User talk:Jamsta

Canolfan Tryweryn

I noticed that you have been involved in creating the Afon Tryweryn article, and would like to inform you that I intend to merge the article with my newly created Canolfan Tryweryn article, unless you have any objections. DevAnubis 12:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please post replies in the Talk:Afon Tryweryn page, to save me having to search through all the user's talk pages to find any suggestions. DevAnubis 12:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Having been brought up in Heacham and done alot of the inital work on the article, your picture brought back alot of memories, and certainly improved the article. All the best ^Khukri 22:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

River Lee

Hi Jamster.Thankyou for your kind comments.I can assure the feeling is mutual,and I've appreciated all your contributions.As you know I am putting together the River Lee Flood Relief Channel article,a job made easier by the excellent Microsoft Earth.Northmetpit 07:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

River Lee

Hi Jamsta.Thankyou for your contributions.Sorry if I sound picky.But your new template weirs and locks on the Lee seem confusing.Would it be better if they were separated.I might have to re write some of our articles.Please let me know If you aren't happy with that,but as you know the Lee Valley is a complicated area.Your photographs are very good can you add some more please? Cheers Northmetpit 11:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Locks and Weirs on the Thames

Hi James .Yes ,that's very impressive.Hope we can achieve something as good as that for the Lee.You might have seen that I have added couple more minor Lee tributaries, but I think there are others.Ian Northmetpit 11:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nene Whitewater Centre

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nene Whitewater Centre, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikipaddle.org/wiki/Nene_Whitewater_Centre. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 23:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talking to bots is a silly idea, but if anyone else sees this - it's not a problem, I wrote some of the text. Jamsta 23:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somerset rivers

Hi, I see you've started an article on the West Lyn River & I've just added the WikiProject Somerset banner & assessment (you are v welcome to join the project). I was wondering seeing as you seem to be expert in rivers whether you could do the rivers River Isle & River Washford both of which are in Somerset but I can't find enough info to start articles?— Rod ^talk 13:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 30 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Simonsbath, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 21:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

River Thames

Thanks Jamsta - very much appreciated especially from you. In fact I was going to make the same comment in light of your Kayaking in the Thames. Incidentally I was at Shepperton and noticed the poles, but I dont think you would have gone out in the Red Board conditions photographed as at Lock Island. Motmit (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamsta - You might not be aware that there is a user Hellno2 who is currently having a go at canoeing, particularly organisations - with templates, deletion nominations etc. I am not sure how involved you are in some of the activities but you may have a view. Regards Motmit (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

River Lee Navigation Locks and Weirs template

Hi Jamsta. Hope you are OK. Most of the Navigation locks have been covered now. But I've found Bow Locks a mystery it is clearly signed as No 20 as this photo proves Bow Locks, but isn't included in the template. Shall I include it? Your thoughts please. Thanks Northmetpit (talk) 06:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

list of Artificial Whitewater Slalom Courses

Hello Jamsta. I see you are interested in this topic. You took down the imported text of the Adventure Sports Center International article. I am putting together a list of all such courses which is temporarily posted at User:HowardMorland/Sandbox. My goal is to include all the courses on the regular international competition circuit. Unaltered riverbed courses don't seem to be used in international competition, but if there are any I would have to decide whether to include them (and rename the list). Eventually each course in the list should get its own article.

Could you suggest any additions to the list, and places to get missing information about slope and streamflow? Thanks. HowardMorland (talk) 18:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message. I have responded on my talk page. HowardMorland (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Canolfan Tryweryn question, I got the following reply to my email inquiry: Hello, Thanks for your enquiry, the Afon Tryweryn is a natural river so doesn't fit into your list. Good luck with all this project. Regards, Bledd Lloyd, Canolfan Tryweryn, Frongoch, Bala, LL23 7NU, 01678 522034, bledd@ukrafting.co.uk, www.ukrafting.co.uk HowardMorland (talk) 17:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lee Navigation Route Map

Thanks for the edit. Looks like I was hunting for the name of the first weir and plucked it from the "Locks and Weirs on the River Lee, England" template - assuming (wrongly) that the first one is the top one. I now see it's the next one. I assume Horns Mill Weir must be further back up the unnavigable section. C'est la vie - lucky there's lots of editors watching over us. Ronhjones (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your question at User_talk:Ronhjones#Lee_Template_Map Ronhjones (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Whitewater_canoeing#Merger_proposal HowardMorland (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Done, use it wisely. John Reaves 11:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:FeildesWeir3.jpg

File:FeildesWeir3.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:FeildesWeir3.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:FeildesWeir3.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WareWeir.jpg is now available as Commons:File:WareWeir.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crantookbaybeach.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Crantook bay beach.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crantookbaydunes.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Crantook bay dunes.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:FistralNorth.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Fistal Beach north.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewater Course Geobox Templates etc

Thanks for your offer of help regarding the whitewater course pages. I only intended doing it for the Teesside White Water course as I am interested in all things Teesside. However if you want to adopt and adapt the templates for other courses then do not let me stop you. I cannot claim originality as these are adaptations of existing templates.

White Water Course Infoboxes

The White Water Course Infobox template is available on: Template:Infobox_whitewater_course/doc or you could simply copy the one on Teesside White Water Course and adapt. I made a few changes recently but I will leave it alone now.

White Water Course route map template

These can be copied from: Template:Teesside_White_Water_Course_map adapted and saved under a new template name for each course. Suitable icons can be selected from this repository: Template:Waterways_legend.

If the icon you want is not available in the repository then you can create it by modifying an existing icon with Inkscape (freeware). It is best to deposit any new icons in the above repository then others can use it and they can avoid duplicating the work. It is an excellent idea (read essential idea) to decide on the name of your new .svg file first, and exactly where you are going to put it in the repository, as otherwise you will almost certainly have to rename it to get it there. This wasn't easy but if you hit any roadblocks then get back in touch.
Stuffed cat (talk) 17:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello! I've seen you around on spaceflight-related articles and I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Spaceflight. We work on expanding and improving coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would be interested in joining please feel free to sign up and get involved. Thank you. N2e (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jamsta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jamsta. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jamsta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Locks and weirs on the River Lea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Locks and weirs on the River Lea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locks and weirs on the River Lea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]