User talk:Funkyuggla

Welcome!

Hi Funkyuggla! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 10:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Przanowski moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Edward Przanowski. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and better referencing to support the article contents. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Vang-Jensen

A tag has been placed on Frank Vang-Jensen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Theodor Engwall moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Victor Theodor Engwall. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it needs more citations to support the article contents. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Theodor Engwall (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the content is unreferenced – where is all this information coming from? Primary sources, esp. ones that are close to the subject, do not establish notability per WP:GNG. It looks like the only source that may contribute towards GNG is the Arbetarbladet piece, but it alone isn't enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victor Theodor Engwall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Funkyuggla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Theodor Engwall (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

too many quotes and too many adjectives.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victor Theodor Engwall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Emil Engwall. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Funkyuggla. Thank you for your work on Emil Engwall. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Funkyuggla. Thank you for your work on Inger Marianne Helin. User:Edward-Woodrow, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Good work, article looks fairly good.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Edward-Woodrow}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 12:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hello, just to let you know, when you create a page, remember to add a short description. These can be made by adding the {{Short description}} template while editing, or by activating the ShortDesc helper gadget in your preferences. Happy editing, Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 13:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mona Przanowska

The article Mona Przanowska has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hqb (talk) 14:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi Funkyuggla! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Mona Perzanowska did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mona Przanowska for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mona Przanowska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mona Przanowska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kleuske (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and WP:BLP

The two articles I have examined, are extremely poorly sourced. In fact all the sources I have tried to check are either inaccessible or simply do not mention the subject of the article. This is not acceptable, since both persons are still alive. (WP:BLP) One I have already AfD'd, and tagged Greger Helin, since it's late and I don't want to do a WP:BEFORE at this time. I strongly urge you to read WP:BLP and WP:V and stick to them.

Also, and this because your single minded devotion to these particular families, I must ask whether or not you are in some way connected to them and thus have a conflict of interest. Kleuske (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 10:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should definitely attend to this since it is about your editing and concerns about articles you've created. The specific thread is:

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Funkyuggla

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Essenafzillie. This is important -- you can be banned from editing if you use two accounts (there are a few allowable exceptions but I don't think they apply in your case). You will need to pick one account and stick to it. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 13:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Funkyuggla. I don't see any progress on the assurances you made in this talk thread, on July 12 about your apparent sockpuppetry. Can you explain why an administrator shouldn't block your Essenafzillie account? You could then log in to the User:Funkyuggla account from both of your devices. Your rationale for needing two accounts doesn't make sense. ("They serve different purposes and are used separately depending on the device I'm using"). EdJohnston (talk) 18:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Björn Engwall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Björn Engwall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Björn Engwall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kleuske (talk) 10:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kenny Lövingsson

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kenny Lövingsson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi Funkyuggla! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. I notice above that you've had this pointed out to you before, so please stop using "minor edit" for anything that isn't minor. Tomas e (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Vang-Jensen

Hello, Funkyuggla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Vang-Jensen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Theodor Engwall

Hello, Funkyuggla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Theodor Engwall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Theodor Engwall

Hello, Funkyuggla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theodor Engwall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]