User talk:JPelham

Welcome

Hello, JPelham, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! JPelham, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JPelham. You have new messages at Gourami Watcher's talk page.
Message added 14:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 14:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:32, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Pact

Hi, The disambiguation page Pact (disambiguation) is not a list of all uses of the abbreviation, but a list of Wikipedia articles someone might be looking for when they search on "PACT". So I've reverted your addition: Pilot Authority Control Tasks doesn't appear in any WP article (yet?), so it has no place on the dab page. Thanks. PamD 14:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MARG sensor arrays in AHRS

Hi JPelham,

you have recently (and competently, I take it) edited AHRS. Might I trouble you to take a look at this edit (see edit comment) and see if something can be done to expand it (and so make some room for it, see MARG)?

Sorry about this, I can't do it right now so I had to leave it in a state of pending next steps.

--217.81.153.12 (talk) 20:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asset health management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asset health management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 17:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JPelham. You have new messages at Talk:Asset health management.
Message added 18:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

331dot (talk) 18:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: No Fault Found (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To show that this is a widely used term you will need multiple sources that confirm that. You also need to provide verifiable references for all statements of fact in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:No Fault Found and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: No fault found has been accepted

No fault found, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Asset Health Management has been nominated for discussion

Category:Asset Health Management, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 12:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asset health management

Could you please provide background and context in the start of this article. What assets are we talking about, what kind of health are we talking about, where is this terminology coming from. See comments in this discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BAE Systems Magma

Your page is too short.Xx236 (talk) 11:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 It will be extended in due course JPelham (talk) 12:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hiller Air Tug for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiller Air Tug is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiller Air Tug until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was a bad decision regarding a novel helicopter concept. JPelham (talk) 08:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]