Jump to content

User talk:JeremyA/Archive15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This archive page covers approximately the dates between 14 November 2010 and 16 May 2011.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.)

Thank you. Jeremy (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]



I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2010

[edit]
Delivered December 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 00:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Grant

[edit]

Hi, there! I'm curious why you removed Gwen Grant from the "Notable People from Worksop" list? She's a popular (and prolific) writer, from Worksop, where she continues to live and work. I've added a page for her.

In the interests of full disclosure, I should add that she's my Mom!

Iangrant1964 (talk) 01:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've deleted some pages of mine.

[edit]

Hi, my name is Alex and I have a pop band called Barker. Apparently the Barker page is a disambiguation page, so I created a similar page as Barker_(disambiguation) and then created in Barker a page for my band. You change it back to the way it was. Then I had the idea to create it as Barker_(band) but you deleted it. And as soon as I created a page for myself Alex_Motta, you deleted it too. I want the wikipedia pages to offer people a way to know more about us, but you keep deleting the pages I create! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youremyonlyhope (talkcontribs) 23:15, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Felice News

[edit]

You just deleted Felice News. The article was almost completely different & material that was not verifiable was accordingly deleted. The AfD that you cited in the deletion is further evidence that the article was deleted merely because of incorrect information, not notability. I strongly suggest you re-think your recent deletion.

Happy Holidays, --VivereInNY (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article may have some of the same text, although I deleted all of the text without valid references & added numerous external links for further verification of information. Please review the issues with the first article in detail & compare them to the slightly changed text of the second article. Key words like 'claim' have been added. All text without verifiable references has been deleted. I do not see what the problem is. Please tell me what, specifically, is wrong with the second article. It seems like a perfectly verifiable article to me. If the second article is not satisfactory, I invite you ti create your own article on the subject. I represent the actual website & can verify any & all of the information listed in the article. --VivereInNY (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External Coverage? See the following...

We've got lots of 'external coverage'. Why don't you just google Felice News. Also- If websites with less visitors than Felice, such as HappyNews.com, have wikipedias, dosent Felice deserve one, as well? Do you have any suggestions for creating a new article? Do you think that we have enough 'Notoriety' now? --VivereInNY (talk) 13:05, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2011

[edit]
Delivered January 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 08:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

St Andrews

[edit]

I'm wondering if you can help me?

I suspect that Blairtummock is being a bit of nuisance. Blairtummock recently has re-instated information about demolished town ports back into the landmarks section. At the end of the first paragraph, is the one and only reference and i seriously don't believe, unless i'm mistaken, mention anything relating to the content. I also believe that this information does not belongs in the section (it would be better in the history section), but if i am seen deleting this info again, Blairtummock will just put it back in. Kilnburn (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Pincus

[edit]

As an editor on the Mark Pincus page, would you mind weighing in on an issue I have raised on the page's discussion? I believe a recent edit was made without citing a reliable source. Since you have made edits on the page prior, I respect your opinion and would appreciate your insight. Thanks. NinaSpezz (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Hauser

[edit]

I edited the entry about me on Wikipedia because the previous entry was incomplete and inaccurate. All of the information that I included in the edit is accurate and verifiable. I have no problem with future additions from other readers, but request that my edit be restored. In the absence of that, please remove the entry about me from Wikipedia Thank you. Thomas Hauser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomashauser (talkcontribs) 22:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2011

[edit]
Delivered February 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 11:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for your help! Is this the only way to send a "thank you" note to an administrator? Marshallginsburg (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf Point, Chicago

[edit]

Thanks for your assistance in getting this one over the hump.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Baptiste Point du Sable

[edit]

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to note my appreciation for your effort to raise the quality of the Jean Baptiste Point du Sable article.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Hi JeremyA

Can I please ask you why you have removed the links I added as 'unnessary external links'?

The links were to relavant, unique content so I thought it was okay. I did one ages ago and it appeared to be acceptable (last August) but you have now deemed it unacceptable too and the few I did last night.

How unique does the content need to be before you will allow a link?

much appreciated Iain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.89.140.130 (talk) 12:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Jeremy

Sorry I was not signed in. My comments are the above.

As mentioned not sure why you removed my external link on Aviemore and other Scottish places.

It's unique content and it's useful content.

The links you have left are -

1) Good content http://www.cairngorms-park.com/Villages/Aviemore/

2) Good content http://visitcairngorms.com/

3) Good content - but same source as above, broken links over page http://visitcairngorms.com/whatson/

4) Good content http://www.aviemore.co.uk/services.htm

5) Very bad content, infact no content - just a page of Google links http://www.aviemoregolf.com/

6) Very bad content - really bad site http://www.whatsoninaviemore.com/

7) Bad content - intriguing site but poor content http://www.auldaviemore.co.uk/welcome.htm

So, in this context I am not sure how my link was deemed unneccessary. It's equally as good and useful as the best links. Is it that I added several links, without contributing content which irked you?

Apologies for taking up your time, I just want to understand so I can contribute better.

thanks Iain — Preceding unsigned comment added by IainMcNeill (talkcontribs) 13:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeremy, it's been some years since I last contacted you but I've followed a person onto WP and thought it appropriate to warn you. GeorgeGriffiths has and still does participate to Wikimapia. His behaviour has been for the least disruptive, disrespectful, uncoordinated, unreferenced, unverified and otherwise poor. He has been banned and is now on WM hit list of contributors to immediately ban as his behaviour has led the admins to no longer welcome him. GeorgeGriffiths has done his best, for such a young person, to circumvent the tens of bans by creating sockpuppets or contributing anonymously. Should you request it, I can send you links to all the threads on WM fora with discussions about his behaviour. All the best Jez. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 20:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the first three pages of "user behaviour" are three threads about George alone, I could dig out more if you require:
http://wikimapia.org/forum/?t=5525 http://wikimapia.org/forum/?t=6863 and http://wikimapia.org/forum/?t=6867 I'll look at getting the list of his sock-puppets' pseudonyms. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 21:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
and http://wikimapia.org/forum/?t=5291 Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 21:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Please note he's been contributing to WM anonymously with the following IP: 91.105.143.215 Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 21:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
'afternoon Jeremy, do you have grounds to think User:Tpxpress is a sockpuppet of User:GeorgeGriffiths? Looking at their contributions they are very similar. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 16:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Jeremy, as expected I'm facing two young persons regarding trivial topics. I think third party arbitration might be appropriate? Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 18:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, what have I stumbled upon here. I do not appreciate you talking about me behind my back. I would like to let you know that I am, in fact, a different person from Tpxpress. Tpxpress is my good friend who lives only a few roads away from me, which is why our edits are similar (we both actively edit about our local area, and we both love trains, too). I refuse to comment about Wikimapia. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He is actually quite right, as you'll see if you view User Talk:Captain Scarlet, then right at the bottom. It has come up before on Wikimapia that we are the same person, but how? It seems unethical! Tpxpress (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CONT. FROM LAST POST Yeah, it's unethical. How? WELL HOW COME BOTH ARE ON AT THE SAME TIME, EDITING AT THE SAME TIME UNDER DIFFERENT I.Ps? Uh? Well? I'll leve you to have a think Tpxpress (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have now been accused of being a sockpuppet of GeorgeGriffiths by Captain scarlet. We have never used the same IP, our contributions are barely similar and we haven't edited the same pages. I don't understand what connection I have with GeorgeGriffiths, I don't know him and I never contacted him until I was accused. I don't even know why I was accused. George888 (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jeremy, this has appear on my radar. Pretty sure it's George: User talk:86.146.234.84 Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 23:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stop flamin' wastin' your time you people! George888 isn't me. Tpxpress isn't me. And I use many IPs BECAUSE I HAVE MANY COMPUTERS: 1) my laptop 2) dads laptop 3) mums laptop 4) nans computer GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, there are lots of George's in the world, so stop accusing every single one of them. And anyway, what is it that you've got against me? What have I ever done to you? Hmmm? HMMM? GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Each of your home computers have the same public IP. Your IP today is 86.176.136.159 for instance. I made no reference to your sock-puppet accounts in my comment of the 23 April, I mentioned you logging out to make controversial and arguable contributions, a practice you used on Wikimapia and that I've warned you about on multiple occasions, today being the last time I have. When replying to comments, please have the decency to do so politely. Jeremy and I are a little older than you and we've learnt that shouting isn't the best approach, that includes Wikipedia. Regards, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy, before I saw George's comment above, I was going to mention Contributions/86.176.136.159, George's IP for the day with which he's been editing his usual articles. I read what you said about SPI and I understand. Since all actions are logged, little should evade our gaze if we are attentive. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote rigging

[edit]

Hi Jeremy, no doubt it hasn't fooled you but you'll notive there is an unsigned vote on Robin Brook AfD. The IP, 91.107.205.247 I have already on my radar, it is GeorgeGriffiths' IP I have on file at Wikimapia. His whois shows: that he is the person that was banned, I can get you a list of IPs George and his sockpuppet accounts have used at any time (and you may cross-reference them with your WP tools). Regards, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 19:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Muffins/Cttv

[edit]

User:Muffins/Cttv, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Muffins/Cttv and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Muffins/Cttv during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potineni You should find information here: potineni.webs.com http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/+/Potineni you should find information here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potineni123 (talkcontribs) 00:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2011

[edit]
Delivered March 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 22:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For God's sake, why did you delete it? I clearly stated that it was a Work In Progress and it was under construction. Now you deleted it FOR NO GOOD REASON, and I lost all my progress. Thanks a lot.

I seriously think you have something against me. Every page I create, you delete. And they're all good pages. What have I ever done to you? So, stop it. Seriously. It's childish. This Stops NOW. Got that? GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The Vandals are at the gates...Protect the women and children" But wait! No harm was done. Editor:JeremyA was at his post. Well Done! Buster Seven Talk 16:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeremy, I've started a discussion on the aforementioned article. Would you mind sharing your thoughts on my questions? Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:10, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your comments, there is good content in the article but needs rewording. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 19:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He's been quiet but I won't do anything until at least the weekend. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 07:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Taking your points into consideration, I hesitate between Brutalist architecture in Sheffield and, in line with Sheffield district rail rationalisation plan of the 1960s but in an architectural context Rebuilding of Sheffield in the 1950s or something like that; all construction post WWII from the 1950s to 1970s as included in the "Sheffield Replanned" published in 1945 and "Sheffield, Emerging City" publish in 1969 which shows the developments of this reconstruction. What do you think? Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 07:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed I was thinking along the lines of Rebuilding of Sheffield in the 1950s and yes, I'd have included the current contents of the brutalist article and put into a social housing section within the twenty-year long rebuilding scheme of the Corporation which includes transport, the city centre, woodlands, energy.. I'll look at a stub over the weekend. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 18:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Dusable

[edit]

Hi, I left a comment on the Dusable talk page and am wondering if you have anymore sourced info about Dusable's wife? Basically, my concern is that she is being left out of history, similar to the way he was for so long. If he's 'founder,' isn't she also? Thanks. Alanscottwalker (talk) 14:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rahm Emanuel page

[edit]

Hi, Jeremy.

I'm fairly new to editing on Wiki. Apparently I violated a guideline. I wasn't aware of the rules, so here's where I say "I'm sorry."

Thanks for pointing it out to me. What can I do?

Nutshell: Rahm Emanuel's page says his father was a member of the Irgun, listed as "a Jewish paramilitary organization." But Wiki's own listing for Irgun says "Irgun was legally classified as a terrorist organization by the State of Israel in 1948." And it has a link to a book on Google, listing in English the relevant text of the declaration.

I think that labelling a group as "paramilitary" when ISRAEL calls it "terrorist" is a form of political advocacy. Surely that's not what Wiki stands for.

What can I do to work on this? As I said, I'm fairly new to wiki editing. Thanks for your time.

TOM STEDHAM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomstedham (talkcontribs) 16:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2011

[edit]
Delivered April 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 23:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FeralFaces

[edit]

See User:FeralFace1's edits. I've already reported them as a vandalism-only account. Drmies (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A surprise

[edit]

Hey Jeremy, your Feral friend had posted something on the wrong Jeremy's page--User talk:Jeremy. To my surprise, after some plowing around I found that User:Ruhrfisch made the same mistake more than three years ago. So here, with a bit of a delay, is your well-earned DYK from February 2008. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 24 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kinzie Street railroad bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations and keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 22:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield Station tram stop

[edit]

I am ambivilent either way as to whether this page is deleted. But there needs to be some decision as to whether the railway station is an actual direct interchange, and thus should include reference to the tram stop there (as is the case with Manchester Piccadilly and Birmingham Snow Hill), or whether, given it has a seperate name, it should also be seperate (as with Station Street in Nottingham). Hammersfan 05/05/11, 10.40 BST

FARC

[edit]

I have nominated Sheffield Wednesday F.C. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Arsenikk (talk) 09:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2011

[edit]
Delivered May 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 04:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

/* Oakton-Skokie station */

[edit]
Hello, JeremyA. You have new messages at Lost on belmont's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.