering that I did not have it saved and that I had spent a lot of time on them. I heard from another admin that it is certainly possible for it to be done. I hope to hear from one of you very soon!

Sincerely, @Faze TK Faze TK (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're successfully unblocked, you can ping me and I'll review the articles for potential undeletion or draftification. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. I will be sure to ping you when the issue is resolved. But in the meantime, is it still not possible to receive a copy of the contents of the articles I had published? Faze TK (talk) 23:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would not do so, and I think it's unlikely any admin would. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a reason why you would not do so or is it policy? Faze TK (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not eager to reward sockpuppetry. I'm also sympathetic to the potential for case of mistaken identity, but we won't know until another CheckUser reviews the evidence. The deleted content isn't going anywhere, so please be patient. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 23:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, thank you for the clarification. Faze TK (talk) 23:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal: Requesting some reconsideration

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Faze TK (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Moderators, Hope you're doing well. I'm reaching out because my account, Faze TK, got blocked recently, and I'm a bit baffled about it. Apparently, there's some suspicion that I'm a sock puppet for @Yousefsw07, but I want to clear the air – we're not connected in any way. I had recently moved to a new area which I then found out that its IP address/range was blocked. I sent in a request for the block on the IP to be reviewed so I can continue my contributions to the community, just for my account to get blocked permanently, under the suspicion that I am a "sock puppet". I've been putting in lots of work to make Wikipedia better. I've created some articles that I think are pretty informative and essential. And honestly, I've never had any issues before – no warnings, no bans, and none of my edits were ever reverted by mods until now. I get that you guys have to keep things in check, but this block caught me off guard. I've always stuck to the rules and guidelines, so I'm not sure what's up. I'm more than happy to chat about any concerns or clear up any confusion. I very politely request you guys to reconsider the block on my account. If there are specific concerns or any "evidence" that led to my block, I am more than willing to address them and provide any necessary clarification. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia and preventing abuse. However, I assure you that I have no connection with any sock puppetry or inappropriate activities. I am committed to continuing my positive contributions to the Wikipedia community and upholding the standards of the platform. Thanks a bunch for your time and help. I hope to hear from you guys very soon.. Sincerely, Faze TK

Decline reason:

Crystal clear technical evidence of  Confirmed socking. Ponyobons mots 01:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed further block evasion as Burhim. I'll go mark the original account as banned due to WP:3X. That should make it easier to throw away all future contributions from this sockpuppeteer. --Yamla (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I am very confused. I have no idea who Burhim is. I promise, I have no correlation with him or any other sock puppeteer. Faze TK (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]