User talk:Hazelfo/hazelfoarchive1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Hazelfo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nothing to see here.
Image copyright problem with Image:Sacrumtorch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sacrumtorch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Ok, this is getting strange
Yep, I have a wiki account too Ctrl build 00:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Go_team_venture_barnstar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Go_team_venture_barnstar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 14:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Jackson_publick.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jackson_publick.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 15:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
New York City Meetup
|
New York City Meetup
|
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there! --Pharos 19:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
...to the next New York City Meetup!
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
New mailing list
There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
You are invited!
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).
Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).
We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: You are invited!
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).
We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Sacrum Torch
I have put the article Sacrum Torch up for deletion. There is a tag on the article that links to the discussion regarding this proposal. Let me know if you have any questions. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
You're invited!
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).
We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: You're invited!
|
New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza
|
Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.
There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
You're invited!
|
New York City Meetup |
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
You're invited...
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
You're invited...
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference New York, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Takes Manhattan and Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Wikis Take Manhattan
|
|
WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City.
LAST YEAR'S EVENT
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Fall 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
- Commons:Wikis Take Manhattan (our cool team galleries)
- Streetfilms: Wikis Take Manhattan (our awesome video)
WINNINGS? The first prize winning team members will get Eye-Fi Share cards, which automatically upload photos from your camera to your computer and to sites like Flickr. And there will also be cool prizes for other top scorers.
WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, October 10th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.
WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!
REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.
WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's fantastic new event space nestled between Chinatown and SoHo. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:
- 148 Lafayette Street
- between Grand & Howard Streets
FOR UPDATES
Please watchlist Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan. This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.
Thanks,
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
You're invited!
|
New York City Meetup |
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day NYC
You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 9th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Sunday January 24, 2010 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22
|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Introducing errors into The Prestige (film)
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 23:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, passive aggression is always welcome. Hazelfo (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. There is nothing "passive aggressive" about it. Viriditas (talk) 10:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, and watch the film is a valid, published source. I thought I was correct. I see now that I'm not. I wasn't vandalizing any page or providing invalid sources. Hazelfo (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it isn't a valid source for disputed content. That's why we rely on secondary sources. The film is a primary source. Here's the thing: Why would Borden risk getting caught trying to figure out Angier's secret if he already knew it? See? Your theory doesn't make sense. Viriditas (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Because he didn't think that Angier would have the nerve to keep killing the duplicates? I don't know. I still think it's too much of a coincidence for Borden to write an entire diary cipher based on the name 'Tesla' and claim the key to his secret is 'Tesla' when Tesla does in fact have a duplicating machine. Hazelfo (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Borden never knew about the trick, and he never understood how Angier did it. That's why he stole away backstage to check, but Angier knew and set him up for the murder of his double. As for the cipher, Borden attended the UK exhibition along with Angier, so they were both introduced to Tesla's work. The reason Borden used Tesla as a cipher is because Borden is just like Tesla, natural in their skill, but poor in marketing their work. Cutter explains this right after Angier sees Borden's new act with his twin for the first time. Cutter sees right through it, explaining to Angier that it's a dobule, but Angier refuses to believe it. Same thing when Borden and Angier went to see the Chinese magician. Borden figured out the trick immediately, but Angier couldn't wrap his mind around it. Hazelfo, you are confusing the thematic parallels between characters with narrative and plot. Borden and Fallon are natural twins; They don't know Tesla. Angier is convinced, like you, that Borden does, but he's constantly misleading himself throughout the film. Even though Angier thinks Tesla has made the machine before, Tesla says he didn't, and even his assistant says the same thing. But, like you, Angier doesn't listen. You keep missing out on the natural ability of Borden vs. the Angier the performer. The fact that the twins are natural is embedded in the story, and is adapted from the book. Do you understand? Borden and Fallon do not rely on any technology or performance gimmicks to accomplish their illusions. However, that is exactly what Angier relies upon. Understand? Viriditas (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, are you actually comparing me to a fictional character because I moderately disagree with you? Nevermind that I already admitted that I was wrong, right? And clearly because I moderately disagree with you - or at least entertain the idea of a different theory - I just didn't watch or pay attention to the film. I didn't miss anything, and I don't need you to explain the film to me. I watched it too. Just because you're the film's wikipedia page watchdog doesn't give you license to be a presumptuous, condescending jerk. Stop it. Hazelfo (talk) 12:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, on the article talk page you are still insisting that "nothing you've pointed out disrupts the possibility that Borden was duplicated", which is utter bunk. Viriditas (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh no, someone is wrong on the internet, better be a jerk about it and quick, before your reputation is ruined. Hazelfo (talk) 12:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think it is pretty obvious who is being a "jerk". Viriditas (talk) 13:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- So do I. The examples you gave were pretty poor for your argument, and your methods are rude and condescending - I've since watched the film again and come to my own conclusions. Again, if you had politely explained why I was wrong this wouldn't have cluttered either talk page. Hazelfo (talk) 13:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're very confused. You called a template warning "passive aggressive" and a polite explanation about your edits, "rude and condescending". Seriously, take a break. Viriditas (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're confused if you actually think you were being polite, or that you're being polite now. It is also fairly passive aggressive to tell someone to have sources for a description of a film's plot and to call them a vandal for reverting one edit. Hazelfo (talk) 13:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- A little bit of a "clue" for you, friend: A template message cannot be "passive aggressive". It was merely warning you of your poor behavior and informing you how to correct it. Since you have completely failed to understand why you need a sources for an interpretation of a film's plot that deviates from those found in reliable sources, you may require a larger clue stick to be applied in the future. Consider this a warning. Good day. Viriditas (talk) 13:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, and I'm the jerk? Seriously, give it up and get off my talk page. Good day to you and your completely unenforceable "warning". Troll. So much for the rules, huh? Hazelfo (talk) 13:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- A little bit of a "clue" for you, friend: A template message cannot be "passive aggressive". It was merely warning you of your poor behavior and informing you how to correct it. Since you have completely failed to understand why you need a sources for an interpretation of a film's plot that deviates from those found in reliable sources, you may require a larger clue stick to be applied in the future. Consider this a warning. Good day. Viriditas (talk) 13:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're confused if you actually think you were being polite, or that you're being polite now. It is also fairly passive aggressive to tell someone to have sources for a description of a film's plot and to call them a vandal for reverting one edit. Hazelfo (talk) 13:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're very confused. You called a template warning "passive aggressive" and a polite explanation about your edits, "rude and condescending". Seriously, take a break. Viriditas (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- So do I. The examples you gave were pretty poor for your argument, and your methods are rude and condescending - I've since watched the film again and come to my own conclusions. Again, if you had politely explained why I was wrong this wouldn't have cluttered either talk page. Hazelfo (talk) 13:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think it is pretty obvious who is being a "jerk". Viriditas (talk) 13:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh no, someone is wrong on the internet, better be a jerk about it and quick, before your reputation is ruined. Hazelfo (talk) 12:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, on the article talk page you are still insisting that "nothing you've pointed out disrupts the possibility that Borden was duplicated", which is utter bunk. Viriditas (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Wow, are you actually comparing me to a fictional character because I moderately disagree with you? Nevermind that I already admitted that I was wrong, right? And clearly because I moderately disagree with you - or at least entertain the idea of a different theory - I just didn't watch or pay attention to the film. I didn't miss anything, and I don't need you to explain the film to me. I watched it too. Just because you're the film's wikipedia page watchdog doesn't give you license to be a presumptuous, condescending jerk. Stop it. Hazelfo (talk) 12:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Borden never knew about the trick, and he never understood how Angier did it. That's why he stole away backstage to check, but Angier knew and set him up for the murder of his double. As for the cipher, Borden attended the UK exhibition along with Angier, so they were both introduced to Tesla's work. The reason Borden used Tesla as a cipher is because Borden is just like Tesla, natural in their skill, but poor in marketing their work. Cutter explains this right after Angier sees Borden's new act with his twin for the first time. Cutter sees right through it, explaining to Angier that it's a dobule, but Angier refuses to believe it. Same thing when Borden and Angier went to see the Chinese magician. Borden figured out the trick immediately, but Angier couldn't wrap his mind around it. Hazelfo, you are confusing the thematic parallels between characters with narrative and plot. Borden and Fallon are natural twins; They don't know Tesla. Angier is convinced, like you, that Borden does, but he's constantly misleading himself throughout the film. Even though Angier thinks Tesla has made the machine before, Tesla says he didn't, and even his assistant says the same thing. But, like you, Angier doesn't listen. You keep missing out on the natural ability of Borden vs. the Angier the performer. The fact that the twins are natural is embedded in the story, and is adapted from the book. Do you understand? Borden and Fallon do not rely on any technology or performance gimmicks to accomplish their illusions. However, that is exactly what Angier relies upon. Understand? Viriditas (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Because he didn't think that Angier would have the nerve to keep killing the duplicates? I don't know. I still think it's too much of a coincidence for Borden to write an entire diary cipher based on the name 'Tesla' and claim the key to his secret is 'Tesla' when Tesla does in fact have a duplicating machine. Hazelfo (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it isn't a valid source for disputed content. That's why we rely on secondary sources. The film is a primary source. Here's the thing: Why would Borden risk getting caught trying to figure out Angier's secret if he already knew it? See? Your theory doesn't make sense. Viriditas (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, and watch the film is a valid, published source. I thought I was correct. I see now that I'm not. I wasn't vandalizing any page or providing invalid sources. Hazelfo (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. There is nothing "passive aggressive" about it. Viriditas (talk) 10:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Hazelfo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |