User talk:Ii ShOrtBOi ii

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination of Of Mice And Magic for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Of Mice And Magic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of Mice And Magic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar 04:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparison of scientists and engineers[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Comparison of scientists and engineers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced essay

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LadyofShalott 20:30, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Basil L Plumley[edit]

Please stop making unreferenced alterations to the above article, without any explanation. This is your third revision which is considered to be edit warring. If you continue you may be blocked from editing. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

As Mr. Johnson notes, you need to ahve material in the article that supports your additions: infobox content must be referenced, or a reference must exist in the article. Please use the article talkpage to discuss proposed changes, and please remember to log in. Acroterion (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Once again, you are adding material to this article without any supporting references or sources. Your material has been reverted as unsourced. Please stop adding unsourced material or you may be blocked from editing. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Metallica[edit]

All three of your edits to the album articles are self-directs from articles that don't exist. Reverted. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 02:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

January 2016[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Clash, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Robvanvee 10:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm McGeddon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Generation X, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Thrash metal, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Traditional heavy metal. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Ii ShOrtBOi ii. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Ii ShOrtBOi ii. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)