User talk:Itai

Archives: 1, 2.

This is my talk page (hence User talk:Itai). Comments are always welcome, cash transfers equally so (comments accompanied by cash transfers are likely to be answered sooner). Comments should go at the bottom, money to my Swiss bank account. I may reply either here or in your talk pages; if you prefer one over the other, say so. — Itai (talk) 18:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli Wikipedians

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Israel page as living in or being associated with Israel. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Israeli Wikipedians for instructions. —Simetrical (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy changes by Gilgamesh

Unfortunately, User:Gilgamesh is now imposing his own views by changing the transliterated Hebrew names of articles with redirects to unreadable Hebrew names and fonts, as if his criteria are the only ones to reckon with, when there are in fact several. My computer, as I am sure many others' as well, does not pick up his type of fonts, and thus he is messing up articles such as Safed, Hadera, Holon, Afula, Arad, Israel and many others defacing them and making them unreadable on the web. He is going to DESTROY the normal usage of Wikipedia's Hebrew transliterations to satisfy his own needs without there being any consensus. Common usages are being thrown out in favor of obscure and pedantic academic usages familiar to only a handful of unkown academics. He should be called upon to stop BEFORE he rushes to do further damage without any consensus being reached. All his changes should therefore be reverted. See all his recent contributions via: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gilgamesh I thank you for your interest, and urge all readers here to act. IZAK 04:01, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew naming conventions

At the present time there is a serious discussion taking place, aiming at some consensus that will result in "official" Wikipedia guidelines about how Hebrew should be used and written in Wikipedia articles. Because of your past or ongoing interest in these type of articles with Hebrew words in them, your attention is called to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Hebrew) [1] TO MAKE YOUR VIEWS KNOWN AND TO ADD TO THE DISCUSSION BEFORE THE "DOORS ARE SHUT" PLEASE SEE THE RELATED DISCUSSION PAGE AT Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew) [2] Thank you! IZAK 04:01, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Places in Cuba

Is about to be voted for deletion. Just for you to know.--Jondel 04:50, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine origins of the veil

Hi, I have no idea if this is acceptable usage of this space or not, if it isn't I'm terribly sorry. Would you be able to give me the source for the idea that the veil in Islamic culture came from Byzantium? Thanks. You can email me at bridget.whittle@utoronto.ca

Castaways

Hi Itai. I see you read the Straight Dope article about castaways (you listed two of them on your TODO page). Just thought I'd give you a heads-up about the work I've done at castaway. violet/riga (t) 18:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Shinkolobwe

Hey, Itai. You are very welcome; I thought that the French article was significant too, and am glad if I helped. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 00:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

Re: John von Neumann

Itai, how can you justify removing from the John von Neumann article the cellular automata category reference, when it is von Neumann who invented the concept? William R. Buckley 07:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Itai, your suggestion is not too bad, actually. I would want to include some kind of reference within the article proper, however. Of course, the text of this comment comes without an in-depth analysis of your reasoning, so perhaps I am missing some detail of your reasoning. What I find most palatable is the notion of working together, and in this respect, you will find no complaint from me. So, give me a little more time to review the justification you gave on my user talk page. Once I am sure of your intent, I will make a starting effort at the change you suggest, and notify you of my start on your talk page. That will facilitate synchronisation of our efforts. By the way, send me email at the address given on my talk page. I would like to know the identity of those with whom I correspond, etc. William R. Buckley 06:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

de:Regierungserklärung

I have translated this at Government policy statement. --Malthusian (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eras of the Halakha

Nice job. I was thinking about doing that myself but I never got around to it. Jon513 21:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P2Pedia

I'm interested in creating a concept for a P2Pedia mentioned by you at Meta-Wiki. I have the technical knowledge in implementation and I want to ask if their are allready a project running cause P2Pedia was first mentioned 2004. Maybe you know some more about the discussions after 2004? --BertLE

Wow. That was some time ago. I've completely forgotten about P2Pedia. I am aware of no project running, nor of further discussions. I'm glad you find the concept interesting. If you're really interested, I'd be happy to collaborate with you in starting such a project. — Itai (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad of that. I will put my thoughts into some(many) headwords, or something like this. I allready started a little text today, but there is a lot to do. I will put all to the p2p-page at meta wiki[3] maybe tomorrow. Later I also want to contact the developer communities of some p2p-clients, but this after writing the first draft of P2Pedia. --BertLE

Komemeiut

Komemeiut is not "standing straight" but "to rise of the ashes" Zeq 17:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jean-Jacques Dony.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jean-Jacques Dony.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 05:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Itai,

Sinking of RMS Leinster

There seems to be a conflict of information regarding the U-123 (or is it the UB-123?) and the sinking of the RMS Leinster (see my Wikipedia article 'RMS Leinster').

You claim that the U-123 under the command of Karl Thouret sank the Leinster and ended her days being run aground on the east coast of Britain in 1921.

All sources regarding the sinking of the Leinster say that she was sunk by the U (or UB?) -123 under the command of Robert Ramm and that this u-boat did not manage to survive for long after doing so but fell foul of the North Sea barrage and sunk before the war ended when returning to her base at Zeebrugge.

What is the source, etc., that you have on the boat that sunk the Leinster and what is your view of this contradiction. Can you respond to this query on my talk page, if possible.

Looking forward to your response,

Oz MH 22:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Itai Doesn't Want People To Know

This user is a cannibal.

The adjacent box reveals what Itai doesn't want people to know about himself. Incidentally, we have actually edited at least one article in common. I edited the Usenet article (anonymously) twice on 8 March 2006 which you had edited once on 7 February that same year.

(As I said in email, you are most welcome to visit my userpage any time you wish. Zerrakhi 13:55, 13 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I made a slightly cheeky edit recently. I changed the template that says, "This Australian government-related article is a stub" so that it now features a picture of a galah - a bird culturally associated with stupidity. In so doing I vastly improved upon the previous picture, which nobody could possibly tell what it was without clicking on it. Zerrakhi 15:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and it took a total of 51 hours 20 minutes before someone changed it back! Ah, that was fun while it lasted. Zerrakhi 12:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ToDo and HACTRN

Hope you don't mind my poaching, but I took the liberty of redirecting the [[HACTRN]] article to DDT, which my reading of the notes to Steele's The HACTRN indicates HACTRN was a special case of. (I noticed it was on your TODO list). -- Gwern (contribs) 03:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

papal bull article

I don't mind at all. You should probably re-direct though, and I'll put that down on the page: the article I made is pretty much just word for word from Nuttall, as I worked sporadically on that project. --KharBevNor 17:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What to do...

Aha! That explains it. I was wondering why the answer wasn't more Kafkaesque. :-) Cheers, FreplySpang 23:43, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

International English grammar

About your edit in Klingon language, from (a) "Paramount Pictures owns the copyright" to (b) "Paramount Pictures own the copyright": (a) is correct in American usage: "Paramount Pictures", though a plural formation, is the name of a singular legal entity, a corporation, and therefore takes a singular verb. (b) is correct in British usage: collective nouns (even if singular) take plural verbs, e.g. "the public say..." rather than "the public says...". So in effect you have edited correct American English grammar into correct British English grammar. Another person might with equal validity make the opposite edit. Is there a Wikipedia policy on which grammar should apply in this case? Wikipedia's international; the Klingon language is used internationally; Paramount's products are marketed internationally; but the company itself is headquartered in the USA. Should any of these facts be considerations, or should one grammar be "standard" across the board? -- SAJordan 16:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC) (please reply wherever convenient to you)[reply]

User:Itai

Hi Itai: You have not enabled your Wikipedia Email feature in your "my preferences" at the top of your user page. Sometimes editors overlook that when it's a useful way of staying in touch with other editors. Best wishes. IZAK 03:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Translation

Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Translators available.

This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.

If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage (while changing, of course, the codes according to the languages you speak):

   {{Translator|es|Spanish}} 
   {{Proofreader|fr|French}}

We hope to see you soon on Wikipedia:Translation!

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 02:50 3 January 2007 (UTC).

CIO

I notice you contributed most of the content of the CIO article.

I wonder if you could confirm your sources for CIO standing for Central Intelligence Organisation. I have seen an Ian Smith quote refering to it as the Criminal Investigation Organisation, so would like to verify.

N-edits 22:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T'would be best if you did this

Hi!

Re: Template_talk:Threeagesystem (edit talk links history) and Template:Threeagesystem(edit talk links history)

Request you agree with this administrative nicety and move this yourself. It'd be more appropriate given it's age. Just make sure to tag the redirect with {{R from template|Newname}} and no articles will need changed since a redirect template works just fine.

I added some appropriate cats and fixed up the format some little bit. I'm in the middle of nesting that within a three column table on one page.

We probably ought to tack this in on the bottom of most things listed in the last link of the template. T'was a good idea! Kudos and Cheers! // FrankB 16:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parkman

Thank you; I appreciate it. However, the lack of inline references and other problems mean it will most likely fail to pass this time around. Biruitorul 21:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parkman-Webster murder case FAC

Hi, all you do to withdraw a nomination is remove it from the main page and remove the fanfare from the talk page. On the second go-around, just archive this nomination and make sure you link to it. You don't have to note that you did this in the {{ArticleHistory}} of the talk page. ALTON .ıl 21:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Realms_of_the_Dwarves_of_Middle-earth.svg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Realms_of_the_Dwarves_of_Middle-earth.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 17:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albigensian Crusade

I'm contacting you out of courtesy as you have contributed to the page and may wish to supply your own citations. If you feel this doesn't matter to you, please ignore it. This page was rated as a Good Article, but has been downgraded because nobody did the donkeywork of listing the attributions to the various statements provided, which is after all a fairly serious dereliction of duty in what's suppoed to be a historical record.

Having discussed the withdrawal of GA with LuciferMorgan, I give notice that I am sitting down with the three classic original source texts (Puylaurens, Vaux-de-Cernay and de Tudèle - the last in the Livre de Poche edition as the Martin-Chabot is long out of print) to add the missing inline citations to this page. I do not intend at this point to make any textual alterations, but if comments are made which are NOT justified, be prepared to state your sources now. Jel 20:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Oysterband

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Oysterband, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Oysterband has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Oysterband, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 10:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Interzonal Traffic

Hi Itai. You put Interzonal Traffic on the translation list and I have had a go at translating it. However, I found some specific terms a bit tricky so it really needs to be proofread. However, I just can't work out where to update the progress to proofreaders needed. Sorry to ask a stupid question but I am new and I notice that you have translated articles from Hebrew. Any chance you could let me know how to update this. Thanks Billy1968 (talk) 02:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks Itai. I really appreciate you putting the links in for me. Please could you tell me how to do this (or maybe a link to a page where this is explained) so that I don't leave the job half done next time. Thanks Billy1968 (talk) 03:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alt.sex

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alt.sex, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Alt.sex. Skomorokh ^incite 16:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Robots text screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Robots text screenshot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Battle of Vicksburg

A tag has been placed on Template:Battle of Vicksburg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

victor w coules

I have info on painter victor w coules

Rhonda Hayes roonsgarden@hotmail.com12.186.246.2 (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)roonsgarden[reply]

User page

Hello Itai,

I found this phrase on your user page: "Ich hörte im Fußboden, ich fiel im Stuhl!". Can you please tell me where is this phrase taken from, and what does it mean?

Thanks, Leptons (talk) 21:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:O-yatoi gaikokujin

Category:O-yatoi gaikokujin, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 15:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Kellner

I just sent you an email, but in case it does not get through to you, I thought I should write to you here, as well. I am hoping you can help me with the Friedrich Kellner article, to translate it into Hebrew. I have a condensed version of the article that I can send to you (about 1500 words). Thank you, Scott Rskellner (talk) 21:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SUL req @ zh wiki

Hi, your SUL request @ zh wiki is approved. --Mywood (talk) 12:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! — Itai (talk) 13:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:OECD

File:Belgium employment.xcf listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Belgium employment.xcf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 20:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikisource

Template:Wikisource has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Dear User:Itai, I would like to ask you if you kindly agree to translate the article Israel Tsvaygenbaum from English to Hebrew. Thank you. Sincerely, Boxes12 (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Books of Torah

Template:Books of Torah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Generally accepted accounting principles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Generally accepted accounting principles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generally accepted accounting principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PanchoS (talk) 09:11, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Itai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Itai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Elizabeth of England listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen Elizabeth of England. Since you had some involvement with the Queen Elizabeth of England redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé –selbert 23:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Confederate States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Confederate States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Itai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Arda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Arda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Arda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Realms of Arda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Realms of Arda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realms of Arda (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BenKuykendall (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Titanic prime

The article Titanic prime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No mathematical or other significance for this arbitrary definition; no meaningful coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBL (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rana temporaria temporaria

Proposed deletion of Rana temporaria temporaria

The article Rana temporaria temporaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Should this page be merged into the 'Rana temporaria' article? It seems to duplicate a lot of the same information. It's just the European subspecies of that frog

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fourdots2 (talk) 09:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Storyline (TV series)

The article Storyline (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NTV – Stood ref-less for 3 years. Could not find secondary sources. Tone is strongly WP:PROMO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rulers of Ethiopia has been nominated for renaming

Category:Rulers of Ethiopia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Wikisource author

Template:Wikisource author has been nominated for merging with Template:Wikisource. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monarchs of Ethiopia has been nominated for renaming

Category:Monarchs of Ethiopia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"8-Ball" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 8-Ball has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 1 § 8 Ball Pool until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 14:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]