User talk:GaryReggae

Prize Bingo

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. B1atv 21:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:306385942c1c07dc74domp7.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:306385942c1c07dc74domp7.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:306385942c1c07dc74domp7.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:306385942c1c07dc74domp7.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Excelscreenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Excelscreenshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Indians In Moscow

An article that you have been involved in editing, Indians In Moscow, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indians In Moscow. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 04:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of East Street Shopping Centre

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on East Street Shopping Centre, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because East Street Shopping Centre seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting East Street Shopping Centre, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, GaryReggae! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! waggers (talk) 09:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Eastleigh

Looks pretty spammy to me, full of unsourced puffs, and there are no independent verifiable sources either for your claims or to show that this centre it meets the notability guidelines. Examples of unreferenced claims:

The shopping centre revolutionised the retail offering of the railway town
It was also famous for its extravagant Christmas grottos and huge Christmas
Commercial success...The Swan Centre has been largely successful commercially. Most of the units on the ground floor are snapped up very quickly

The only source you give is the official website. The point of speedy deletion is that it allows non-neutral and non-notable articles to be deleted without lengthy consultation. If you want to improve it, I'll put the text here shortly jimfbleak (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Swan Shopping Centre Eastleigh

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Swan Shopping Centre Eastleigh, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory; there is nothing to suggest that this shopping centre is notable enough for an encyclopedia article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnCD (talk) 15:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gary, I've retrieved much of the content of this article and added it to the Eastleigh article. I'll look at doing similar with the Southampton shopping centre articles you wrote - we could do with that information in the Southampton City Centre article. Some references would be really useful though, if you can provide any. Let me know if you need any help. Cheers, waggers (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on shopping centres

Hi. Before you put too much effort into making articles about shopping centres, I should warn you that, although there is no specific policy about them, many such articles about small centres have not survived a challenge on grounds of not being notable enough for an article in an encyclopedia. Some guidelines you might like to look at:

and this as an example of a deletion discussion. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eastleigh

It's already tagged again for speedy deletion. I'll leave it to someone else, but you really will have to address the notability and referencing issues, or it will keep happening jimfbleak (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I'll try and sort some sources out; if it does get deleted again I think I'll just put the info into the article on Eastleigh itself.GaryReggae (talk) 15:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of East Street Shopping Centre

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article East Street Shopping Centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 06:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deck access

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deck access, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

wikipedia is not a dictionary

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad it was kept, but I've now proposed that it be merged into Streets in the sky. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, GaryReggae, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! SteveBot (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

process camera

Hi! Please make your pictures smaller and don't forget to add reliable sources. Thanks and happy editing. Unioneagle (talk) 22:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Brooks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 16:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epaderm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epaderm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epaderm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GamerPro64 02:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]