User talk:Herman79

Image tagging for Image:200px-Upgrade U.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Upgrade U.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Michelle McCool

Please don't add information that did not already happen. Michelle hasn't won the Divas Championship yet and Michelle hasn't even been placed in the match yet! A new champion will be crowned at Night of Champions. Please don't add info that hasn't happened again. --CJ Sheldon3 (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Total Nonstop Action Wrestling

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Total Nonstop Action Wrestling, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Aaru Bui ^DII 08:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary page moving

Please avoid moving pages to different names and then changing the content to be about a completely different subject. You did this with Monique love to Princess vs. Dutchess to Neveah Crawford to Francia Almendarez. If you intend to write about a completely different subject, then please start a new article instead (if the old article is no longer useful, then it can be nominated for deletion). Otherwise the edit histories of all of the articles get mixed together. -- Bovineone 04:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Almendarez

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Herman Almendarez, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ... discospinster _talk 14:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Picture This (film). Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiptoety 04:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Picture This! (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

non-notable video, author probably trying to get around speedy delete on Picture This (film)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Katherine Tredwell 04:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Meegan Samantha Coleman

The article Meegan Samantha Coleman has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Fuhghettaboutit 12:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Ashley?

Can you provide a source proving this is a real show? WAVY 10 Fan 13:06, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lucky Ashley. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 12:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pasiones Del Amor

Pasiones Del Amor, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pasiones Del Amor satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasiones Del Amor and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Pasiones Del Amor during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Roucka

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Roucka, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ovwrestling.com/Superstars/Divas/roucka.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Desde Entonces - real telenovela?

You've just created a page about a telenovela called Desde Entonces, but you classify it as a "2009 Telenovela". This seems too far out to be worth having a page about, you can probably get it speedily deleted yourself, as you are the only author. Also you point to esmas.com as the official website, but it appears to have no reference at all to a telenovela called "Desde Entonces". Please consider going through the speedy deletion process yourself, or adding more details to prove its existence, like a better link to the offical website. Ttwaring 20:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to edit other pages but you haven't done anything about Desde Entonces, despite it being labeled as a possible hoax. If you do not believe the page should stay in wikipedia then you can just blank it (WP:CSD#G7) and it will be deleted, because you are the author. Put something like "I am the author - please speedily delete this page" in the edit summary. If it is a genuine telenovela and there is some reason for keeping the page then please make some kind of respionse to show you are not wasting the time of other editors. Ttwaring (talk) 22:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Desde Entonces

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Desde Entonces, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Desde Entonces. Shunpiker (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caprichosas

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Caprichosas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mean Girls 2

A tag has been placed on Mean Girls 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Mean Girls 2 is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Mean Girls 2 saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Gprince007 (talk) 11:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WrestleMania XXIV

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 01:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corazon Rebelde - real telenovela?

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Corazon Rebelde, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. This is the fourth telenovela page you have created, along with Desde Entonces, Pasiones Del Amor and Caprichosas. Please do not continue to add unsourced and unverifiable pages. Ttwaring (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

America's Next Top Model

Although who you insert as the winner may be true, there is no way it can be verified until after the episode airs (that is, after 8pm Eastern Standard Time). Thus, the information should not be inserted. SKS2K6 (talk) 19:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)==Image copyright problem with Image:Cw-antm10-whitney-container 010635-96835c-500x354.jpg==[reply]

Image Copyright problem

Hi Herman79!
We thank you for uploading Image:Cw-antm10-whitney-container 010635-96835c-500x354.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 01:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Neidhart's new theme

You listed her theme as a production track called 'pretty cool'can you tell me where you found this info to verify this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.161.243 (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on WWE Roster

Your edits to WWE Roster have been removed as considered vandalism due to names of females clearly not on the WWE roster being added. Also this was done in multiple steps to gain edit counts. This is your second warning for vandalism and you will be blocked from editing after a third. Please consider being a contributing member of this wiki. Happy Editing. JakeDHS07 19:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Evidence seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_World_Wrestling_Entertainment_employees&action=history JakeDHS07 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wrestlicious

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wrestlicious, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

lacks references, no indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 03:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wrestlicious

I have nominated Wrestlicious, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestlicious. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scjessey (talk) 05:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melissa Martinez

The article Melissa Martinez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established. Didn't win Rock of Love and just signing a contract (if she even did), isn't sufficient for notability, as many people sign with WWE and never debut.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 20:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Angela Fong

I have nominated Angela Fong, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Fong. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. iMatthew ^talk at 22:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"LISETTE MORELOS" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LISETTE MORELOS. Since you had some involvement with the LISETTE MORELOS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]