User talk:Arjusreenivas

Welcome!

Hello, Arjusreenivas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joju George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fgnew (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Fgnew! I'm Snowycats. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Snowycats (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Unni Mukundan Films. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Meppadiyan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 12:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will share the reference links. Fgnew (talk) 12:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please make sure you are writing in a neutral tone. Your last few edits have sounded like promotional writing. It is not our job to be free advertisement for films, just neutral inform on the film. BOVINEBOY2008 12:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no. I'm from kerala and i know about this film that's why I'm contributing. Some of the informations in this page is wrong. That's why im adding the true data. Hoping your support. Fgnew (talk) 12:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is again editing the content back. I don't know why. The content they are reverting is wrong information you can search google. Fgnew (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated all the citations Regarding to the content that I've uploaded. And thank you for noticing my contributions. Fgnew (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emcy Joseph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emcy Joseph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emcy Joseph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sonofstar (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I want to know the reason why this article is nominated for deletion. I'm one who follows malayalam film industry and cinemas. So, I decided to create a Wikipedia article for him. His film won state award and many more achievements. After all, He is a director, Screenwriter. You can check the reference links in the article published in top Indian portals. Please do the needful. Fgnew (talk) 09:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Emcy Joseph. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:29, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, But the discussion is closed that's why I deleted the template. Fgnew (talk) 06:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user page was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

You added this notice yourself. The discussion is still open. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okey..When will it get closed? I've waited days. Because I'm one who follows Indian and malayalam film industry. When I try to contribute, why these kinda issues are coming. Anyway hoping to get the discussion closed. Fgnew (talk) 10:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An administrator or established editor will close the discussion when the normal duration (7 days) has expired. If not enough consensus is collected, then it can be extended longer. Most editors have busy lives and Wikipedia doesn't close discussions quickly before interested editors have a chance to comment. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okey Fgnew (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Emcy Joseph, you may be blocked from editing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the deletion discussion is closed and the discussion was to keep. Then why we need to keep the notice there? Fgnew (talk) 10:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sreejith Sarang (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need significant coverage from multiple reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sreejith Sarang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 02:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fgnew! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 02:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anoop John (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anoop John and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 05:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lovefully Yours Veda, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anoop Mohan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anoop Mohan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:47:ADC4:6CEE:D6FF:FE10:823A (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2018 (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 17:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weird userbox

Hi! I noticed that you have a userbox on your user page that says you have extended-confirmed editing privileges, but that is not actually true; see this link. I don't think this violates any rules, but it's a little weird. Is there a reason for this? :) Actualcpscm (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's a mistake . I've removed it. Fgnew (talk) 05:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Actualcpscm. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jude Anthany Joseph, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Actualcpscm (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jude Anthany Joseph. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I got it. I'm updating each every information with reliable sources once again. Fgnew (talk) 05:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And i will not modify controversy section, I will do it when I get proper source. Thank you. Fgnew (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sreejith Sarang

Hello, Fgnew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sreejith Sarang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anoop John

Hello, Fgnew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anoop John, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anoop John

Hello, Fgnew. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anoop John".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited LLB: Life Line of Bachelors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asif Ali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Life Line of Bachelors Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Life Line of Bachelors Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Sadasivan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rahul Sadasivan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing pending film tags for articles.

You have recently removed pending film tags from multiple articles like Naslen K. Gafoor. Pending film tags are used to denote that film hasn't released yet. So don't remove that tag until the film is released.

Thank you, Aadirulez8 (talk) 10:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, It was accidental. Feel free to revert. Arjusreenivas (talk) 10:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Pani (2024 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pani (2024 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pani (film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pani (film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BOVINEBOY2008 18:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's completely fine. But it will show as a deleted article on my articles created page, right? I'm the one who wrote the article on Pani (film). So it's completely fine if you restore that article there. I created a separate article because it had a redirection. Thank you. Arjusreenivas (talk) 04:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daveed (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daveed (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Unreleased films don't get articles, per WP:NFF. Work on the article in draft space until it has been released. I advise good copyediting. The film can't have been "announced on November 23, 2024". Remove WP:PEACOCK terms such as "renowned" cinematographer.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm really sorry I didn't notice that I wrote 2024 instead of 2023. Please let me know if there are any updates. The release date of the film has already been announced, and I usually create wikis for movies with confirmed release dates. Please advise on how I can proceed. Also, I was unsure whether to use the word "renowned," which is why I used it. Could you help me fix these issues? Thanks! Please go through reference links if you have any doubts.

Regards,

Arjun Arjusreenivas (talk) 16:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am only seeing this now because you didn't ping me. Why have you moved this back to main article space? There is nothing unclear about WP:NFF - to repeat: Unreleased films don't get articles, per WP:NFF. Work on the article in draft space until it has been released. The film is not being released until January 2025, and so should not be in main article space. Please move it back to draft space until it has actually been released. I usually create wikis for movies with confirmed release dates. - please don't. This is a breach of WP:NFF. In general, films get a wiki article after they have been released, not before.

I was unsure whether to use the word "renowned," which is why I used it. We should not use WP:PEACOCK terms in Wikipedia's voice. If someone else describes someone or something as renowned, we can quote them, if it is WP:DUE for inclusion. Hope this helps. Please continue your good work on Wikipedia, but do please read up on the policies and pay heed when someone draws your attention to them. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boby Chemmanur (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boby Chemmanur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daveed (2025 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daveed (2025 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daveed (2025 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]